aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffhomepage
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--contrib/interface/xlate.ml1
-rw-r--r--tactics/auto.ml2
-rw-r--r--tactics/hiddentac.ml6
-rw-r--r--tactics/hiddentac.mli2
-rw-r--r--tactics/tactics.ml116
-rw-r--r--tactics/tactics.mli8
-rw-r--r--theories/Classes/Init.v2
7 files changed, 78 insertions, 59 deletions
diff --git a/contrib/interface/xlate.ml b/contrib/interface/xlate.ml
index 4e910935a..7b654b74b 100644
--- a/contrib/interface/xlate.ml
+++ b/contrib/interface/xlate.ml
@@ -375,6 +375,7 @@ and (xlate_formula:Topconstr.constr_expr -> Ascent.ct_FORMULA) = function
(xlate_formula f, List.map xlate_formula_expl l'))
| CApp(_, (_,f), l) ->
CT_appc(xlate_formula f, xlate_formula_expl_ne_list l)
+ | CRecord (_,_,_) -> xlate_error "CRecord: TODO"
| CCases (_, _, _, [], _) -> assert false
| CCases (_, _, ret_type, tm::tml, eqns)->
CT_cases(CT_matched_formula_ne_list(xlate_matched_formula tm,
diff --git a/tactics/auto.ml b/tactics/auto.ml
index e9ec90ec3..42d74f9ed 100644
--- a/tactics/auto.ml
+++ b/tactics/auto.ml
@@ -724,7 +724,7 @@ let unify_resolve_nodelta (c,clenv) gls =
let unify_resolve flags (c,clenv) gls =
let clenv' = connect_clenv gls clenv in
let _ = clenv_unique_resolver false ~flags clenv' gls in
- h_apply true false [c,NoBindings] gls
+ h_apply true false [inj_open c,NoBindings] gls
(* builds a hint database from a constr signature *)
diff --git a/tactics/hiddentac.ml b/tactics/hiddentac.ml
index 1acc4880c..6498c3542 100644
--- a/tactics/hiddentac.ml
+++ b/tactics/hiddentac.ml
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ let h_exact_no_check c =
let h_vm_cast_no_check c =
abstract_tactic (TacVmCastNoCheck (inj_open c)) (vm_cast_no_check c)
let h_apply simple ev cb =
- abstract_tactic (TacApply (simple,ev,List.map inj_open_wb cb))
+ abstract_tactic (TacApply (simple,ev,cb))
(apply_with_ebindings_gen simple ev cb)
let h_elim ev cb cbo =
abstract_tactic (TacElim (ev,inj_open_wb cb,Option.map inj_open_wb cbo))
@@ -131,8 +131,8 @@ let h_symmetry c = abstract_tactic (TacSymmetry c) (intros_symmetry c)
let h_transitivity c =
abstract_tactic (TacTransitivity (inj_open c)) (intros_transitivity c)
-let h_simplest_apply c = h_apply false false [c,NoBindings]
-let h_simplest_eapply c = h_apply false true [c,NoBindings]
+let h_simplest_apply c = h_apply false false [inj_open c,NoBindings]
+let h_simplest_eapply c = h_apply false true [inj_open c,NoBindings]
let h_simplest_elim c = h_elim false (c,NoBindings) None
let h_simplest_case c = h_case false (c,NoBindings)
diff --git a/tactics/hiddentac.mli b/tactics/hiddentac.mli
index 8d15f864c..938befa49 100644
--- a/tactics/hiddentac.mli
+++ b/tactics/hiddentac.mli
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ val h_exact_no_check : constr -> tactic
val h_vm_cast_no_check : constr -> tactic
val h_apply : advanced_flag -> evars_flag ->
- constr with_ebindings list -> tactic
+ open_constr with_bindings list -> tactic
val h_elim : evars_flag -> constr with_ebindings ->
constr with_ebindings option -> tactic
diff --git a/tactics/tactics.ml b/tactics/tactics.ml
index 65082c2ee..be15311b9 100644
--- a/tactics/tactics.ml
+++ b/tactics/tactics.ml
@@ -719,52 +719,70 @@ let general_apply with_delta with_destruct with_evars (c,lbind) gl =
