| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
scheme, redundancies, possibility of chaining a tactic knowing the
name of introduced hypothesis, new proof engine).
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- emphasizing the different kinds of patterns
- factorizing code of the non-naming intro-patterns
Still some questions:
- Should -> and <- apply to hypotheses or not (currently they apply to
hypotheses either when used in assert-style tactics or apply in, or
when the term to rewrite is a variable, in which case "subst" is
applied)?
- Should "subst" be used when the -> or <- rewrites an equation x=t
posed by "assert" (i.e. rewrite everywhere and clearing x and hyp)?
- Should -> and <- be applicable in non assert-style if the lemma has
quantifications?
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- realargs: refers either to the indices of an inductive, or to the proper args
of a constructor
- params: refers to parameters (which are common to inductive and constructors)
- allargs = params + realargs
- realdecls: refers to the defining context of indices or proper args
of a constructor (it includes letins)
- paramdecls: refers to the defining context of params (it includes letins)
- alldecls = paramdecls + realdecls
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
into a specific new cleaned file find_subterm.ml.
This makes things clearer but also solves some dependencies problem
between Evd, Termops and Pretype_errors.
|
| |
|
|
| |
which compute an abstraction of the goal over a term or a pattern.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Clarification of the existence of three algorithms for solving
unconstrained evars:
- the type-class mechanism
- the heuristics for solving pending conversion problems and multi-candidates
- Declare Implicit Tactic (when called from tactics)
Main function for solving unconstrained evars (when not using
understand): Pretyping.solve_remaining_evars
- Clarification of the existence of three corresponding kinds of
errors when reporting about unsolved evars:
Main function for checking resolution of evars independently of the
understand functions: Pretyping.check_evars_are_solved
- Introduction of inference flags in pretyping for governing which
combination of the algorithms to use when calling some understand
function; there is also a flag of expanding or not evars and for
requiring or not the resolution of all evars
- Less hackish way of managing Pretyping.type_constraint: all three
different possibilities are now represented by three different
constructors
- Main semantical changes done:
- solving unconstrained evars and reporting is not any longer mixed:
one first tries to find unconstrained evars by any way possible;
one eventually reports on the existence of unsolved evars using
check_evars_are_solved
- checking unsolved evars is now done by looking at the evar map,
not by looking at the evars occurring in the terms to pretype; the
only observed consequence so far is in Cases.v because of subterms
(surprisingly) disappering after compilation of pattern-matching
- the API changed, see dev/doc/changes.txt
Still to do:
- Find more uniform naming schemes:
- for distinguishing when sigma is passed as a reference or as a value
(are used: suffix _evars, prefix e_)
- for distinguishing when evars are allowed to remain uninstantiated or not
(are used: suffix _evars, again, suffix _tcc, infix _open_)
- be more consistent on the use of names evd/sigma/evars or evdref/evars
- By the way, shouldn't "understand" be better renamed into "infer" or
"preinfer", or "pretype". Grammatically, "understanding a term" looks
strange.
- Investigate whether the inference flags in tacinterp.ml are really
what we want (e.g. do we really want that heuristic remains
activated when typeclasses are explicitly deactivated, idem in
Tacinterp.interp_open_constr where flags are strange).
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@16499 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
| |
|
|
| |
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@15393 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
for the functions of unification.ml.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@14547 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
| |
|
|
| |
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@13834 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Arguments bound with tactic(_) in TACTIC EXTEND rules are now of type
glob_tactic_expr, instead of glob_tactic_expr * tactic. Only the first
component is kept, the second one can be obtained with
Tacinterp.eval_tactic.
Rationale: these declare parsing rules, and eval_tactic is a semantic
action, and therefore should be done in the rule body
instead. Moreover, having the glob_tactic_expr and its evaluation
captured by these rules was quite confusing IMHO.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@13480 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
| |
|
|
| |
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@13311 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
them. This was the cause of the failure of compilation of
CyclicAxioms after "replace" starting supporting open constrs (r13206).
Seized the opportunity to clean a little bit things around nf_evar,
whd_evar, check_evars, etc.
Removed obsolete printer mod_self_id from dev/db.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@13214 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
checking function was used instead of a test of existence in the context.
Also restricted constr_of_id which had no reason to interpret a
posteriori an already interpreted identifier as a global
reference. Consequently adapted funind.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@13135 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
swap in the evar flags and the isrec flag. (e.g. "induction" was
printed "edestruct").
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@13124 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
evar_map into a map for defined evars and a map for undefined evars.
