| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We add .mli files, removed dead code and use standard combinators
instead of redefined ad-hoc ones in a few places.
A lot of cleaning still has to be done on this code: documenting the
interfaces, resolving the many abstraction leaks. I suspect there is
still a lot of code duplication.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
with OCaml 3.12.1).
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@16787 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
the new Int module. Only the most obvious were removed, so there
are a lot more in the wild.
This may sound heavyweight, but it has two advantages:
1. Monomorphization is explicit, hence we do not miss particular
optimizations of equality when doing it carelessly with the generic
equality.
2. When we have removed all the generic equalities on integers, we
will be able to write something like "let (=) = ()" to retrieve all
its other uses (mostly faulty) spread throughout the code, statically.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@15957 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
especially about unused definitions, unused opens and unused rec
flags.
The following patch uses information gathered using these warnings to
clean Coq source tree. In this patch, I focused on warnings whose fix
are very unlikely to introduce bugs.
(a) "unused rec flags". They cannot change the semantics of the program
but only allow the inliner to do a better job.
(b) "unused type definitions". I only removed type definitions that were
given to functors that do not require them. Some type definitions were
used as documentation to obtain better error messages, but were not
ascribed to any definition. I superficially mentioned them in one
arbitrary chosen definition to remove the warning. This is unaesthetic
but I did not find a better way.
(c) "unused for loop index". The following idiom of imperative
programming is used at several places: "for i = 1 to n do
that_side_effect () done". I replaced "i" with "_i" to remove the
warning... but, there is a combinator named "Util.repeat" that
would only cost us a function call while improving readibility.
Should'nt we use it?
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@15797 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
|
|
| |
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@15715 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
|
|
| |
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@14155 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@14116 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|