goal. If this fails, then the head constant will be unfolded step by
step. *)
let concl_nprod = nb_prod (pf_concl gl) in
+ let evm, c = c in
+ let origsigm = gl.sigma in
+ let check_evars sigm =
+ let rest =
+ Evd.fold (fun ev evi acc ->
+ if Evd.mem sigm ev && not (Evd.mem origsigm ev) && not (Evd.is_defined sigm ev) then
+ Evd.add acc ev evi
+ else acc) evm Evd.empty
+ in
+ if not (rest = Evd.empty) then
+ errorlabstrm "apply" (str"Uninstantiated existential variables: " ++ fnl () ++
+ pr_evar_map rest)
+ in
let rec try_main_apply c gl =
- let thm_ty0 = nf_betaiota (pf_type_of gl c) in
- let try_apply thm_ty nprod =
- let n = nb_prod thm_ty - nprod in
- if n<0 then error "Applied theorem has not enough premisses.";
- let clause = make_clenv_binding_apply gl (Some n) (c,thm_ty) lbind in
- Clenvtac.res_pf clause ~with_evars:with_evars ~flags:flags gl in
- try try_apply thm_ty0 concl_nprod
- with PretypeError _|RefinerError _|UserError _|Failure _ as exn ->
- let rec try_red_apply thm_ty =
- try
- (* Try to head-reduce the conclusion of the theorem *)
- let red_thm = try_red_product (pf_env gl) (project gl) thm_ty in
- try try_apply red_thm concl_nprod
- with PretypeError _|RefinerError _|UserError _|Failure _ ->
- try_red_apply red_thm
- with Redelimination ->
- (* Last chance: if the head is a variable, apply may try
- second order unification *)
- try if concl_nprod <> 0 then try_apply thm_ty 0 else raise Exit
- with PretypeError _|RefinerError _|UserError _|Failure _|Exit ->
- if with_destruct then
- try
- let (mind,t) = pf_reduce_to_quantified_ind gl (pf_type_of gl c) in
- match match_with_conjunction (snd (decompose_prod t)) with
- | Some _ ->
- let n = (mis_constr_nargs mind).(0) in
- let sort = elimination_sort_of_goal gl in
- let elim = pf_apply make_case_gen gl mind sort in
- tclTHENLAST
- (general_elim with_evars (c,NoBindings) (elim,NoBindings))
- (tclTHENLIST [
- tclDO n intro;
- tclLAST_NHYPS n (fun l ->
- tclFIRST
- (List.map (fun id ->
- tclTHEN (try_main_apply (mkVar id)) (thin l)) l))
- ]) gl
- | None ->
- raise Exit
- with RefinerError _|UserError _|Exit -> raise exn
- else
- raise exn
- in
- try_red_apply thm_ty0 in
- try_main_apply c gl
+ let thm_ty0 = nf_betaiota (pf_type_of gl c) in
+ let try_apply thm_ty nprod =
+ let n = nb_prod thm_ty - nprod in
+ if n<0 then error "Applied theorem has not enough premisses.";
+ let clause = make_clenv_binding_apply gl (Some n) (c,thm_ty) lbind in
+ let res = Clenvtac.res_pf clause ~with_evars:with_evars ~flags:flags gl in
+ if not with_evars then check_evars (fst res).sigma;
+ res
+ in
+ try try_apply thm_ty0 concl_nprod
+ with PretypeError _|RefinerError _|UserError _|Failure _ as exn ->
+ let rec try_red_apply thm_ty =
+ try
+ (* Try to head-reduce the conclusion of the theorem *)
+ let red_thm = try_red_product (pf_env gl) (project gl) thm_ty in
+ try try_apply red_thm concl_nprod
+ with PretypeError _|RefinerError _|UserError _|Failure _ ->
+ try_red_apply red_thm
+ with Redelimination ->
+ (* Last chance: if the head is a variable, apply may try
+ second order unification *)
+ try if concl_nprod <> 0 then try_apply thm_ty 0 else raise Exit
+ with PretypeError _|RefinerError _|UserError _|Failure _|Exit ->
+ if with_destruct then
+ try
+ let (mind,t) = pf_reduce_to_quantified_ind gl (pf_type_of gl c) in
