| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
| |
We do up to `Term` which is the main bulk of the changes.
|
| |
|
|
| |
This is a first step towards some of the solutions proposed in #6008.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
To this extent we factor out the relevant bits to a new file,
ltac_pretype.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
The old algorithm was relying on list membership, which is O(n). This was
nefarious for terms with many binders. We use instead sets in O(log n).
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reminder of (some of) the reasons for removal:
- Despite the claim in sigma.mli, it does *not* prevent evar
leaks, something like:
fun env evd ->
let (evd',ev) = new_evar env evd in
(evd,ev)
will typecheck even with Sigma-like type annotations (with a proof of
reflexivity)
- The API stayed embryonic. Even typing functions were not ported to
Sigma.
- Some unsafe combinators (Unsafe.tclEVARS) were replaced with slightly
less unsafe ones (e.g. s_enter), but those ones were not marked unsafe
at all (despite still being so).
- There was no good story for higher order functions manipulating evar
maps. Without higher order, one can most of the time get away with
reusing the same name for the updated evar map.
- Most of the code doing complex things with evar maps was using unsafe
casts to sigma. This code should be fixed, but this is an orthogonal
issue.
Of course, this was showing a nice and elegant use of GADTs, but the
cost/benefit ratio in practice did not seem good.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
evars.
This is for consistency with the rest of the language. For instance,
"eremember" and "epose" are supposed to refer to terms occurring in
the goal, hence not leaving evars, hence in general pointless.
Eventually, I guess that "e" should be a modifier (see e.g. the
discussion at #3872), or the difference is removed.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Also move named arguments to the beginning of the functions. As per
https://github.com/coq/coq/pull/201#discussion_r110928302
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This will allow a cache_term tactic that doesn't suffer from the
Not_found anomalies of abstract in typeclass resolution.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a small change that allows a transparent version of tclABSTRACT.
Additionally, it factors the machinery of [abstract] through a
plugin-accessible function which allows alternate continuations (other
than exact_no_check.
It might be nice to factor it further, into a cache_term function that
caches a term, and a separate bit that calls cache_term with the result
of running the tactic.
|
| |\ |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
All functions where actually called with the second argument of the pending
problem being the current evar map. We simply remove this useless and
error-prone second component.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Now they are useless because all of the primitives are (should?) be
evar-insensitive.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This removes quite a few unsafe casts. Unluckily, I had to reintroduce
the old non-module based names for these data structures, because I could
not reproduce easily the same hierarchy in EConstr.
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| |/ |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Comments
--------
- The tactic specialize conveys a somehow intuitive reasoning concept
and I would support continuing maintaining it even if the design
comes in my opinion with some oddities. (Note that the experience of
MathComp and SSReflect also suggests that specialize is an
interesting concept in itself).
There are two variants to specialize:
- specialize (H args) with H an hypothesis looks natural: we
specialize H with extra arguments and the "as pattern" clause comes
naturally as an extension of it, destructuring the result using the
pattern.
- specialize term with bindings makes the choice of fully applying the
term filling missing expressions with bindings and to then behave as
generalize. Wouldn't we like a more fine-grained approach and the
result to remain in the context?
In this second case, the "as" clause works as if the term were posed
in the context with "pose proof".
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
simplifying and generalizing the grammar entries for injection,
discriminate and simplify_eq.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In pat%constr, creating new evars is now allowed only if "eintros" is
given, i.e. "intros" checks that no evars are created, and similarly
e.g. for "injection ... as ... pat%constr".
The form "eintros [...]" or "eintros ->" with the case analysis or
rewrite creating evars is now also supported.
This is not a commitment to say that it is good to have an e- modifier
to tactics. It is just to be consistent with the existing convention.
It seems to me that the "no e-" variants are good for beginners. However,
expert might prefer to use the e-variants by default. Opinions from
teachers and users would be useful.
To be possibly done: do that [= ...] work on hypotheses with side
conditions or parameters based on the idea that they apply the full
injection and not only the restriction of it to goals which are
exactly an equality, as it is today.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
simpler re-printing of assert.
Also fixing the precedence for printing "by" clause.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
It is indeed confusing, as it has little to do with the proper refine defined
in the New submodule. Legacy code relying on it should call the Logic or
Tacmach modules instead.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
This reverts commit bde36d4b00185065628324d8ca71994f84eae244.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
allows for a simpler re-printing of assert.
Also fixing the precedence for printing "by" clause.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |\ |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| |\ \ |
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
The structure of the Context module was refined in such a way that:
- Types and functions related to rel-context declarations were put into the Context.Rel.Declaration module.
- Types and functions related to rel-context were put into the Context.Rel module.
- Types and functions related to named-context declarations were put into the Context.Named.Declaration module.
- Types and functions related to named-context were put into the Context.Named module.
- Types and functions related to named-list-context declarations were put into Context.NamedList.Declaration module.
- Types and functions related to named-list-context were put into Context.NamedList module.
Some missing comments were added to the *.mli file.
The output of ocamldoc was checked whether it looks in a reasonable way.
"TODO: cleanup" was removed
The order in which are exported functions listed in the *.mli file was changed.
(as in a mature modules, this order usually is not random)
The order of exported functions in Context.{Rel,Named} modules is now consistent.
(as there is no special reason why that order should be different)
The order in which are functions defined in the *.ml file is the same as the order in which they are listed in the *.mli file.
(as there is no special reason to define them in a different order)
The name of the original fold_{rel,named}_context{,_reverse} functions was changed to better indicate what those functions do.
(Now they are called Context.{Rel,Named}.fold_{inside,outside})
The original comments originally attached to the fold_{rel,named}_context{,_reverse} did not full make sense so they were updated.
Thrown exceptions are now documented.
Naming of formal parameters was made more consistent across different functions.
Comments of similar functions in different modules are now consistent.
Comments from *.mli files were copied to *.ml file.
(We need that information in *.mli files because that is were ocamldoc needs it.
It is nice to have it also in *.ml files because when we are using Merlin and jump to the definion of the function,
we can see the comments also there and do not need to open a different file if we want to see it.)
When we invoke ocamldoc, we instruct it to generate UTF-8 HTML instead of (default) ISO-8859-1.
(UTF-8 characters are used in our ocamldoc markup)
"open Context" was removed from all *.mli and *.ml files.
(Originally, it was OK to do that. Now it is not.)
An entry to dev/doc/changes.txt file was added that describes how the names of types and functions have changed.
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Note that code depending on apply_type might now have to ensure that
typing constraints that were possibly generated by apply_type are now
taken into account in advance.
|
Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias
Pierre-Marie Pédrot
Maxime Dénès
Hugo Herbelin
Jason Gross
Matej Kosik