diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'test-suite/output')
| -rw-r--r-- | test-suite/output/Arguments_renaming.out | 6 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | test-suite/output/Cases.v | 1 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | test-suite/output/Notations3.out | 18 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | test-suite/output/Notations3.v | 21 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | test-suite/output/UnclosedBlocks.out | 1 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | test-suite/output/Unicode.out | 41 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | test-suite/output/Unicode.v | 28 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | test-suite/output/ltac.v | 3 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | test-suite/output/ssr_clear.out | 3 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | test-suite/output/ssr_clear.v | 6 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | test-suite/output/ssr_explain_match.out | 55 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | test-suite/output/ssr_explain_match.v | 23 |
12 files changed, 201 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/test-suite/output/Arguments_renaming.out b/test-suite/output/Arguments_renaming.out index e73312c67..c0b04eb53 100644 --- a/test-suite/output/Arguments_renaming.out +++ b/test-suite/output/Arguments_renaming.out @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ The command has indeed failed with message: -To rename arguments the "rename" flag must be specified. -Argument A renamed to B. +Flag "rename" expected to rename A into B. File "stdin", line 2, characters 0-25: Warning: This command is just asserting the names of arguments of identity. If this is what you want add ': assert' to silence the warning. If you want @@ -113,5 +112,4 @@ Argument z cannot be declared implicit. The command has indeed failed with message: Extra arguments: y. The command has indeed failed with message: -To rename arguments the "rename" flag must be specified. -Argument A renamed to R. +Flag "rename" expected to rename A into R. diff --git a/test-suite/output/Cases.v b/test-suite/output/Cases.v index caf3b2870..4740c009a 100644 --- a/test-suite/output/Cases.v +++ b/test-suite/output/Cases.v @@ -163,6 +163,7 @@ match goal with |- ?y + _ = _ => pose (match y as y with 0 => 0 | S n => 0 end) match goal with |- ?y + _ = _ => pose (match y as y return y=y with 0 => eq_refl | S n => eq_refl end) end. match goal with |- ?y + _ = _ => pose (match y return y=y with 0 => eq_refl | S n => eq_refl end) end. Show. +Abort. Lemma lem5 (p:nat) : eq_refl p = eq_refl p. let y := fresh "n" in (* Checking that y is hidden *) diff --git a/test-suite/output/Notations3.out b/test-suite/output/Notations3.out index 1987b6a6e..996af5927 100644 --- a/test-suite/output/Notations3.out +++ b/test-suite/output/Notations3.out @@ -223,3 +223,21 @@ fun S : nat => [[S | S.S]] : Set exists2 '{{y, z}} : nat * nat, y > z & z > y : Prop +foo = +fun l : list nat => match l with + | _ :: (_ :: _) as l1 => l1 + | _ => l + end + : list nat -> list nat + +Argument scope is [list_scope] +Notation +"'exists' x .. y , p" := ex (fun x => .. (ex (fun y => p)) ..) : type_scope +(default interpretation) +"'exists' ! x .. y , p" := ex + (unique + (fun x => .. (ex (unique (fun y => p))) ..)) +: type_scope (default interpretation) +Notation +"( x , y , .. , z )" := pair .. (pair x y) .. z : core_scope +(default interpretation) diff --git a/test-suite/output/Notations3.v b/test-suite/output/Notations3.v index c165f9553..3cf0c913f 100644 --- a/test-suite/output/Notations3.v +++ b/test-suite/output/Notations3.v @@ -278,10 +278,12 @@ Set Printing Notations. (* Check insensitivity of "match" clauses to order *) +Module IfPat. Notation "'if' t 'is' n .+ 1 'then' p 'else' q" := (match t with S n => p | 0 => q end) (at level 200). Check fun x => if x is n.