+ match match_with_conjunction (snd (decompose_prod t)) with
+ | Some _ ->
+ let n = (mis_constr_nargs mind).(0) in
+ let sort = elimination_sort_of_goal gl in
+ let elim = pf_apply make_case_gen gl mind sort in
+ tclTHENLAST
+ (general_elim with_evars (c,NoBindings) (elim,NoBindings))
+ (tclTHENLIST [
+ tclDO n intro;
+ tclLAST_NHYPS n (fun l ->
+ tclFIRST
+ (List.map (fun id ->
+ tclTHEN (try_main_apply (mkVar id)) (thin l)) l))
+ ]) gl
+ | None ->
+ raise Exit
+ with RefinerError _|UserError _|Exit -> raise exn
+ else
+ raise exn
+ in try_red_apply thm_ty0
+ in
+ if evm = Evd.empty then try_main_apply c gl
+ else
+ tclTHEN (tclEVARS (Evd.merge gl.sigma evm)) (try_main_apply c) gl
let rec apply_with_ebindings_gen b e = function
| [] ->
@@ -778,13 +796,13 @@ let apply_with_ebindings cb = apply_with_ebindings_gen false false [cb]
let eapply_with_ebindings cb = apply_with_ebindings_gen false true [cb]
let apply_with_bindings (c,bl) =
- apply_with_ebindings (c,inj_ebindings bl)
+ apply_with_ebindings (inj_open c,inj_ebindings bl)
let eapply_with_bindings (c,bl) =
- apply_with_ebindings_gen false true [c,inj_ebindings bl]
+ apply_with_ebindings_gen false true [inj_open c,inj_ebindings bl]
let apply c =
- apply_with_ebindings (c,NoBindings)
+ apply_with_ebindings (inj_open c,NoBindings)
let apply_list = function
| c::l -> apply_with_bindings (c,ImplicitBindings l)
@@ -1009,7 +1027,7 @@ let constructor_tac with_evars expctdnumopt i lbind gl =
Array.length (snd (Global.lookup_inductive mind)).mind_consnames in
check_number_of_constructors expctdnumopt i nconstr;
let cons = mkConstruct (ith_constructor_of_inductive mind i) in
- let apply_tac = general_apply true false with_evars (cons,lbind) in
+ let apply_tac = general_apply true false with_evars (inj_open cons,lbind) in
(tclTHENLIST
[convert_concl_no_check redcl DEFAULTcast; intros; apply_tac]) gl
diff --git a/tactics/tactics.mli b/tactics/tactics.mli
index 99f2140dd..b2bd508ce 100644
--- a/tactics/tactics.mli
+++ b/tactics/tactics.mli
@@ -181,15 +181,15 @@ val bring_hyps : named_context -> tactic
val apply : constr -> tactic
val apply_without_reduce : constr -> tactic
val apply_list : constr list -> tactic
-
+
val apply_with_ebindings_gen :
- advanced_flag -> evars_flag -> constr with_ebindings list -> tactic
+ advanced_flag -> evars_flag -> open_constr with_ebindings list -> tactic
val apply_with_bindings : constr with_bindings -> tactic
val eapply_with_bindings : constr with_bindings -> tactic
-val apply_with_ebindings : constr with_ebindings -> tactic
-val eapply_with_ebindings : constr with_ebindings -> tactic
+val apply_with_ebindings : open_constr with_ebindings -> tactic
+val eapply_with_ebindings : open_constr with_ebindings -> tactic
val cut_and_apply : constr -> tactic
diff --git a/theories/Classes/Init.v b/theories/Classes/Init.v
index 0bd9f95dd..8b4cac5f4 100644
--- a/theories/Classes/Init.v
+++ b/theories/Classes/Init.v
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ Class Unconvertible (A : Type) (a b : A).
Ltac unconvertible :=
match goal with
| |- @Unconvertible _ ?x ?y => conv x y ; fail 1 "Convertible"
- | |- _ => apply Build_Unconvertible
+ | |- _ => eapply Build_Unconvertible
end.
Hint Extern 0 (@Unconvertible _ _ _) => unconvertible : typeclass_instances. \ No newline at end of file