| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
| |
|
|\ |
|
| | |
|
|\| |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|\| |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Collecting the bound variables is now done on the glob_constr, before
interpretation, so that only variables given explicitly by the user
are used for binding bound variables.
|
|\| |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
We artificially restrict the syntax though, because it is unclear of
what the semantics of several axioms in a row is, in particular about the
resolution of remaining evars.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
- "Proof using p*" means: use p and any section var about p.
- Simplify the grammar/parser for proof using <expression>.
- Section variables with a body (let-in) are pulled in automatically
since they are safe to be used (add no extra quantification)
- automatic clear of "unused" section variables made optional:
Set Proof Using Clear Unused.
since clearing section hypotheses does not "always work" (e.g. hint
databases are not really cleaned)
- term_typing: trigger a "suggest proof using" message also for Let
theorems.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
These options can be set to a string value, but also unset.
Internal data is of type string option.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This option disallows "declare at first use" semantics for universe
variables (in @{}), forcing the declaration of _all_ universes appearing
in a definition when introducing it with syntax Definition/Inductive
foo@{i j k} .. The bound universes at the end of a definition/inductive
must be exactly those ones, no extras allowed currently.
Test-suite files using the old semantics just disable the option.
|
|\| |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
... lemmas and inductives to control which universes are bound and where
in universe polymorphic definitions. Names stay outside the kernel.
|
|\| |
|
| | |
|
|\| |
|
| | |
|
|\| |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|\| |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The command [Redirect "filename" (...)] redirects all the output of
[(...)] to file "filename.out". This is useful for storing the results of
an [Eval compute], for redirecting the results of a large search, for
automatically generating traces of interesting developments, and so on.
|
|\| |
|
| | |
|
|\| |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Of course such proofs cannot be processed asynchronously
|
|\| |
|
| | |
|
|/
|
|
|
| |
This will allow to get rid of the fragile mechanism of discriminating which
entry to call depending on the dynamic type of its arguments.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
there is no focused goal.
The 'g' is for "global". The arguments are the same as [fail]. Beware: [let x := constr:… in tac] is a goal-local operation regardless of whether [tac] is goal-local or not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This was due to the unqualified uses of "Lazy" being disambiguated in different manners. I just changed the constructor name to "Select".
Fixes #3877.
|
|
|
|
| |
[multimatch … with …] returns every possible successes: every matching branch and every successes of these matching branch, so that subsequent tactics can backtrack as well.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
[tryif t then t2 else t3] behaves like [t;t2] if [t] has at least one success, or [t3] otherwise. It generalises [t||t3] as failures from [t2] will not be caught.
|
|
|
|
| |
You can write 'simpl -[plus minus] div2'. Simpl does not use it for now.
|
|
|
|
| |
Documentation also updated.
|
|
|
|
| |
pattern-matching predicate.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
reference" and "simpl pattern" in the code (maybe we should have
merged them instead, but I finally decided to enforce their
difference, even if some compatibility is to be preversed - the idea
is that at some time "simpl reference" would only call a weak-head
simpl (or eventually cbn), leading e.g. to reduce 2+n into S(1+n)
rather than S(S(n)) which could be useful for better using induction
hypotheses.
In the process we also implement the following:
- 'simpl "+"' is accepted to reduce all applicative subterms whose
head symbol is written "+" (in the toplevel scope); idem for
vm_compute and native_compute
- 'simpl reference' works even if reference has maximally inserted
implicit arguments (this solves the "simpl fst" incompatibility)
- compatibility of ltac expressions referring to vm_compute and
native_compute with functor application should now work (i.e.
vm_compute and native_compute are now taken into account in
tacsubst.ml)
- for compatibility, "simpl eq" (assuming no maximal implicit args in
eq) or "simpl @eq" to mean "simpl (eq _ _)" are still allowed.
By the way, is "mul" on nat defined optimally? "3*n" simplifies to
"n+(n+(n+0))". Are there some advantages of this compared to have it
simplified to "n+n+n" (i.e. to "(n+n)+n").
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Re-add, in fact, since it was there in v8.3 but was dead code in v8.4 hence was deleted. It is necessary for printing info traces, however. A lot of the code had changed since v8.3, so adapting the code was non-trivial and some thing may be printed wrong.
It require re-adding a [tacexpr] argument to [gen_tactic_expr]. It had been made obsolete by the deletion of [pr_tactic] in v8.4 (even though printing [glob_tactic_expr] in a [tactic_expr] is only an approximation of the appropriate behaviour).
A new kind of argument, [delayed_constr], has made an appearance between v8.4 and trunk, and it differs from [constr] in the typed level. So it required its own parameter in [gen_tactic_expr]. At this point [delayed_constr] are printed in the globalised level because they are interpreted as closures. Maybe a better approximation is warranted.
Both in the printing of rewrite and induction, I changed a [pr_lconstr] (note the 'l') by a [pr_dconstr]. It is probably not quite correct, and may need fixing (adding a [pr_dlconstr] to [Pptactics] I guess?).
|
|
|
|
| |
Called with [Info n tac], runs [tac] and prints its info trace unfolding [n] level of tactic names ([0] for no unfolding at all).
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PIDE based GUIs can take advantage of multiple panels and get
some feedback routed there. E.g. query panel
|