| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
| |
Dead code formerly used by the now defunct [autoinstances].
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Involves changing the [mind_finite] field in the kernel from a bool to the trivalued type [Decl_kinds.recursivity_kind]. This is why so many files are (unfortunately) affected. It would not be very surprising if some bug was introduced.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Just like the [Record] keyword allows only non-recursive records.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Parametric printers are now using a record to ease the error reporting when
modificating code. Further improvement may include the use of the object
layer of OCaml, which would fit in this particular context.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This revert somehow f5d7b2b1eda550f5bf0965286d449112acbbadde about "Hypotheses
don't respect Barendregt convention".
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
now done entirely using declare_mind, which declares the associated
constants for primitive records. This avoids a hack related to
elimination schemes and ensures that the forward references to constants
in the mutual inductive entry are properly declared just after the
inductive. This also clarifies (and simplifies) the code of term_typing
for constants which does not have to deal with building
or checking projections anymore.
Also fix printing of universes showing the de Bruijn encoding in a few places.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Instead of having a version of unpackers for each level, we use a dummy argument
to force unification of types.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's possible that I should have removed more "allows", as many
instances of "foo allows to bar" could have been replaced by "foo bars"
(e.g., "[Qed] allows to check and save a complete proof term" could be
"[Qed] checks and saves a complete proof term"), but not always (e.g.,
"the optional argument allows to ignore universe polymorphism" should
not be "the optional argument ignores universe polymorphism" but "the
optional argument allows the caller to instruct Coq to ignore universe
polymorphism" or something similar).
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
can be given with second H bound by the first one.
Not very satisfied by passing closure to tactics.ml, but otherwise
tactics would have to be aware of glob_constr.
|
| |
|
|
| |
"pat/term" for "apply term on current_hyp as pat".
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- emphasizing the different kinds of patterns
- factorizing code of the non-naming intro-patterns
Still some questions:
- Should -> and <- apply to hypotheses or not (currently they apply to
hypotheses either when used in assert-style tactics or apply in, or
when the term to rewrite is a variable, in which case "subst" is
applied)?
- Should "subst" be used when the -> or <- rewrites an equation x=t
posed by "assert" (i.e. rewrite everywhere and clearing x and hyp)?
- Should -> and <- be applicable in non assert-style if the lemma has
quantifications?
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
unsatisfiable constraint failures but give sensible error messages if
an occurrence was found and only typeclass resolution failed.
Fixes MathClasses.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Also taking advantage of the change to rename it into TacML. Ultimately
should allow ML tactic to return values.
|
| |
|
|
| |
change of printing format of forall (need more thinking).
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
all the tactics using the constructor keyword in one entry. This has the
side-effect to also remove the other variant of constructor from the AST.
I also needed to hack around the "tauto" tactic to make it work, by
calling directly the ML tactic through a TacExtend node. This may be
generalized to get rid of the intermingled dependencies between this
tactic and the infamous Ltac quotation mechanism.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
hypothesis when using it in apply or rewrite (prefix ">",
undocumented), and a modifier to explicitly keep it in induction or
destruct (prefix "!", reminiscent of non-linerarity).
Also added undocumented option "Set Default Clearing Used Hypotheses"
which makes apply and rewrite default to erasing the hypothesis they
use (if ever their argument is indeed an hypothesis of the context).
|
| |
|
|
| |
subgoals and the role of the "by tac" clause swapped.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
par: distributes the goals among a number of workers given
by -async-proofs-tac-j (defaults to 2).
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
variables.
Simplifies instantiation of constants/inductives, requiring less allocation and Map.find's.
Abstraction by variables is handled mostly inside the kernel but could be moved outside.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Differs from the usual t;[t1…tn] in two ways:
* It can be used without a preceding tactic
* It counts every focused subgoal, rather than considering independently the goals generated by the application of the preceding tactic on individual goals.
In other words t;[t1…tn] is [> t;[>t1…tn].. ].
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
It is meant to avoid intermediary retyping when a term is built in Ltac. See #3218.
The implementation makes a small modification in Constrintern: now the main internalisation function can take an extra substitution from Ltac variables to glob_constr and will apply the substitution during the internalisation.
|
| |
|
|
| |
potentially conflicting tactics names from different plugins.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
| |
They used to be the same (and had a single entry in the AST). But now that t2 can be a multi-goal tactic, t1;[t2..] has the semantics of executing t2 in each goal independently.
|
| |
|
|
| |
definitions.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
any prefix of the given qualid.
|
Pierre-Marie Pédrot
Arnaud Spiwack
Pierre Boutillier
Matthieu Sozeau
Jason Gross
Xavier Clerc
Hugo Herbelin
Matthieu Sozeau
Enrico Tassi