+1 then n else 1. +End IfPat. (* Examples with binding patterns *) @@ -338,11 +340,13 @@ Check ∀ '(((x,y),true)|((x,y),false)), x>y. (* Check Georges' printability of a "if is then else" notation *) +Module IfPat2. Notation "'if' c 'is' p 'then' u 'else' v" := (match c with p => u | _ => v end) (at level 200, p pattern at level 100). Check fun p => if p is S n then n else 0. Check fun p => if p is Lt then 1 else 0. +End IfPat2. (* Check that mixed binders and terms defaults to ident and not pattern *) Module F. @@ -364,3 +368,20 @@ Check {'(x,y)|x+y=0}. (* Check exists2 with a pattern *) Check ex2 (fun x => let '(y,z) := x in y>z) (fun x => let '(y,z) := x in z>y). + +Module Issue7110. +Open Scope list_scope. +Notation "[ :: x1 , x2 , .. , xn & s ]" := (x1 :: x2 :: .. (xn :: s) ..) + (at level 0). +Definition foo (l : list nat) := + match l with + | a :: (b :: l) as l1 => l1 + | _ => l +end. +Print foo. +End Issue7110. + +Module LocateNotations. +Locate "exists". +Locate "( _ , _ , .. , _ )". +End LocateNotations. diff --git a/test-suite/output/UnclosedBlocks.out b/test-suite/output/UnclosedBlocks.out index b83e94ad4..31481e84a 100644 --- a/test-suite/output/UnclosedBlocks.out +++ b/test-suite/output/UnclosedBlocks.out @@ -1,3 +1,2 @@ - Error: The section Baz, module type Bar and module Foo need to be closed. diff --git a/test-suite/output/Unicode.out b/test-suite/output/Unicode.out new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a57b3bbad --- /dev/null +++ b/test-suite/output/Unicode.out @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ +1 subgoal + + very_very_long_type_name1 : Type + very_very_long_type_name2 : Type + f : very_very_long_type_name1 → very_very_long_type_name2 → Prop + ============================ + True + → True + → ∀ (x : very_very_long_type_name1) (y : very_very_long_type_name2), + f x y ∧ f x y ∧ f x y ∧ f x y ∧ f x y ∧ f x y +1 subgoal + + very_very_long_type_name1 : Type + very_very_long_type_name2 : Type + f : very_very_long_type_name1 → very_very_long_type_name2 → Prop + ============================ + True + → True + → ∀ (x : very_very_long_type_name2) (y : very_very_long_type_name1) + (z : very_very_long_type_name2), f y x ∧ f y z +1 subgoal + + very_very_long_type_name1 : Type + very_very_long_type_name2 : Type + f : very_very_long_type_name1 → very_very_long_type_name2 → Prop + ============================ + True + → True + → ∀ (x : very_very_long_type_name2) (y : very_very_long_type_name1) + (z : very_very_long_type_name2), + f y x ∧ f y z ∧ f y x ∧ f y z ∧ f y x ∧ f y z +1 subgoal + + very_very_long_type_name1 : Type + very_very_long_type_name2 : Type + f : very_very_long_type_name1 → very_very_long_type_name2 → Prop + ============================ + True + → True + → ∃ (x : very_very_long_type_name1) (y : very_very_long_type_name2), + f x y ∧ f x y ∧ f x y ∧ f x y ∧ f x y ∧ f x y diff --git a/test-suite/output/Unicode.v b/test-suite/output/Unicode.v new file mode 100644 index 000000000..42b07e5a0 --- /dev/null +++ b/test-suite/output/Unicode.v @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +Require Import Coq.Unicode.Utf8. + +Section test. +Context (very_very_long_type_name1 : Type) (very_very_long_type_name2 : Type). +Context (f : very_very_long_type_name1 -> very_very_long_type_name2 -> Prop). + +Lemma test : True -> True -> + forall (x : very_very_long_type_name1) (y : very_very_long_type_name2), + f x y /\ f x y /\ f x y /\ f x y /\ f x y /\ f x y. +Proof. Show. Abort. + +Lemma test : True -> True -> + forall (x : very_very_long_type_name2) (y : very_very_long_type_name1) + (z : very_very_long_type_name2), + f y x /\ f y z. +Proof. Show. Abort. + +Lemma test : True -> True -> + forall (x : very_very_long_type_name2) (y : very_very_long_type_name1) + (z : very_very_long_type_name2), + f y x /\ f y z /\ f y x /\ f y z /\ f y x /\ f y z. +Proof. Show. Abort. + +Lemma test : True -> True -> + exists (x : very_very_long_type_name1) (y : very_very_long_type_name2), + f x y /\ f x y /\ f x y /\ f x y /\ f x y /\ f x y. +Proof. Show. Abort. +End test. diff --git a/test-suite/output/ltac.v b/test-suite/output/ltac.v index 6adbe95dd..901b1e3aa 100644 --- a/test-suite/output/ltac.v +++ b/test-suite/output/ltac.v @@ -37,17 +37,20 @@ Fail g1 I. Fail f1 I. Fail g2 I. Fail f2 I. +Abort. Ltac h x := injection x. Goal True -> False. Fail h I. intro H. Fail h H. +Abort. (* Check printing of the "var" argument "Hx" *) Ltac m H := idtac H; exact H. Goal True. let a:=constr:(let Hx := 0 in ltac:(m Hx)) in idtac. +Abort. (* Check consistency of interpretation scopes (#4398) *) diff --git a/test-suite/output/ssr_clear.out b/test-suite/output/ssr_clear.out