diff options
-rw-r--r-- | doc/refman/RefMan-cic.tex | 10 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/doc/refman/RefMan-cic.tex b/doc/refman/RefMan-cic.tex index d2bae76f6..87d6f1d28 100644 --- a/doc/refman/RefMan-cic.tex +++ b/doc/refman/RefMan-cic.tex @@ -1591,16 +1591,6 @@ $ \CI{(\cons~\nat)}{P} \equiv\forall n:\nat, \forall l:\List~\nat, \CI{(\cons~\nat~n~l) : \List~\nat)}{P} \equiv\\ \equiv\forall n:\nat, \forall l:\List~\nat,(P~(\cons~\nat~n~l))$. -For $\haslengthA$, the type of $P$ will be -$\forall l:\ListA,\forall n:\nat, (\haslengthA~l~n)\ra \Prop$ and the expression -\CI{(\conshl~A)}{P} is defined as:\\ -$\forall a:A, \forall l:\ListA, \forall n:\nat, \forall -h:(\haslengthA~l~n), (P~(\cons~A~a~l)~(\nS~n)~(\conshl~A~a~l~n~l))$.\\ -If $P$ does not depend on its third argument, we find the more natural -expression:\\ -$\forall a:A, \forall l:\ListA, \forall n:\nat, -(\haslengthA~l~n)\ra(P~(\cons~A~a~l)~(\nS~n))$. - \paragraph{Typing rule.} Our very general destructor for inductive definition enjoys the |