Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
... | ||||
| * | GRAMMAR: added punctuation | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | CLEANUP PROPOSITION: rephrasing the original idea in a simpler way | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | CLEANUP PROPOSITION: existing example was removed because it is not urgently ↵ | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | | | | | | | needed | |||
| * | ENH: existing example was changed so that it is now linked to the results ↵ | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | | | | | | | shown in the previous example | |||
| * | ENH: an existing example was further expanded. | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | CLEANUP: Existing example was removed. | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | We have expanded the example above. For consistency reasons, it would make sense to do the same also for this example. However, due to the size of the terms, it is hard to typeset it nicely. I propose to remove it. | |||
| * | ENH: existing example was expanded | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | ENH: define the meaning of 'p' | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | CLEANUP PROPOSITION: does it make sense to refer to 'I' as 'inductive ↵ | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | | | | | | | definition'? Doesn't make more sense to refer to it as 'inductive type'? | |||
| * | CLEANUP: We decided to call these guys E[Γ] ⊢ (Γi := Γc) as inductive ↵ | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | | | | | | | definition. | |||
| * | COMMENT: question | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | CLEANUP: removing a superfluous index | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | COMMENT: question | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | COMMENT: question | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | GRAMMAR | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | COMMENT: note | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | TYPOGRAPHY | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | CLEANUP: originally, we talked about "B" as an "arity" | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | COMMENT: question | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | ENH: a forward reference to a place where the concept of "allowed ↵ | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | | | | | | | elimination sorts" is actually used | |||
| * | COMMENT: question | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | CLEANUP: unnecessary | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | GRAMMAR | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | COMMENT: question | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | ENH: improving precision | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | COMMENT: question | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | FIX: "u_p" was not defined | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | CLEANUP: removing duplicate paragraph | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | COMMENT: question | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | COMMENT: question | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | COMMENT: questions and to do | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | FIX: removing references to Γ which is not defined in a given context | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | TYPESETTING | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | COMMENT: question | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | GRAMMAR | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | CLEANUP PROPOSITION: superfluous parentheses were removed | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | CLEANUP PROPOSITION: s/local context of parameters/context of parameters | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | COMMENT: question | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | COMMENT: question | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | COMMENT: questions | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | COMMENT: to do | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | COMMENT: to do | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | FIX: removing a reference to \Gamma, because it is undefined | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | COMMENT: question | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | FIX: making sure that my previous edits do not break HTML generation | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | COMMENT: questions | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | ENH: examples for 'strict positivity' were expanded | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | COMMENT: question | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | CLEANUP: s/List_A/List~A/g | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | ||||
| * | COMMENT: question | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | |