1 files changed, 192 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/test-suite/success/name_mangling.v b/test-suite/success/name_mangling.v
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..571dde880
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test-suite/success/name_mangling.v
@@ -0,0 +1,192 @@
+(* -*- coq-prog-args: ("-mangle-names" "_") -*- *)
+
+(* Check that refine policy of redefining previous names make these names private *)
+(* abstract can change names in the environment! See bug #3146 *)
+
+Goal True -> True.
+intro.
+Fail exact H.
+exact _0.
+Abort.
+
+Unset Mangle Names.
+Goal True -> True.
+intro; exact H.
+Abort.
+
+Set Mangle Names.
+Set Mangle Names Prefix "baz".
+Goal True -> True.
+intro.
+Fail exact H.
+Fail exact _0.
+exact baz0.
+Abort.
+
+Goal True -> True.
+intro; assumption.
+Abort.
+
+Goal True -> True.
+intro x; exact x.
+Abort.
+
+Goal forall x y, x+y=0.
+intro x.
+refine (fun x => _).
+Fail Check x0.
+Check x.
+Abort.
+
+(* Example from Emilio *)
+
+Goal forall b : False, b = b.
+intro b.
+refine (let b := I in _).
+Fail destruct b0.
+Abort.
+
+(* Example from Cyprien *)
+
+Goal True -> True.
+Proof.
+  refine (fun _ => _).
+  Fail exact t.
+Abort.
+
+(* Example from Jason *)
+
+Goal False -> False.
+intro H.
+Fail abstract exact H.
+Abort.
+
+(* Variant *)
+
+Goal False -> False.
+intro.
+Fail abstract exact H.
+Abort.
+
+(* Example from Jason *)
+
+Goal False -> False.
+intro H.
+(* Name H' is from Ltac here, so it preserves the privacy *)
+(* But abstract messes everything up *)
+Fail let H' := H in abstract exact H'.
+let H' := H in exact H'.
+Qed.
+
+(* Variant *)
+
+Goal False -> False.
+intro.
+Fail let H' := H in abstract exact H'.
+Abort.
+
+(* Indirectly testing preservation of names by move (derived from Jason) *)
+
+Inductive nat2 := S2 (_ _ : nat2).
+Goal forall t : nat2, True.
+  intro t.
+  let IHt1 := fresh "IHt1" in
+  let IHt2 := fresh "IHt2" in
+  induction t as [? IHt1 ? IHt2].
+  Fail exact IHt1.
+Abort.
+
+(* Example on "pose proof" (from Jason) *)
+
+Goal False -> False.
+intro; pose proof I as H0.
+Fail exact H.
+Abort.
+
+(* Testing the approach for which non alpha-renamed quantified names are user-generated *)
+
+Section foo.
+Context (b : True).
+Goal forall b : False, b = b.
+Fail destruct b0.
+Abort.
+
+Goal forall b : False, b = b.
+now destruct b.
+Qed.
+End foo.
+
+(* Test stability of "fix" *)
+
+Lemma a : forall n, n = 0.
+Proof.
+fix a 1.
+Check a.
+fix 1.
+Fail Check a0.
+Abort.
+
+(* Test stability of "induction" *)
+
+Lemma a : forall n : nat, n = n.
+Proof.
+intro n; induction n as [ | n IHn ].
+- auto.
+- Check n.
+  Check IHn.
+Abort.
+
+Inductive I := C : I -> I -> I.
+
+Lemma a : forall n : I, n = n.
+Proof.
+intro n; induction n as [ n1 IHn1 n2 IHn2 ].
+Check n1.
+Check n2.
+apply f_equal2.
++ apply IHn1.
++ apply IHn2.
+Qed.
+
+(* Testing remember *)
+
+Lemma c : 0 = 0.
+Proof.
+remember 0 as x eqn:Heqx.
+Check Heqx.
+Abort.
+
+Lemma c : forall Heqx, Heqx -> 0 = 0.
+Proof.
+intros Heqx X.
+remember 0 as x.
+Fail Check Heqx0. (* Heqx0 is not canonical *)
+Abort.
+
+(* An example by Jason from the discussion for PR #268 *)
+
+Goal nat -> Set -> True.
+  intros x y.
+  match goal with
+  | [ x : _, y : _ |- _ ]
+    => let z := fresh "z" in
+      rename y into z, x into y;
+        let x' := fresh "x" in
+        rename z into x'
+  end.
+  revert y. (* x has been explicitly moved to y *)
+  Fail revert x. (* x comes from "fresh" *)
+Abort.
+
+Goal nat -> Set -> True.
+  intros.
+  match goal with
+  | [ x : _, y : _ |- _ ]
+    => let z := fresh "z" in
+      rename y into z, x into y;
+        let x' := fresh "x" in
+        rename z into x'
+  end.
+  Fail revert y. (* generated by intros *)
+  Fail revert x. (* generated by intros *)
+Abort.