diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml')
| -rw-r--r-- | plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml | 36 |
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 18 deletions
diff --git a/plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml b/plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml index 023cbad43..ef894b239 100644 --- a/plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml +++ b/plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ let make_refl_eq constructor type_of_t t = type pte_info = { - proving_tac : (Id.t list -> Tacmach.tactic); + proving_tac : (Id.t list -> Proof_type.tactic); is_valid : constr -> bool } @@ -688,7 +688,7 @@ let instanciate_hyps_with_args (do_prove:Id.t list -> tactic) hyps args_id = let build_proof (interactive_proof:bool) - (fnames:constant list) + (fnames:Constant.t list) ptes_infos dyn_infos : tactic = @@ -708,13 +708,13 @@ let build_proof let term_eq = make_refl_eq (Lazy.force refl_equal) type_of_term t in - tclTHENSEQ + tclTHENLIST [ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize (term_eq::(List.map mkVar dyn_infos.rec_hyps))); thin dyn_infos.rec_hyps; Proofview.V82.of_tactic (pattern_option [Locus.AllOccurrencesBut [1],t] None); (fun g -> observe_tac "toto" ( - tclTHENSEQ [Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Simple.case t); + tclTHENLIST [Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Simple.case t); (fun g' -> let g'_nb_prod = nb_prod (project g') (pf_concl g') in let nb_instanciate_partial = g'_nb_prod - g_nb_prod in @@ -982,14 +982,14 @@ let generate_equation_lemma evd fnames f fun_num nb_params nb_args rec_args_num let eqn = mkApp(Lazy.force eq,[|type_of_f;eq_lhs;eq_rhs|]) in let lemma_type = it_mkProd_or_LetIn eqn type_ctxt in (* Pp.msgnl (str "lemma type " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr lemma_type ++ fnl () ++ str "f_body " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr f_body); *) - let f_id = Label.to_id (con_label (fst (destConst evd f))) in + let f_id = Label.to_id (Constant.label (fst (destConst evd f))) in let prove_replacement = - tclTHENSEQ + tclTHENLIST [ tclDO (nb_params + rec_args_num + 1) (Proofview.V82.of_tactic intro); observe_tac "" (fun g -> let rec_id = pf_nth_hyp_id g 1 in - tclTHENSEQ + tclTHENLIST [observe_tac "generalize_non_dep in generate_equation_lemma" (generalize_non_dep rec_id); observe_tac "h_case" (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (simplest_case (mkVar rec_id))); (Proofview.V82.of_tactic intros_reflexivity)] g @@ -1019,7 +1019,7 @@ let do_replace (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) params rec_arg_num rev_args_id f fun_num a let finfos = find_Function_infos (fst (destConst !evd f)) (*FIXME*) in mkConst (Option.get finfos.equation_lemma) with (Not_found | Option.IsNone as e) -> - let f_id = Label.to_id (con_label (fst (destConst !evd f))) in + let f_id = Label.to_id (Constant.label (fst (destConst !evd f))) in (*i The next call to mk_equation_id is valid since we will construct the lemma Ensures by: obvious i*) @@ -1242,7 +1242,7 @@ let prove_princ_for_struct (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) interactive_proof fun_num fnam other_fix_infos 0) in let first_tac : tactic = (* every operations until fix creations *) - tclTHENSEQ + tclTHENLIST [ observe_tac "introducing params" (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (intros_using (List.rev_map id_of_decl princ_info.params))); observe_tac "introducing predictes" (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (intros_using (List.rev_map id_of_decl princ_info.predicates))); observe_tac "introducing branches" (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (intros_using (List.rev_map id_of_decl princ_info.branches))); @@ -1260,7 +1260,7 @@ let prove_princ_for_struct (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) interactive_proof fun_num fnam in let fix_info = Id.Map.find pte ptes_to_fix in let nb_args = fix_info.nb_realargs in - tclTHENSEQ + tclTHENLIST [ (* observe_tac ("introducing args") *) (tclDO nb_args (Proofview.V82.of_tactic intro)); (fun g -> (* replacement of the function by its body *) @@ -1279,7 +1279,7 @@ let prove_princ_for_struct (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) interactive_proof fun_num fnam eq_hyps = [] } in - tclTHENSEQ + tclTHENLIST [ observe_tac "do_replace" (do_replace evd @@ -1322,7 +1322,7 @@ let prove_princ_for_struct (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) interactive_proof fun_num fnam ] gl with Not_found -> let nb_args = min (princ_info.nargs) (List.length ctxt) in - tclTHENSEQ + tclTHENLIST [ tclDO nb_args (Proofview.V82.of_tactic intro); (fun g -> (* replacement of the function by its body *) @@ -1343,7 +1343,7 @@ let prove_princ_for_struct (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) interactive_proof fun_num fnam } in let fname = destConst (project g) (fst (decompose_app (project g) (List.hd (List.rev pte_args)))) in - tclTHENSEQ + tclTHENLIST [Proofview.V82.of_tactic (unfold_in_concl [(Locus.AllOccurrences, Names.EvalConstRef (fst fname))]); let do_prove = build_proof @@ -1402,7 +1402,7 @@ let prove_with_tcc tcc_lemma_constr eqs : tactic = fun gls -> (* let hid = next_ident_away_in_goal h_id (pf_ids_of_hyps gls) in *) (* let ids = hid::pf_ids_of_hyps gls in *) - tclTHENSEQ + tclTHENLIST [ (* generalize [lemma]; *) (* h_intro hid; *) @@ -1457,13 +1457,13 @@ let rec rewrite_eqs_in_eqs eqs = let new_prove_with_tcc is_mes acc_inv hrec tcc_hyps eqs : tactic = fun gls -> - (tclTHENSEQ + (tclTHENLIST [ backtrack_eqs_until_hrec hrec eqs; (* observe_tac ("new_prove_with_tcc ( applying "^(Id.to_string hrec)^" )" ) *) (tclTHENS (* We must have exactly ONE subgoal !*) (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (apply (mkVar hrec))) - [ tclTHENSEQ + [ tclTHENLIST [ (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (keep (tcc_hyps@eqs))); (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (apply (Lazy.force acc_inv))); @@ -1617,7 +1617,7 @@ let prove_principle_for_gen (Id.of_string "prov") hyps in - tclTHENSEQ + tclTHENLIST [ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize [lemma]); Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Simple.intro hid); @@ -1636,7 +1636,7 @@ let prove_principle_for_gen ] gls in - tclTHENSEQ + tclTHENLIST [ observe_tac "start_tac" start_tac; h_intros |