diff options
author | herbelin <herbelin@85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7> | 2003-11-29 17:28:49 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | herbelin <herbelin@85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7> | 2003-11-29 17:28:49 +0000 |
commit | 9a6e3fe764dc2543dfa94de20fe5eec42d6be705 (patch) | |
tree | 77c0021911e3696a8c98e35a51840800db4be2a9 /theories/Reals/Rtrigo_def.v | |
parent | 9058fb97426307536f56c3e7447be2f70798e081 (diff) |
Remplacement des fichiers .v ancienne syntaxe de theories, contrib et states par les fichiers nouvelle syntaxe
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@5027 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
Diffstat (limited to 'theories/Reals/Rtrigo_def.v')
-rw-r--r-- | theories/Reals/Rtrigo_def.v | 613 |
1 files changed, 334 insertions, 279 deletions
diff --git a/theories/Reals/Rtrigo_def.v b/theories/Reals/Rtrigo_def.v index 82c63a7b2..f18e9188e 100644 --- a/theories/Reals/Rtrigo_def.v +++ b/theories/Reals/Rtrigo_def.v @@ -8,350 +8,405 @@ (*i $Id$ i*) -Require Rbase. -Require Rfunctions. -Require SeqSeries. -Require Rtrigo_fun. -Require Max. -V7only [ Import nat_scope. Import Z_scope. Import R_scope. ]. +Require Import Rbase. +Require Import Rfunctions. +Require Import SeqSeries. +Require Import Rtrigo_fun. +Require Import Max. Open Local Scope R_scope. (*****************************) (* Definition of exponential *) (*****************************) -Definition exp_in:R->R->Prop := [x,l:R](infinit_sum [i:nat]``/(INR (fact i))*(pow x i)`` l). +Definition exp_in (x l:R) : Prop := + infinit_sum (fun i:nat => / INR (fact i) * x ^ i) l. -Lemma exp_cof_no_R0 : (n:nat) ``/(INR (fact n))<>0``. -Intro. -Apply Rinv_neq_R0. -Apply INR_fact_neq_0. +Lemma exp_cof_no_R0 : forall n:nat, / INR (fact n) <> 0. +intro. +apply Rinv_neq_0_compat. +apply INR_fact_neq_0. Qed. -Lemma exist_exp : (x:R)(SigT R [l:R](exp_in x l)). -Intro; Generalize (Alembert_C3 [n:nat](Rinv (INR (fact n))) x exp_cof_no_R0 Alembert_exp). -Unfold Pser exp_in. -Trivial. +Lemma exist_exp : forall x:R, sigT (fun l:R => exp_in x l). +intro; + generalize + (Alembert_C3 (fun n:nat => / INR (fact n)) x exp_cof_no_R0 Alembert_exp). +unfold Pser, exp_in in |- *. +trivial. Defined. -Definition exp : R -> R := [x:R](projT1 ? ? (exist_exp x)). +Definition exp (x:R) : R := projT1 (exist_exp x). -Lemma pow_i : (i:nat) (lt O i) -> (pow R0 i)==R0. -Intros; Apply pow_ne_zero. -Red; Intro; Rewrite H0 in H; Elim (lt_n_n ? H). +Lemma pow_i : forall i:nat, (0 < i)%nat -> 0 ^ i = 0. +intros; apply pow_ne_zero. +red in |- *; intro; rewrite H0 in H; elim (lt_irrefl _ H). Qed. (*i Calculus of $e^0$ *) -Lemma exist_exp0 : (SigT R [l:R](exp_in R0 l)). -Apply Specif.existT with R1. -Unfold exp_in; Unfold infinit_sum; Intros. -Exists O. -Intros; Replace (sum_f_R0 ([i:nat]``/(INR (fact i))*(pow R0 i)``) n) with R1. -Unfold R_dist; Replace ``1-1`` with R0; [Rewrite Rabsolu_R0; Assumption | Ring]. -Induction n. -Simpl; Rewrite Rinv_R1; Ring. -Rewrite tech5. -Rewrite <- Hrecn. -Simpl. -Ring. -Unfold ge; Apply le_O_n. +Lemma exist_exp0 : sigT (fun l:R => exp_in 0 l). +apply existT with 1. +unfold exp_in in |- *; unfold infinit_sum in |- *; intros. +exists 0%nat. +intros; replace (sum_f_R0 (fun i:nat => / INR (fact i) * 0 ^ i) n) with 1. +unfold R_dist in |- *; replace (1 - 1) with 0; + [ rewrite Rabs_R0; assumption | ring ]. +induction n as [| n Hrecn]. +simpl in |- *; rewrite Rinv_1; ring. +rewrite tech5. +rewrite <- Hrecn. +simpl in |- *. +ring. +unfold ge in |- *; apply le_O_n. Defined. -Lemma exp_0 : ``(exp 0)==1``. -Cut (exp_in R0 (exp R0)). -Cut (exp_in R0 R1). -Unfold exp_in; Intros; EApply unicity_sum. -Apply