new file mode 100644 index 000000000..151595406 --- /dev/null +++ b/test-suite/output/ssr_clear.out @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +The command has indeed failed with message: +Ltac call to "move (ssrmovearg) (ssrclauses)" failed. +No assumption is named NO_SUCH_NAME diff --git a/test-suite/output/ssr_clear.v b/test-suite/output/ssr_clear.v new file mode 100644 index 000000000..573ec47e0 --- /dev/null +++ b/test-suite/output/ssr_clear.v @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +Require Import ssreflect. + +Example foo : True -> True. +Proof. +Fail move=> {NO_SUCH_NAME}. +Abort. diff --git a/test-suite/output/ssr_explain_match.out b/test-suite/output/ssr_explain_match.out new file mode 100644 index 000000000..fa2393b91 --- /dev/null +++ b/test-suite/output/ssr_explain_match.out @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +File "stdin", line 12, characters 0-61: +Warning: Notation _ - _ was already used in scope nat_scope. +[notation-overridden,parsing] +File "stdin", line 12, characters 0-61: +Warning: Notation _ <= _ was already used in scope nat_scope. +[notation-overridden,parsing] +File "stdin", line 12, characters 0-61: +Warning: Notation _ < _ was already used in scope nat_scope. +[notation-overridden,parsing] +File "stdin", line 12, characters 0-61: +Warning: Notation _ >= _ was already used in scope nat_scope. +[notation-overridden,parsing] +File "stdin", line 12, characters 0-61: +Warning: Notation _ > _ was already used in scope nat_scope. +[notation-overridden,parsing] +File "stdin", line 12, characters 0-61: +Warning: Notation _ <= _ <= _ was already used in scope nat_scope. +[notation-overridden,parsing] +File "stdin", line 12, characters 0-61: +Warning: Notation _ < _ <= _ was already used in scope nat_scope. +[notation-overridden,parsing] +File "stdin", line 12, characters 0-61: +Warning: Notation _ <= _ < _ was already used in scope nat_scope. +[notation-overridden,parsing] +File "stdin", line 12, characters 0-61: +Warning: Notation _ < _ < _ was already used in scope nat_scope. +[notation-overridden,parsing] +File "stdin", line 12, characters 0-61: +Warning: Notation _ + _ was already used in scope nat_scope. +[notation-overridden,parsing] +File "stdin", line 12, characters 0-61: +Warning: Notation _ * _ was already used in scope nat_scope. +[notation-overridden,parsing] +BEGIN INSTANCES +instance: (x + y + z) matches: (x + y + z) +instance: (x + y) matches: (x + y) +instance: (x + y) matches: (x + y) +END INSTANCES +BEGIN INSTANCES +instance: (addnC (x + y) z) matches: (x + y + z) +instance: (addnC x y) matches: (x + y) +instance: (addnC x y) matches: (x + y) +END INSTANCES +BEGIN INSTANCES +instance: (addnA x y z) matches: (x + y + z) +END INSTANCES +BEGIN INSTANCES +instance: (addnA x y z) matches: (x + y + z) +instance: (addnC z (x + y)) matches: (x + y + z) +instance: (addnC y x) matches: (x + y) +instance: (addnC y x) matches: (x + y) +END INSTANCES +The command has indeed failed with message: +Ltac call to "ssrinstancesoftpat (cpattern)" failed. +Not supported diff --git a/test-suite/output/ssr_explain_match.v b/test-suite/output/ssr_explain_match.v new file mode 100644 index 000000000..56ca24b6e --- /dev/null +++ b/test-suite/output/ssr_explain_match.v @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +(************************************************************************) +(* * The Coq Proof Assistant / The Coq Development Team *) +(* v * INRIA, CNRS and contributors - Copyright 1999-2018 *) +(* <O___,, * (see CREDITS file for the list of authors) *) +(* \VV/ **************************************************************) +(* // * This file is distributed under the terms of the *) +(* * GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1 *) +(* * (see LICENSE file for the text of the license) *) +(************************************************************************) + +Require Import ssrmatching. +Require Import ssreflect ssrbool TestSuite.ssr_mini_mathcomp. + +Definition addnAC := (addnA, addnC). + +Lemma test x y z : x + y + z = x + y. + +ssrinstancesoftpat (_ + _). +ssrinstancesofruleL2R addnC. +ssrinstancesofruleR2L addnA. +ssrinstancesofruleR2L addnAC. +Fail ssrinstancesoftpat (_ + _ in RHS). (* Not implemented *) +Admitted. |