| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
This will allow to merge back `Names` with `API.Names`
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch splits pretty printing representation from IO operations.
- `Pp` is kept in charge of the abstract pretty printing representation.
- The `Feedback` module provides interface for doing printing IO.
The patch continues work initiated for 8.5 and has the following effects:
- The following functions in `Pp`: `pp`, `ppnl`, `pperr`, `pperrnl`,
`pperr_flush`, `pp_flush`, `flush_all`, `msg`, `msgnl`, `msgerr`,
`msgerrnl`, `message` are removed. `Feedback.msg_*` functions must be
used instead.
- Feedback provides different backends to handle output, currently,
`stdout`, `emacs` and CoqIDE backends are provided.
- Clients cannot specify flush policy anymore, thus `pp_flush` et al are
gone.
- `Feedback.feedback` takes an `edit_or_state_id` instead of the old
mix.
Lightly tested: Test-suite passes, Proof General and CoqIDE seem to work.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Fixes #4139 (Not_found exception with Require in modules).
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
After this commit, module_type_body is a particular case of module_type.
For a [module_type_body], the implementation field [mod_expr] is
supposed to be always [Abstract]. This is verified by coqchk, even
if this isn't so crucial, since [mod_expr] is never read in the case
of a module type.
Concretely, this amounts to the following rewrite on field names
for module_type_body:
- typ_expr --> mod_type
- typ_expr_alg --> mod_type_alg
- typ_* --> mod_*
and adding two new fields to mtb:
- mod_expr (always containing Abstract)
- mod_retroknowledge (always containing [])
This refactoring should be completely transparent for the user.
Pros: code sharing, for instance subst_modtype = subst_module.
Cons: a runtime invariant (mod_expr = Abstract) which isn't
enforced by typing. I tried a polymorphic typing of mod_expr,
to share field names while not having mtb = mb, but the OCaml
typechecker isn't clever enough with polymorphic mutual fixpoints,
and reject code sharing (e.g. between subst_modtype and subst_module).
In the future (with ocaml>=4), some GADT could maybe help here,
but for now the current solution seems good enough.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
For now, this reference (renamed to link_info) has been moved to the
environment (for constants and inductive types). But this is only a first step
towards making the native compiler more functional.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The earlier type [struct_expr_body] was far too broad,
leading to code with unclear invariants, many "assert false", etc etc.
Its replacement [module_alg_expr] has only three constructors:
* MEident
* MEapply : note the module_path as 2nd arg, no more constraints here
* MEwith : no more constant_body inside, constr is just fine
But no more SEBfunctor or SEBstruct constructor here (see below).
This way, this datatype corresponds to algebraic expressions,
i.e. anything that can appear in non-interactive modules.
In fact, it even coincides now with [Entries.module_struct_entry].
- Functor constructors are now necessarily on top of other
structures thanks to a generic [functorize] datatype.
- Structures are now separated from algebraic expressions by design :
the [mod_type] and [typ_expr] fields now only contain structures
(or functorized structures), while [mod_type_alg] and [typ_expr_alg]
are restricted to algebraic expressions only.
- Only the implementation field [mod_expr] could be either algebraic
or structural. We handle this via a specialized datatype
[module_implementation] with four constructors:
* Abstract : no implementation (cf. for instance Declare Module)
* Algebraic(_) : for non-interactive modules, e.g. Module M := N.
* Struct(_) : for interactive module, e.g. Module M : T. ... End M.
* FullStruct : for interactive module with no type restriction.
The [FullStruct] is a particular case of [Struct] where the implementation
need not be stored at all, since it is exactly equal to its expanded
type present in [mod_type]. This is less fragile than hoping as earlier
that pointer equality between [mod_type] and [mod_expr] will be
preserved...
- We clearly emphasize that only [mod_type] and [typ_expr] are
relevant for the kernel, while [mod_type_alg] and [typ_expr_alg]
are there only for a nicer extraction and shorter module printing.
[mod_expr] is also not accessed by the kernel, but it is important
for Print Assumptions later.
- A few implicit invariants remain, for instance "no MEwith in mod_expr",
see the final comment in Declarations
- Heavy refactoring of module-related files : modops, mod_typing,
safe_typing, declaremods, extraction/extract_env.ml ...
- Coqchk has been adapted accordingly. The code concerning MEwith
in Mod_checking is now gone, since we cannot have any in mod_expr.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@16712 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
variables in the generated code.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@16619 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
| |
|
|
| |
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@16363 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
|
native OCaml code.
Warning: the "retroknowledge" mechanism has not been ported to the native
compiler, because integers and persistent arrays will ultimately be defined as
primitive constructions. Until then, computation on numbers may be faster using
the VM, since it takes advantage of machine integers.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@16136 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
Théo Zimmermann
Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias
Pierre-Marie Pédrot
Maxime Dénès
Pierre Letouzey
letouzey
mdenes