Fixing tauto "special" behavior on singleton types w/ 2 parameters (bug #2680).

- tauto/intuition now works uniformly on and, prod, or, sum, False,
  Empty_set, unit, True (and isomorphic copies of them), iff, ->, and
  on all inhabited singleton types with a no-arguments constructor
  such as "eq t t" (even though the last case goes out of
  propositional logic: this features is so often used that it is
  difficult to come back on it).
- New dtauto and dintuition works on all inductive types with one
  constructors and no real arguments (for instance, they work on
  records such as "Equivalence"), in addition to -> and eq-like types.
- Moreover, both of them no longer unfold inner negations (this is a
  souce of incompatibility for intuition and evaluation of the level
  of incompatibility on contribs still needs to be done).

Incidentally, and amazingly, fixing bug #2680 made that constants
InfA_compat and InfA_eqA in SetoidList.v lost one argument: old tauto
had indeed destructed a section hypothesis "@StrictOrder A ltA@
thinking it was a conjunction, making this section hypothesis
artificially necessary while it was not.

Renouncing to the unfolding of inner negations made auto/eauto
sometimes succeeding more, sometimes succeeding less. There is by the
way a (standard) problem with not in auto/eauto: even when given as an
"unfold hint", it works only in goals, not in hypotheses, so that auto
is not able to solve something like "forall P, (forall x, ~ P x) -> P
0 -> False". Should we automatically add a lemma of type "HYPS -> A ->
False" in the hint database everytime a lemma ""HYPS -> ~A" is
declared (and "unfold not" is a hint), and similarly for all unfold
hints?

At this occasion, also re-did some proofs of Znumtheory.

git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@15180 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7

2 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/theories/Structures/OrderedType.v b/theories/Structures/OrderedType.v
index f84cdf32c..beb10a833 100644
--- a/theories/Structures/OrderedType.v
+++ b/theories/Structures/OrderedType.v
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ Lemma Inf_lt : forall l x y, lt x y -> Inf y l -> Inf x l.
 Proof. exact (InfA_ltA lt_strorder). Qed.
 
 Lemma Inf_eq : forall l x y, eq x y -> Inf y l -> Inf x l.
-Proof. exact (InfA_eqA eq_equiv lt_strorder lt_compat). Qed.
+Proof. exact (InfA_eqA eq_equiv lt_compat). Qed.
 
 Lemma Sort_Inf_In : forall l x a, Sort l -> Inf a l -> In x l -> lt a x.
 Proof. exact (SortA_InfA_InA eq_equiv lt_strorder lt_compat). Qed.
@@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ Module KeyOrderedType(O:OrderedType).
   Qed.
 
   Lemma Inf_eq : forall l x x', eqk x x' -> Inf x' l -> Inf x l.
-  Proof. exact (InfA_eqA eqk_equiv ltk_strorder ltk_compat). Qed.
+  Proof. exact (InfA_eqA eqk_equiv ltk_compat). Qed.
 
   Lemma Inf_lt : forall l x x', ltk x x' -> Inf x' l -> Inf x l.
   Proof. exact (InfA_ltA ltk_strorder). Qed.
diff --git a/theories/Structures/OrdersLists.v b/theories/Structures/OrdersLists.v
index f83b63779..059992f5b 100644
--- a/theories/Structures/OrdersLists.v
+++ b/theories/Structures/OrdersLists.v
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ Lemma Inf_lt : forall l x y, lt x y -> Inf y l -> Inf x l.
 Proof. exact (InfA_ltA lt_strorder). Qed.
 
 Lemma Inf_eq : forall l x y, eq x y -> Inf y l -> Inf x l.
-Proof. exact (InfA_eqA eq_equiv lt_strorder lt_compat). Qed.
+Proof. exact (InfA_eqA eq_equiv lt_compat). Qed.
 
 Lemma Sort_Inf_In : forall l x a, Sort l -> Inf a l -> In x l -> lt a x.
 Proof. exact (SortA_InfA_InA eq_equiv lt_strorder lt_compat). Qed.