| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`Vernacexpr` lives conceptually higher than `proof`, however,
datatypes for bullets and goal selectors are in `Vernacexpr`.
In particular, we move:
- `proof_bullet`: to `Proof_bullet`
- `goal_selector`: to a new file `Goal_select`
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We place `Proof_using` in the proper place [`vernac`] and we remove
gross parsing hacks.
The new placement should allow to use the printers and more convenient
structure, and reduce strange coupling between parsing and internal
representation.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We sort the dependency graph of API by following a logical declaration
order in `API.{ml,mli}` related to the actual dependency order of Coq
modules.
Things are a bit tricky here as Coq itself relies on the fact that
OCaml treats module interface and implementation separately
dependency-wise; however, when resorting module alias the design seems
to become more coupled.
Currently, API exposes both "namespaces", asserting a large number of
type equality between them, however the `API` namespace is not
self-contained.
In particular, this is a first step to solve problems such as
`Summary.frozen` being used in `API.mli` but not declared by the
`API.Summary` module, etc... In general we follow the invariant that a
type used in `API` must have been declared before.
Keep in mind that OCaml upstream has warned that it maybe tricky to
alias objects in this way. In particular, after API the old `mli` only
files have become full compilation units so we may want to be more
careful here.
The more "correct" declaration order allows us to remove the
`API.Prelude` module, as well as some other declarations that I
consider as spurious.
We still maintain the large number of type aliases which will be
removed in a future patch.
We follow linking order except for files in `intf`, which are
conceptually wrongly placed in the linking hierarchy but this doesn't
matter as the files don't contain any implementation.
We also move a couple of `.mli` only files to `.ml` so we are
consistent, and correct their linking order in `mllib`, even if that
doesn't matter as such `.ml`-only files contain no implementations.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bullets were placed inside the `Proof_global` module, I guess that due
to the global registration function. However, it has logically nothing
to do with the functionality of `Proof_global` and the current
placement may create some interference between the developers
reworking proof state handling and bullets.
We thus put the bullet functionality into its own, independent file.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
together with the tactic monad.
The move is not complete yet, because some file candidates for this directory
have almost useless dependencies in other ones that should not be moved.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
defined and the file providing the primitives.
The datatypes are defined in [Proofview_monad], previous [Proofview_monad] is now called [Logic_monad] since it is more generic since the refactoring.
|
| |
|
|
| |
another one.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
NB: new file miscprint.ml deserves to be part of printing.cma,
but should be part of proofs.cma for the moment, due to use in logic.ml
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Proof using can be followed by:
- All : all variables
- Type : all variables occurring in the type
- expr:
- (a b .. c) : set
- expr + expr : set union
- expr - expr : set difference
- -expr : set complement (All - expr)
Exceptions:
- a singleton set can be written without parentheses. This also allows
the implementation of named sets sharing the same name space of
section hyps ans write
- bla - x : where bla is defined as (a b .. x y) elsewhere.
- if expr is just a set, then parentheses can be omitted
This module also implements some AI to tell the user how he could
decorate "Proof" with a "using BLA" clause.
Finally, one can Set Default Proof Using "str" to any string that is
used whenever the "using ..." part is missing. The coding of this
sucks a little since it is the parser that applies the default.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
by extraction.
The goal was to use Coq's partial evaluation capabilities to do manually some
inlining that Ocaml couldn't do. It may be critical as we are defining higher
order combinators in term of others and no inlining means a lot of
unnecessary, short-lived closures built.
With this modification we get back some (but not all) of the loss of performance introduced by threading the monadic type all over the place.
I still have an estimated 15% longer compilation time for Coq.
Makes use of Set Extraction Conservative Types and Set Extraction File Comment
to maintain the relationship between the functions and their types.
Uses an intermediate layer Proofview_monad between Proofview_gen and
Proofview in order to use a hand-written mli to catch potential errors in the
generated file (it uses Extract Constant a lot).
A bug in the extraction of signatures forces to remove the generated
proofview_gen.mli which does not have the correct types.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@16981 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
interleaving of ltac and ml code is not visible (this particularly
applies to ltac notation ring, which calls ml-level ring_lookup and
Ring again at the ltac level, resulting in non-localisation of "ring"
errors).
Added also missing LtacLocated checks in Class_instance and Proofview.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@16204 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
All the purely monadic code has been moved to a new module Monads,
where, I'm afraid to confess, I got to use a number of proof transformers
to modularise the definition of tactics. It is still not easy to understand (why
would it with backtracking support?) but at least it's more robust, cleaner,
and more extensible. Plus there is now a Proofview.tclORELSE which will
be used to interprete the Ltac tactical (t1 || t2).
