| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Design choice: Failing with an anomaly or with a catchable Ltac error
"Fail": we fail with a Fail as it was the case with the related
constrained version of tclTHENFIRST/tclTHENLAST.
|
| |\ |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
Noticed by Sigurd Schneider.
|
| |/ |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In current code, `Proofview.Goal.t` uses a phantom type to indicate
whether the goal was properly substituted wrt current `evar_map` or
not.
After the introduction of `EConstr`, this distinction should have
become unnecessary, thus we remove the phantom parameter from
`'a Proofview.Goal.t`. This may introduce some minor incompatibilities
at the typing level. Code-wise, things should remain the same.
We thus deprecate `assume`. In a next commit, we will remove
normalization as much as possible from the code.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
... in favor of having Public/Internal sub modules in each and
every module grouping functions according to their intended client.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
We do up to `Term` which is the main bulk of the changes.
|
| |
|
|
| |
This is a first step towards some of the solutions proposed in #6008.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reminder of (some of) the reasons for removal:
- Despite the claim in sigma.mli, it does *not* prevent evar
leaks, something like:
fun env evd ->
let (evd',ev) = new_evar env evd in
(evd,ev)
will typecheck even with Sigma-like type annotations (with a proof of
reflexivity)
- The API stayed embryonic. Even typing functions were not ported to
Sigma.
- Some unsafe combinators (Unsafe.tclEVARS) were replaced with slightly
less unsafe ones (e.g. s_enter), but those ones were not marked unsafe
at all (despite still being so).
- There was no good story for higher order functions manipulating evar
maps. Without higher order, one can most of the time get away with
reusing the same name for the updated evar map.
- Most of the code doing complex things with evar maps was using unsafe
casts to sigma. This code should be fixed, but this is an orthogonal
issue.
Of course, this was showing a nice and elegant use of GADTs, but the
cost/benefit ratio in practice did not seem good.
|
| |\ |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
Now it is a private field, locations are optional.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The current implementation was still using continuation passing-style, and
furthermore was triggering a focus on the goals. We take advantage of the
tactic features instead.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The only remaining use was applied on the unfold tactic, and the behaviours
of tclPROGRESS and tclWEAK_PROGRESS coincide whenever only one goal is produced
by their argument tactic.
|
| |/
|
|
| |
The only use in Equality is reimplemented in the new engine.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
The transition has been done a bit brutally. I think we can still save a
lot of useless normalizations here and there by providing the right API
in EConstr. Nonetheless, this is a first step.
|
| |\ |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Now they are useless because all of the primitives are (should?) be
evar-insensitive.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This is now useless as this returns evar-constrs, so that all functions acting
on them should be insensitive to evar-normalization.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This removes quite a few unsafe casts. Unluckily, I had to reintroduce
the old non-module based names for these data structures, because I could
not reproduce easily the same hierarchy in EConstr.
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
We make mli files look to what they were looking before the move to EConstr
by opening this module.
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| |/ |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This allows to write things like this:
split; 2: intro _; exact I
or like this:
eexists ?[x]; ?[x]: exact 0; trivial
This has the side-effect on making the '?' before '[x]' mandatory.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
- Fixing dead code, doc.
- Relaxing constraints on using an as-tuple in inversion.
|
| |\ |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The length of the pattern should now be exactly the number of
assumptions and definitions introduced by the destruction or induction,
including the induction hypotheses in case of an induction.
Like for pattern-matching, the local definitions in the argument of
the constructor can be skipped in which case a name is automatically
created for these.
|
| | | |
|
| |\ \ |
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
The structure of the Context module was refined in such a way that:
- Types and functions related to rel-context declarations were put into the Context.Rel.Declaration module.
- Types and functions related to rel-context were put into the Context.Rel module.
- Types and functions related to named-context declarations were put into the Context.Named.Declaration module.
- Types and functions related to named-context were put into the Context.Named module.
- Types and functions related to named-list-context declarations were put into Context.NamedList.Declaration module.
- Types and functions related to named-list-context were put into Context.NamedList module.
Some missing comments were added to the *.mli file.
The output of ocamldoc was checked whether it looks in a reasonable way.
"TODO: cleanup" was removed
The order in which are exported functions listed in the *.mli file was changed.
