| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
... | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
The original datatype:
Entries.local_entry = LocalDef of constr
| LocalAssum of constr
was changed to:
Entries.local_entry = LocalDefEntry of constr
| LocalAssumEntry of constr
There are two advantages:
1. the new names are consistent with other variant names in the same module
which also have this "*Entry" suffix
2. the new names do not collide with variants defined in the Context.{Rel,Named}.Declaration
modules so both, "Entries" as well as "Context.{Rel,Named}.Declaration" can be open at the same time.
The disadvantage is that those new variants are longer.
But since those variants are rarely used, it it is not a big deal.
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
|
| | | | |
|
|/ / /
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Originally, rel-context was represented as:
Context.rel_context = Names.Name.t * Constr.t option * Constr.t
Now it is represented as:
Context.Rel.t = LocalAssum of Names.Name.t * Constr.t
| LocalDef of Names.Name.t * Constr.t * Constr.t
Originally, named-context was represented as:
Context.named_context = Names.Id.t * Constr.t option * Constr.t
Now it is represented as:
Context.Named.t = LocalAssum of Names.Id.t * Constr.t
| LocalDef of Names.Id.t * Constr.t * Constr.t
Motivation:
(1) In "tactics/hipattern.ml4" file we define "test_strict_disjunction"
function which looked like this:
let test_strict_disjunction n lc =
Array.for_all_i (fun i c ->
match (prod_assum (snd (decompose_prod_n_assum n c))) with
| [_,None,c] -> isRel c && Int.equal (destRel c) (n - i)
| _ -> false) 0 lc
Suppose that you do not know about rel-context and named-context.
(that is the case of people who just started to read the source code)
Merlin would tell you that the type of the value you are destructing
by "match" is:
'a * 'b option * Constr.t (* worst-case scenario *)
or
Named.Name.t * Constr.t option * Constr.t (* best-case scenario (?) *)
To me, this is akin to wearing an opaque veil.
It is hard to figure out the meaning of the values you are looking at.
In particular, it is hard to discover the connection between the value
we are destructing above and the datatypes and functions defined
in the "kernel/context.ml" file.
In this case, the connection is there, but it is not visible
(between the function above and the "Context" module).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now consider, what happens when the reader see the same function
presented in the following form:
let test_strict_disjunction n lc =
Array.for_all_i (fun i c ->
match (prod_assum (snd (decompose_prod_n_assum n c))) with
| [LocalAssum (_,c)] -> isRel c && Int.equal (destRel c) (n - i)
| _ -> false) 0 lc
If the reader haven't seen "LocalAssum" before, (s)he can use Merlin
to jump to the corresponding definition and learn more.
In this case, the connection is there, and it is directly visible
(between the function above and the "Context" module).
(2) Also, if we already have the concepts such as:
- local declaration
- local assumption
- local definition
and we describe these notions meticulously in the Reference Manual,
then it is a real pity not to reinforce the connection
of the actual code with the abstract description we published.
|
|\| | |
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
For instance, in
Inductive I : nat -> nat -> Prop := C : forall z, let '(x,y) := z in x + y = 0.
the computation of the number of arguments to I was made wrong in bde12b70.
|
|\| | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
|\| | |
|
|\ \ \ |
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
The structure of the Context module was refined in such a way that:
- Types and functions related to rel-context declarations were put into the Context.Rel.Declaration module.
- Types and functions related to rel-context were put into the Context.Rel module.
- Types and functions related to named-context declarations were put into the Context.Named.Declaration module.
- Types and functions related to named-context were put into the Context.Named module.
- Types and functions related to named-list-context declarations were put into Context.NamedList.Declaration module.
- Types and functions related to named-list-context were put into Context.NamedList module.
Some missing comments were added to the *.mli file.
The output of ocamldoc was checked whether it looks in a reasonable way.
"TODO: cleanup" was removed
The order in which are exported functions listed in the *.mli file was changed.
(as in a mature modules, this order usually is not random)
The order of exported functions in Context.{Rel,Named} modules is now consistent.
(as there is no special reason why that order should be different)
The order in which are functions defined in the *.ml file is the same as the order in which they are listed in the *.mli file.
(as there is no special reason to define them in a different order)
The name of the original fold_{rel,named}_context{,_reverse} functions was changed to better indicate what those functions do.
