Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
... | ||||
* | CLEANUP PROPOSITION: does it make sense to refer to 'I' as 'inductive ↵ | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | | | definition'? Doesn't make more sense to refer to it as 'inductive type'? | |||
* | CLEANUP: We decided to call these guys E[Γ] ⊢ (Γi := Γc) as inductive ↵ | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | | | definition. | |||
* | COMMENT: question | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | CLEANUP: removing a superfluous index | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | COMMENT: question | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | COMMENT: question | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | GRAMMAR | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | COMMENT: note | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | TYPOGRAPHY | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | CLEANUP: originally, we talked about "B" as an "arity" | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | COMMENT: question | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | ENH: a forward reference to a place where the concept of "allowed ↵ | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | | | elimination sorts" is actually used | |||
* | COMMENT: question | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | CLEANUP: unnecessary | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | GRAMMAR | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | COMMENT: question | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | ENH: improving precision | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | COMMENT: question | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | FIX: "u_p" was not defined | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | CLEANUP: removing duplicate paragraph | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | COMMENT: question | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | COMMENT: question | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | COMMENT: questions and to do | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | FIX: removing references to Γ which is not defined in a given context | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | TYPESETTING | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | COMMENT: question | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | GRAMMAR | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | CLEANUP PROPOSITION: superfluous parentheses were removed | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | CLEANUP PROPOSITION: s/local context of parameters/context of parameters | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | COMMENT: question | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | COMMENT: question | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | COMMENT: questions | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | COMMENT: to do | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | COMMENT: to do | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | FIX: removing a reference to \Gamma, because it is undefined | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | COMMENT: question | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | FIX: making sure that my previous edits do not break HTML generation | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | COMMENT: questions | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | ENH: examples for 'strict positivity' were expanded | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | COMMENT: question | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | CLEANUP: s/List_A/List~A/g | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | COMMENT: question | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | CLEANUP: the definition of "type of constructor" was rephrased in order to ↵ | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | | | | make it more clear | |||
* | COMMENT: question | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | COMMENT: question | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | COMMENT: to do | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | FIX: commit 315f771 | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | CLEANUP: superfluous examples were removed | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | ENH: new example: "even" | 2015-12-10 | ||
| | ||||
* | ALPHA-CONVERSION: s/Length/has_length/g | 2015-12-10 | ||
| |