Even before Spiwack's new proof engine, some Evd.fold were very
costly, e.g. in check_evars or progress_evar_map. With the new proof
engine, undefined evars traversals are apparently even more common (at
least, it improves significantly the complexity of some calls to omega
in JordanCurveTheorem - a new factor 5-7 after the factor 5-6 obtained
by removal of evar_merge in clenv_fchain in commit 13007, arriving to
figures comparable to the 8.3 ones).
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@13011 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ML names
(late consequences of commit r12603)
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@12934 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to rawconstr
Also cleaned a bit typing.ml
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@12902 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
| |
|
|
| |
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@12485 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Cleaning and uniformisation in command.ml:
- For better modularity and better visibility, two files got isolated
out of command.ml:
- lemmas.ml is about starting and saving a proof
- indschemes.ml is about declaring inductive schemes
- Decomposition of the functions of command.ml into a functional part
and the imperative part
- Inductive schemes:
- New architecture in ind_tables.ml for registering scheme builders,
and for sharing and generating on demand inductive schemes
- Adding new automatically generated equality schemes (file eqschemes.ml)
- "_congr" for equality types (completing here commit 12273)
- "_rew_forward" (similar to vernac-level eq_rect_r), "_rew_forward_dep",
"_rew_backward" (similar to eq_rect), "_rew_backward_dep" for
rewriting schemes (warning, rew_forward_dep cannot be stated following
the standard Coq pattern for inductive types: "t=u" cannot be the
last argument of the scheme)
- "_case", "_case_nodep", "_case_dep" for case analysis schemes
- Preliminary step towards discriminate and injection working on any
equality-like type (e.g. eq_true)
- Restating JMeq_congr under the canonical form of congruence schemes
- Renamed "Set Equality Scheme" into "Set Equality Schemes"
- Added "Set Rewriting Schemes", "Set Case Analysis Schemes"
- Activation of the automatic generation of boolean equality lemmas
- Partial debug and error messages improvements for the generation of
boolean equality and decidable equality
- Added schemes for making dependent rewrite working (unfortunately with
not a fully satisfactory design - see file eqschemes.ml)
- Some names of ML function made more regular (see dev/doc/changes.txt)
- Incidentally, added a flush to obsolete Local/Global syntax warning
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@12481 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(uniformisation of function names, classification). One of the most
visible change is the renaming of section_path into full_path (the
use of name section was obsolete due to the module system, but I
don't know if the new name is the best chosen one - especially it
remains some "sp" here and there).
- Simplification of the interface of classify_object (first argument dropped).
- Simplification of the code for vernac keyword "End".
- Other small cleaning or dead code removal.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@12265 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
as hints (see wish #2104).
- New type hint_entry for interpreted hint.
- Better centralization of functions dealing with evaluable_global_reference.
- Unfortunately, camlp4 does not factorize rules so that "Hint Resolve" had
uglily to be factorized by hand.
- Typography in RefMan-tac.tex.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@12121 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
reorganization of code) and documentation (in pcoq.mli) of the code
for parsing extensions (TACTIC/VERNAC/ARGUMENT EXTEND, Tactic
Notation, Notation); merged the two copies of interp_entry_name to
avoid they diverge.
- Added support in Tactic Notation for ne_..._list_sep in general and
for (ne_)ident_list(_sep) in particular.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@12108 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
user contribs
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@11996 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
| |
|
|
| |
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@11990 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
| |
|
|
| |
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@11980 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Adding ability to use "_" in syntax for binders (as in "exists _:nat, True").
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@11804 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Backtrack on precise unfolding of "iff" in "tauto": it has effects on
the naming of hypotheses (especially when doing "case H" with H of
type "{x|P<->Q}" since not unfolding will eventually introduce a name
"i" while unfolding will eventually introduce a name "a" (deep sigh).
- Miscellaneous (error when a plugin is missing, doc hnf, standardization
of names manipulating type constr_pattern, ...).
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@11725 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Added "simple apply in" (cf wish 1917) + conversion and descent
under conjunction + contraction of useless beta-redex in "apply in"
+ support for open terms.
- Did not solve the "problem" that "apply in" generates a let-in which
is type-checked using a kernel conversion in the opposite side of what
the proof indicated (hence leading to a potential unexpected penalty
at Qed time).
- When applyng a sequence of lemmas, it would have been nice to allow
temporary evars as intermediate steps but this was too long to implement.
Smoother API in tactics.mli for assert_by/assert_as/pose_proof.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@11662 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
| |
|
|
| |
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@11102 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- MAJ CHANGES et COMPATIBILITY
- Réservation de || et && dans Notations.v
- code mort et MAJ suite commit 11072 (tactics.ml et changes.txt)
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@11073 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Ajout clause "in" à "remember" (et passage du code en ML).