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@15596 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Stuff about reductions now in genredexpr.mli, operations in redops.ml
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@15374 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
NB: former Tacexpr.no_move is now Tacexpr.MoveLast
(when introducing, intro with no move is intro as last)
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@15373 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a fairly large commit (around 140 files and 7000 lines of code
impacted), it will cause some troubles for sure (I've listed the know
regressions below, there is bound to be more).
At this state of developpement it brings few features to the user, as
the old tactics were
ported with no change. Changes are on the side of the developer mostly.
Here comes a list of the major changes. I will stay brief, but the code
is hopefully well documented so that it is reasonably easy to infer the
details from it.
Feature developer-side:
* Primitives for a "real" refine tactic (generating a goal for each
evar).
* Abstract type of tactics, goals and proofs
* Tactics can act on several goals (formally all the focused goals). An
interesting consequence of this is that the tactical (. ; [ . | ... ])
can be separated in two
tacticals (. ; .) and ( [ . | ... ] ) (although there is a conflict for
this particular syntax). We can also imagine a tactic to reorder the
goals.
* Possibility for a tactic to pass a value to following tactics (a
typical example is
an intro function which tells the following tactics which name it
introduced).
* backtracking primitives for tactics (it is now possible to implement a
tactical '+'
with (a+b);c equivalent to (a;c+b;c) (itself equivalent to
(a;c||b;c)). This is a valuable
tool to implement tactics like "auto" without nowing of the
implementation of tactics.
* A notion of proof modes, which allows to dynamically change the parser
for tactics. It is controlled at user level with the keywords Set
Default Proof Mode (this is the proof mode which is loaded at the start
of each proof) and Proof Mode (switches the proof mode of the current
proof) to control them.
* A new primitive Evd.fold_undefined which operates like an Evd.fold,
except it only goes through the evars whose body is Evar_empty. This is
a common operation throughout the code,
some of the fold-and-test-if-empty occurences have been replaced by
fold_undefined. For now,
it is only implemented as a fold-and-test, but we expect to have some
optimisations coming some day, as there can be a lot of evars in an
evar_map with this new implementation (I've observed a couple of
thousands), whereas there are rarely more than a dozen undefined ones.
Folding being a linear operation, this might result in a significant
speed-up.
* The declarative mode has been moved into the plugins. This is made
possible by the proof mode feature. I tried to document it so that it
can serve as a tutorial for a tactic mode plugin.
Features user-side:
* Unfocus does not go back to the root of the proof if several Focus-s
have been performed.
It only goes back to the point where it was last focused.
* experimental (non-documented) support of keywords
BeginSubproof/EndSubproof:
BeginSubproof focuses on first goal, one can unfocus only with
EndSubproof, and only
if the proof is completed for that goal.
* experimental (non-documented) support for bullets ('+', '-' and '*')
they act as hierarchical BeginSubproof/EndSubproof:
First time one uses '+' (for instance) it focuses on first goal, when
the subproof is
completed, one can use '+' again which unfocuses and focuses on next
first goal.
Meanwhile, one cas use '*' (for instance) to focus more deeply.
Known regressions:
* The xml plugin had some functions related to proof trees. As the
structure of proof changed significantly, they do not work anymore.
* I do not know how to implement info or show script in this new engine.
Actually I don't even know what they were suppose to actually mean in
earlier versions either. I wager they would require some calm thinking
before going back to work.
* Declarative mode not entirely working (in particular proofs by
induction need to be restored).
* A bug in the inversion tactic (observed in some contributions)
* A bug in Program (observed in some contributions)
* Minor change in the 'old' type of tactics causing some contributions
to fail.
* Compilation time takes about 10-15% longer for unknown reasons (I
suspect it might be linked to the fact that I don't perform any
reduction at QED-s, and also to some linear operations on evar_map-s
(see Evd.fold_undefined above)).
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@12961 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
|
* generalize the use of .mllib to build all cma, not only in plugins/
* the .mllib in plugins/ now mention Bruno's new _mod.ml files
* lots of .cmo enumerations in Makefile.common are removed, since
they are now in .mllib
* the list of .cmo/.cmi can be retreive via a shell script line,
see for instance rule install-library
* Tolink.core_objs and Tolink.ide now contains ocaml _modules_, not
_files_
* a -I option to coqdep_boot allows to control piority of includes
(some files with the same names in kernel and checker ...)
This is quite a lot of changes, you know who to blame / report to
if something breaks.
... and last but not least I've started playing with ocamlbuild.
The myocamlbuild.ml is far from complete now, but it already allows
to build coqtop.{opt,byte} here. See comments at the top of
myocamlbuild.ml, and don't hesitate to contribute, either for completing
or simplifying it !
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@12002 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias
Pierre Letouzey
Pierre-Marie Pédrot
Arnaud Spiwack
Hugo Herbelin
Enrico Tassi
aspiwack
herbelin
letouzey