(as in a mature modules, this order usually is not random)
The order of exported functions in Context.{Rel,Named} modules is now consistent.
(as there is no special reason why that order should be different)
The order in which are functions defined in the *.ml file is the same as the order in which they are listed in the *.mli file.
(as there is no special reason to define them in a different order)
The name of the original fold_{rel,named}_context{,_reverse} functions was changed to better indicate what those functions do.
(Now they are called Context.{Rel,Named}.fold_{inside,outside})
The original comments originally attached to the fold_{rel,named}_context{,_reverse} did not full make sense so they were updated.
Thrown exceptions are now documented.
Naming of formal parameters was made more consistent across different functions.
Comments of similar functions in different modules are now consistent.
Comments from *.mli files were copied to *.ml file.
(We need that information in *.mli files because that is were ocamldoc needs it.
It is nice to have it also in *.ml files because when we are using Merlin and jump to the definion of the function,
we can see the comments also there and do not need to open a different file if we want to see it.)
When we invoke ocamldoc, we instruct it to generate UTF-8 HTML instead of (default) ISO-8859-1.
(UTF-8 characters are used in our ocamldoc markup)
"open Context" was removed from all *.mli and *.ml files.
(Originally, it was OK to do that. Now it is not.)
An entry to dev/doc/changes.txt file was added that describes how the names of types and functions have changed.
|
| |/ /
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The previous implementation was a source of evar leaks if misused, as
it created values coming together with their current evar_map. This is
dead wrong if the value is not used on the spot. To fix this, we rather
return a ['a delayed_open] object.
Two argument types were modified: bindings and constr_bindings. The
open_constr argument should also be fixed, but it is more entangled and
thus I leave it for another commit.
|
| |/
|
|
|
|
| |
This is not perfect though, some primitives are unsound, and some
higher-order API should use polymorphic functions so as not to depend
on a given level.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Instead of modifying exceptions to wear additional information, we instead use
a dedicated type now. All exception-using functions were modified to support
this new type, in particular Future's fix_exn-s and the tactic monad.
To solve the problem of enriching exceptions at raise time and recover this
data in the try-with handler, we use a global datastructure recording the
given piece of data imperatively that we retrieve in the try-with handler.
We ensure that such instrumented try-with destroy the data so that there
may not be confusion with another exception. To further harden the correction
of this structure, we also check for pointer equality with the last raised
exception.
The global data structure is not thread-safe for now, which is incorrect as
the STM uses threads and enriched exceptions. Yet, we splitted the patch in
two parts, so that we do not introduce dependencies to the Thread library
immediatly. This will allow to revert only the second patch if ever we
switch to OCaml-coded lightweight threads.
|
| |
|
|
| |
[tryif t then t2 else t3] behaves like [t;t2] if [t] has at least one success, or [t3] otherwise. It generalises [t||t3] as failures from [t2] will not be caught.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
[Proofview].
The primitives in [Tacticals] respect Ltac's error level, whereas the one in [Proofview] do not necessarily. In that case the error caught was ignored causing arbitrary error level after [constructor] to be canceled.
Needed the addition of an [ORD] variant to [OR] in [Tacticals.New] to avoid unnecessary precomputation (the 'D' stands for 'delay').
Fixes #3838.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
can be given with second H bound by the first one.
Not very satisfied by passing closure to tactics.ml, but otherwise
tactics would have to be aware of glob_constr.
|
| |
|
|
| |
"pat/term" for "apply term on current_hyp as pat".
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- emphasizing the different kinds of patterns
- factorizing code of the non-naming intro-patterns
Still some questions:
- Should -> and <- apply to hypotheses or not (currently they apply to
hypotheses either when used in assert-style tactics or apply in, or
when the term to rewrite is a variable, in which case "subst" is
applied)?
- Should "subst" be used when the -> or <- rewrites an equation x=t
posed by "assert" (i.e. rewrite everywhere and clearing x and hyp)?
- Should -> and <- be applicable in non assert-style if the lemma has
quantifications?
|
| |
|
|
| |
backtracks, print time spent in each of successive calls.
|
Hugo Herbelin
Maxime Dénès
Théo Zimmermann
Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias
Enrico Tassi
Matej Košík
Pierre-Marie Pédrot
Cyprien Mangin
Pierre Letouzey
Matej Kosik
Arnaud Spiwack