| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| ... | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- no more inconsistent Axiom in the Prelude
- STM can now process Admitted proofs asynchronously
- the quick chain can stock "Admitted" jobs in .vio files
- the vio2vo step checks the jobs but does not stock the result
in the opaque tables (they have no slot)
- Admitted emits a warning if the proof is complete
- Admitted uses the (partial) proof term to infer section variables
used (if not given with Proof using), like for Qed
- test-suite: extra line Require TestSuite.admit to each file making
use of admit
- test-suite/_CoqProject: to pass to CoqIDE and PG the right -Q flag to
find TestSuite.admit
|
| |
|
|
| |
r15439 as we were talking at that time)
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Only tactics are taken into account.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
a line on "Intuition Negation Unfolding".
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
etc. (source of incompatibility).
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
- gfail
- multimatch
- tryif/then/else
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Had to put some hook in the handler of Proofview.NoSuchgoals.
Documentation updated. CHANGE updated.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Documentation also updated.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
semantics described in the reference manual (i.e. if "f" is a qualid,
do not add implicit arguments and, a fortiori, do not try to solve
these implicit arguments - in particular, changing DbLib which
expected this rule not to be followed).
|
| |
|
|
| |
"simpl at" and "change at".
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
reference" and "simpl pattern" in the code (maybe we should have
merged them instead, but I finally decided to enforce their
difference, even if some compatibility is to be preversed - the idea
is that at some time "simpl reference" would only call a weak-head
simpl (or eventually cbn), leading e.g. to reduce 2+n into S(1+n)
rather than S(S(n)) which could be useful for better using induction
hypotheses.
In the process we also implement the following:
- 'simpl "+"' is accepted to reduce all applicative subterms whose
head symbol is written "+" (in the toplevel scope); idem for
vm_compute and native_compute
- 'simpl reference' works even if reference has maximally inserted
implicit arguments (this solves the "simpl fst" incompatibility)
- compatibility of ltac expressions referring to vm_compute and
native_compute with functor application should now work (i.e.
vm_compute and native_compute are now taken into account in
tacsubst.ml)
- for compatibility, "simpl eq" (assuming no maximal implicit args in
eq) or "simpl @eq" to mean "simpl (eq _ _)" are still allowed.
By the way, is "mul" on nat defined optimally? "3*n" simplifies to
"n+(n+(n+0))". Are there some advantages of this compared to have it
simplified to "n+n+n" (i.e. to "(n+n)+n").
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
local definitions...
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The main change is that selection of subterm is made similar whether
the given term is fully applied or not.
- The selection of subterm now works as follows depending on whether
the "at" is given, of whether the subterm is fully applied or not,
and whether there are incompatible subterms matching the pattern. In
particular, we have:
"at" given
| subterm fully applied
| | incompatible subterms
| | |
Y Y - it works like in 8.4
Y N - this was broken in 8.4 ("at" was ineffective and it was finding
all subterms syntactically equal to the first one which matches)
N Y Y it now finds all subterms like the first one which matches
while in 8.4 it used to fail (I hope it is not a too risky in-draft
for a semantics we would regret...) (e.g. "destruct (S _)" on
goal "S x = S y + S x" now selects the two occurrences of "S x"
while it was failing before)
N Y N it works like in 8.4
N N - it works like in 8.4, selecting all subterms like the
first one which matches
- Note that the "historical" semantics, when looking for a subterm, to
select all subterms that syntactically match the first subterm to
match the pattern (looking from left to right) is now internally called
"like first".
- Selection of subterms can now find the type by pattern-matching (useful e.g.
for "induction (nat_rect _ _ _ _)")
- A version of Unification.w_unify w/o any conversion is used for
finding the subterm: it could be easily replaced by an other
matching algorithm.
In particular, "destruct H" now works on a goal such as "H:True -> x<=y |- P y".
Secondary change is in the interpretation of terms with existential
variables:
- When several arguments are given, interpretation is delayed at the
time of execution
- Because we aim at eventually accepting "edestruct c" with unresolved
holes in c, we need the sigma obtained from c to be an extension of
the sigma of the tactics, while before, we just type-checked c
independently of the sigma of the tactic
- Finishing the resolution of evars (using type classes, candidates,
pending conversion problems) is made slightly cleaner: it now takes
three states: a term is evaluated in state sigma, leading to state
sigma' >= sigma, with evars finally solved in state sigma'' >=
sigma'; we solve evars in the diff of sigma' and sigma and report
the solution in sigma''
- We however renounce to give now a success semantics to "edestruct c"
when "c" has unresolved holes, waiting instead for a decision on
what to do in the case of a similar eapply (see mail to coqdev).
An auxiliary change is that an "in" clause can be attached to each component
of a "destruct t, u, v", etc.
Incidentally, make_abstraction does not do evar resolution itself any longer.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
introduction patterns).
Whether we call -> and <- from assert as or apply in as, or as a
component of a larger introduction pattern, the new documented
semantics is:
- behave as subst if an equation rewriting a variable (rewrite in
conclusion and hyps and erase variable and hyp).
- rewrite in concl if an equation not rewrite a variable or a
quantified equality, then erase the hypothesis.
This is potential source of incompatibilities.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Ltac-defined names in term binders.
Closes #3747.
|
| |
|
|
| |
(interpreting "match goal"'s hypotheses in scope %type).
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
in69665dd2480d364162933972de7ffa955eccab4d. There are still situations
when "as" is not given where equations coming from injection are not
yet removed, making invalid the computation of dependencies, what
prevents an hypothesis to be cleared and replaced.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
engine.
|
Enrico Tassi
Pierre Boutillier
Arnaud Spiwack
Guillaume Melquiond
Hugo Herbelin
Matthieu Sozeau
Maxime Dénès
Pierre-Marie Pédrot
Matthieu Sozeau
Pierre Courtieu