diff options
author | 2013-08-08 18:51:35 +0000 | |
---|---|---|
committer | 2013-08-08 18:51:35 +0000 | |
commit | b2f2727670853183bfbcbafb9dc19f0f71494a7b (patch) | |
tree | 8d9cea5ed2713ab2bfe3b142816a48c5ba615758 /toplevel/command.ml | |
parent | 1f48326c7edf7f6e7062633494d25b254a6db82c (diff) |
State Transaction Machine
The process_transaction function adds a new edge to the Dag without
executing the transaction (when possible).
The observe id function runs the transactions necessary to reach to the
state id. Transaction being on a merged branch are not executed but
stored into a future.
The finish function calls observe on the tip of the current branch.
Imperative modifications to the environment made by some tactics are
now explicitly declared by the tactic and modeled as let-in/beta-redexes
at the root of the proof term. An example is the abstract tactic.
This is the work described in the Coq Workshop 2012 paper.
Coq is compile with thread support from now on.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@16674 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
Diffstat (limited to 'toplevel/command.ml')
-rw-r--r-- | toplevel/command.ml | 28 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/toplevel/command.ml b/toplevel/command.ml index 369abd3f8..d730d8ef1 100644 --- a/toplevel/command.ml +++ b/toplevel/command.ml @@ -67,9 +67,11 @@ let rec complete_conclusion a cs = function let red_constant_entry n ce = function | None -> ce | Some red -> - let body = ce.const_entry_body in - { ce with const_entry_body = - under_binders (Global.env()) (fst (reduction_of_red_expr red)) n body } + let proof_out = ce.const_entry_body in + { ce with const_entry_body = Future.chain ~id:"red_constant_entry" + proof_out (fun (body,eff) -> + under_binders (Global.env()) + (fst (reduction_of_red_expr red)) n body,eff) } let interp_definition bl red_option c ctypopt = let env = Global.env() in @@ -82,7 +84,7 @@ let interp_definition bl red_option c ctypopt = let c, imps2 = interp_constr_evars_impls ~impls evdref env_bl c in let body = nf_evar !evdref (it_mkLambda_or_LetIn c ctx) in imps1@(Impargs.lift_implicits nb_args imps2), - { const_entry_body = body; + { const_entry_body = Future.from_val (body,Declareops.no_seff); const_entry_secctx = None; const_entry_type = None; const_entry_opaque = false; @@ -100,7 +102,7 @@ let interp_definition bl red_option c ctypopt = then msg_warning (strbrk "Implicit arguments declaration relies on type." ++ spc () ++ strbrk "The term declares more implicits than the type here."); imps1@(Impargs.lift_implicits nb_args impsty), - { const_entry_body = body; + { const_entry_body = Future.from_val(body,Declareops.no_seff); const_entry_secctx = None; const_entry_type = Some typ; const_entry_opaque = false; @@ -135,7 +137,7 @@ let declare_definition_hook = ref ignore let set_declare_definition_hook = (:=) declare_definition_hook let get_declare_definition_hook () = !declare_definition_hook -let declare_definition ident (local, k) ce imps hook = +let declare_definition ident (local,k) ce imps hook = let () = !declare_definition_hook ce in let r = match local with | Discharge when Lib.sections_are_opened () -> @@ -158,7 +160,8 @@ let do_definition ident k bl red_option c ctypopt hook = let (ce, evd, imps as def) = interp_definition bl red_option c ctypopt in if Flags.is_program_mode () then let env = Global.env () in - let c = ce.const_entry_body in + let c,sideff = Future.force ce.const_entry_body in + assert(sideff = Declareops.no_seff); let typ = match ce.const_entry_type with | Some t -> t | None -> Retyping.get_type_of env evd c @@ -173,7 +176,7 @@ let do_definition ident k bl red_option c ctypopt hook = (* 2| Variable/Hypothesis/Parameter/Axiom declarations *) -let declare_assumption is_coe (local,kind) c imps impl nl (_,ident) = match local with +let declare_assumption is_coe (local, kind) c imps impl nl (_,ident) = match local with | Discharge when Lib.sections_are_opened () -> let decl = (Lib.cwd(), SectionLocalAssum (c,impl), IsAssumption kind) in let _ = declare_variable ident decl in @@ -521,7 +524,7 @@ let build_fix_type (_,ctx) ccl = it_mkProd_or_LetIn ccl ctx let declare_fix kind f def t imps = let ce = { - const_entry_body = def; + const_entry_body = Future.from_val def; const_entry_secctx = None; const_entry_type = Some t; const_entry_opaque = false; @@ -712,7 +715,7 @@ let build_wellfounded (recname,n,bl,arityc,body) r measure notation = let body = it_mkLambda_or_LetIn (mkApp (constr_of_global gr, [|make|])) binders_rel in let ty = it_mkProd_or_LetIn top_arity binders_rel in let ce = - { const_entry_body = Evarutil.nf_evar !evdref body; + { const_entry_body = Future.from_val (Evarutil.nf_evar !evdref body,Declareops.no_seff); const_entry_secctx = None; const_entry_type = Some ty; const_entry_opaque = false; @@ -824,10 +827,12 @@ let declare_fixpoint local ((fixnames,fixdefs,fixtypes),fiximps) indexes ntns = (* We shortcut the proof process *) let fixdefs = List.map Option.get fixdefs in let fixdecls = prepare_recursive_declaration fixnames fixtypes fixdefs in - let indexes = search_guard Loc.ghost (Global.env()) indexes fixdecls in + let env = Global.env() in + let indexes = search_guard Loc.ghost env indexes fixdecls in let fiximps = List.map (fun (n,r,p) -> r) fiximps in let fixdecls = List.map_i (fun i _ -> mkFix ((indexes,i),fixdecls)) 0 fixnames in + let fixdecls = List.map (fun c -> c, Declareops.no_seff) fixdecls in ignore (List.map4 (declare_fix (local, Fixpoint)) fixnames fixdecls fixtypes fiximps); (* Declare the recursive definitions *) fixpoint_message (Some indexes) fixnames; @@ -850,6 +855,7 @@ let declare_cofixpoint local ((fixnames,fixdefs,fixtypes),fiximps) ntns = let fixdefs = List.map Option.get fixdefs in let fixdecls = prepare_recursive_declaration fixnames fixtypes fixdefs in let fixdecls = List.map_i (fun i _ -> mkCoFix (i,fixdecls)) 0 fixnames in + let fixdecls = List.map (fun c-> c,Declareops.no_seff) fixdecls in let fiximps = List.map (fun (len,imps,idx) -> imps) fiximps in ignore (List.map4 (declare_fix (local, CoFixpoint)) fixnames fixdecls fixtypes fiximps); (* Declare the recursive definitions *) |