(Now they are called Context.{Rel,Named}.fold_{inside,outside})
The original comments originally attached to the fold_{rel,named}_context{,_reverse} did not full make sense so they were updated.
Thrown exceptions are now documented.
Naming of formal parameters was made more consistent across different functions.
Comments of similar functions in different modules are now consistent.
Comments from *.mli files were copied to *.ml file.
(We need that information in *.mli files because that is were ocamldoc needs it.
It is nice to have it also in *.ml files because when we are using Merlin and jump to the definion of the function,
we can see the comments also there and do not need to open a different file if we want to see it.)
When we invoke ocamldoc, we instruct it to generate UTF-8 HTML instead of (default) ISO-8859-1.
(UTF-8 characters are used in our ocamldoc markup)
"open Context" was removed from all *.mli and *.ml files.
(Originally, it was OK to do that. Now it is not.)
An entry to dev/doc/changes.txt file was added that describes how the names of types and functions have changed.
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
On a machine with only 1GB of memory (e.g. in a VM), the compiler might be
abruptly killed by a segfault. We were not getting any feedback in that
case, making it harder to debug.
|
| | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \
| | |/ /
| |/| |
| | | |
| | | | |
Conflicts:
lib/cSig.mli
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
The Map interface of upcoming OCaml 4.03 includes a new union operator. In
order to make our homemade implementation of Maps compatible with OCaml
versions from 3.12 to 4.03, we define our own signatures for Maps.
|
|\| | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Note: they do not even seem to have a debugging purpose, so better remove
them before they bitrot.
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
The side-effects can contain universe declarations needed to typecheck
later proofs, which weren't added to the env used to typecheck them.
|
|\| | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| |/ /
|/| | |
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
The previous behavior was to include the interface of such a functor,
possibly leading to the creation of unexpected axioms, see bug report #3746.
In the case of non-functor module with restricted signature, we could
simply refer to the original objects (strengthening), but for a functor,
the inner objects have no existence yet. As said in the new error message,
a simple workaround is hence to first instantiate the functor, then include
the local instance:
Module LocalInstance := Funct(Args).
Include LocalInstance.
By the way, the mod_type_alg field is now filled more systematically,
cf new comments in declarations.mli. This way, we could use it to know
whether a module had been given a restricted signature (via ":"). Earlier,
some mod_type_alg were None in situations not handled by the extraction
(MEapply of module type).
Some code refactoring on the fly.
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
typing. Had built the instance for substitution in the wrong context.
|
|\| | |
|
| | | |
|
|\| | |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
- prod_applist
- prod_applist_assum
- lambda_applist
- lambda_applist_assum
expect an instance matching the quantified context. They are now in
term.ml, with "list" being possibly "vect".
Names are a bit arbitrary. Better propositions are welcome. They are
put in term.ml in that reduction is after all not needed, because the
intent is not to do β or ι on the fly but rather to substitute a λΓ.c
or ∀Γ.c (seen as internalization of a Γ⊢c) into one step,
independently of the idea of reducing.
On the other side:
- beta_applist
- beta_appvect
are seen as optimizations of application doing reduction on the fly
only if possible. They are then kept as functions relevant for
reduction.ml.
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
to c71aa6b and 6ababf) so as to rely on generic functions rather than
re-doing the de Bruijn indices cooking locally.
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
It will later be used to fix a bug and improve some code.
Interestingly, there were a redundant semantic equivalent to
extended_rel_list in the kernel called local_rels, and another private
copy of extended_rel_list in exactly the same file.
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Redefining adjust_subst_to_rel_context from instantiate_context who
was hidden in inductiveops.ml, renamed the latter into
subst_of_rel_context_instance and moving them to Vars. The new name
highlights that the input is an instance (as for applist) and the
output a substitution (as for substl). This is a clearer unified
interface, centralizing the difficult de-Bruijn job in one place. It
saves a couple of List.rev.
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Related questions:
- What balance to find between precision and conciseness?
- What convention to follow for typesetting the different components
of the documentation is unclear?
New tentative type substl to emphasize that substitutions (for substl)
are represented the other way round compared to instances for
application (applist), though there are represented the same way
(i.e. most recent/dependent component on top) as instances of evars
(mkEvar).
Also removing unused subst*_named_decl functions (at least
substnl_named_decl is somehow non-sense).
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
next to each other, waiting for possible integration into a more
uniform API.
|