- Ajout clause "in" à "induction"/"destruct" qui, en ce cas, ajoute
aussi une égalité pour se souvenir du terme sur lequel l'induction
ou l'analyse de cas s'applique.
- Ajout "pose t as id" en standard (Matthieu: j'ai enlevé celui de
Programs qui avait la sémantique de "pose proof" tandis que le nouveau
a la même sémantique que "pose (id:=t)").
- Un peu de réorganisation, uniformisation de noms dans Arith, et
ajout EqNat dans Arith.
- Documentation tactiques et notations de tactiques.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@11072 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
du filtrage. Cela permet de détecter les cas impossibles et de simuler
les contraintes d'inversion exprimables sous la forme d'un assignement
des arguments du constructeurs (cf le cas de Vtail dans Bvector.v).
Si l'on filtre sur t:I u1 .. un, et que chaque ui a la forme vi(wi)
avec vi composé uniquement de constructeurs, et que le résultat final
est P(w1,...,wn) (qui est éventuellement lui-même une evar) alors on
construit le prédicat
Q:=fun x1 .. xn y =>
match x1 .. xn y with
| v1(z) .. vn(z) t => P(z)
| _ .. _ _ => ?evar-speciale-cas-impossible
end
qui vérifiera bien que Q u1 .. un = P(w1,..,wp).
En raison de limitations de l'unification (on aurait besoin d'eta
conversion pour résoudre des problèmes du genre
"terme rigide == match x with _ => ?evar end", et besoin d'instanciation par
constructeurs pour des cas comme "A(y) = match ?evar with C x => A(x) end"),
je n'ai pas réussi à traiter le cas général.
Aussi, on adopte une stratégie pragmatique consistant à tester
plusieurs prédicats possibles :
- si un type final est donné, on essaie d'abord l'algorithme de
Matthieu et sinon le nouvel algorithme (permet par exemple de traiter
certains cas d'élimination dépendante de Bvector.v),
- s'il n'y a pas de type final, on essaie d'abord le nouvel algo et
sinon, on essaie avec un prédicat sans dépendance (permet de traiter
des cas compliqués comme celui de par cas sur I' dans le fichier
Case13.v de la test-suite).
Dans la pratique, il y a beaucoup de changement dans le code de compile_case.
- Par exemple, la compilation est maintenant toujours appelé avec un
prédicat (là où l'on pouvait avoir None, on a maintenant toujours au
moins une evar).
- En revanche, le membre droit des clauses est maintenant
optionnel. Si c'est None, c'est qu'on se trouve dans le cas d'une
branche impossible au moment du calcul du prédicat de retour.
- Aussi, on renonce aux PrLetIn et PrProd dans l'expression du
predicat de retour mais il faut savoir que c'est maintenant la liste
des tomatchs qui spécifie le contexte exact dans lequel le prédicat
de retour est bien typé.
- Et d'autres...
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@10883 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(i.e. "Inductive unit := tt." conduisait à "t:Prop" alors que le
principe de la hiérarchie d'univers est d'être cumulative -- et que
Set en soit le niveau 0).
Une solution aurait été de poser Prop <= Set mais on adopte une autre
solution. Pour éviter le côté contre-intuitif d'avoir unit dans Type
et Prop <= Set, on garde la représentation de Prop au sein de la
hiérarchie prédicative sous la forme "Type (max ([],[])" (le niveau
sans aucune contrainte inférieure, appelons Type -1) et on adapte les
fonctions de sous-typage et de typage pour qu'elle prenne en compte la
règle Type -1 <= Prop (cf reduction.ml, reductionops.ml, et effets
incidents dans Termops.refresh_universes et Univ.super).
Petite uniformisation des noms d'univers et de sortes au passage
(univ.ml, univ.mli, term.ml, term.mli et les autres fichiers).
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@10859 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fusion des syntaxes de "apply" et "eapply". Ajout de "eapply in",
"erewrite" et "erewrite in". Correction au passage des bugs #1461 et
#1522).
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@9802 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(les let-in étaient comptés comme des produits, introduisant une incohérence
sur le nombre de produits à instancier dans les lemmes appelés par apply).
- Export simplest_eapply pour utilisation dans Sophia/RecursiveDefinition.
- Doc développeur
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@9785 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
| |
|
|
| |
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@8946 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
| |
|
|
| |
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@8857 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
|
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@8856 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
Pierre Letouzey
Hugo Herbelin
herbelin
letouzey
glondu