H0. -Apply H. -Exact (projT2 ? ? exist_exp0). -Exact (projT2 ? ? (exist_exp R0)). +Lemma exp_0 : exp 0 = 1. +cut (exp_in 0 (exp 0)). +cut (exp_in 0 1). +unfold exp_in in |- *; intros; eapply uniqueness_sum. +apply H0. +apply H. +exact (projT2 exist_exp0). +exact (projT2 (exist_exp 0)). Qed. (**************************************) (* Definition of hyperbolic functions *) (**************************************) -Definition cosh : R->R := [x:R]``((exp x)+(exp (-x)))/2``. -Definition sinh : R->R := [x:R]``((exp x)-(exp (-x)))/2``. -Definition tanh : R->R := [x:R]``(sinh x)/(cosh x)``. +Definition cosh (x:R) : R := (exp x + exp (- x)) / 2. +Definition sinh (x:R) : R := (exp x - exp (- x)) / 2. +Definition tanh (x:R) : R := sinh x / cosh x. -Lemma cosh_0 : ``(cosh 0)==1``. -Unfold cosh; Rewrite Ropp_O; Rewrite exp_0. -Unfold Rdiv; Rewrite <- Rinv_r_sym; [Reflexivity | DiscrR]. +Lemma cosh_0 : cosh 0 = 1. +unfold cosh in |- *; rewrite Ropp_0; rewrite exp_0. +unfold Rdiv in |- *; rewrite <- Rinv_r_sym; [ reflexivity | discrR ]. Qed. -Lemma sinh_0 : ``(sinh 0)==0``. -Unfold sinh; Rewrite Ropp_O; Rewrite exp_0. -Unfold Rminus Rdiv; Rewrite Rplus_Ropp_r; Apply Rmult_Ol. +Lemma sinh_0 : sinh 0 = 0. +unfold sinh in |- *; rewrite Ropp_0; rewrite exp_0. +unfold Rminus, Rdiv in |- *; rewrite Rplus_opp_r; apply Rmult_0_l. Qed. -Definition cos_n [n:nat] : R := ``(pow (-1) n)/(INR (fact (mult (S (S O)) n)))``. - -Lemma simpl_cos_n : (n:nat) (Rdiv (cos_n (S n)) (cos_n n))==(Ropp (Rinv (INR (mult (mult (2) (S n)) (plus (mult (2) n) (1)))))). -Intro; Unfold cos_n; Replace (S n) with (plus n (1)); [Idtac | Ring]. -Rewrite pow_add; Unfold Rdiv; Rewrite Rinv_Rmult. -Rewrite Rinv_Rinv. -Replace ``(pow ( -1) n)*(pow ( -1) (S O))*/(INR (fact (mult (S (S O)) (plus n (S O)))))*(/(pow ( -1) n)*(INR (fact (mult (S (S O)) n))))`` with ``((pow ( -1) n)*/(pow ( -1) n))*/(INR (fact (mult (S (S O)) (plus n (S O)))))*(INR (fact (mult (S (S O)) n)))*(pow (-1) (S O))``; [Idtac | Ring]. -Rewrite <- Rinv_r_sym. -Rewrite Rmult_1l; Unfold pow; Rewrite Rmult_1r. -Replace (mult (S (S O)) (plus n (S O))) with (S (S (mult (S (S O)) n))); [Idtac | Ring]. -Do 2 Rewrite fact_simpl; Do 2 Rewrite mult_INR; Repeat Rewrite Rinv_Rmult; Try (Apply not_O_INR; Discriminate). -Rewrite <- (Rmult_sym ``-1``). -Repeat Rewrite Rmult_assoc; Rewrite <- Rinv_l_sym. -Rewrite Rmult_1r. -Replace (S (mult (S (S O)) n)) with (plus (mult (S (S O)) n) (S O)); [Idtac | Ring]. -Rewrite mult_INR; Rewrite Rinv_Rmult. -Ring. -Apply not_O_INR; Discriminate. -Replace (plus (mult (S (S O)) n) (S O)) with (S (mult (S (S O)) n)); [Apply not_O_INR; Discriminate | Ring]. -Apply INR_fact_neq_0. -Apply INR_fact_neq_0. -Apply prod_neq_R0; [Apply not_O_INR; Discriminate | Apply INR_fact_neq_0]. -Apply pow_nonzero; DiscrR. -Apply INR_fact_neq_0. -Apply pow_nonzero; DiscrR. -Apply Rinv_neq_R0; Apply INR_fact_neq_0. +Definition cos_n (n:nat) : R := (-1) ^ n / INR (fact (2 * n)). + +Lemma simpl_cos_n : + forall n:nat, cos_n (S n) / cos_n n = - / INR (2 * S n * (2 * n + 1)). +intro; unfold cos_n in |- *; replace (S n) with (n + 1)%nat; [ idtac | ring ]. +rewrite pow_add; unfold Rdiv in |- *; rewrite Rinv_mult_distr. +rewrite Rinv_involutive. +replace + ((-1) ^ n * (-1) ^ 1 * / INR (fact (2 * (n + 1))) * + (/ (-1) ^ n * INR (fact (2 * n)))) with + ((-1) ^ n * / (-1) ^ n * / INR (fact (2 * (n + 1))) * INR (fact (2 * n)) * + (-1) ^ 1); [ idtac | ring ]. +rewrite <- Rinv_r_sym. +rewrite Rmult_1_l; unfold pow in |- *; rewrite Rmult_1_r. +replace (2 * (n + 1))%nat with (S (S (2 * n))); [ idtac | ring ]. +do 2 rewrite fact_simpl; do 2 rewrite mult_INR; + repeat rewrite Rinv_mult_distr; try (apply not_O_INR; discriminate). +rewrite <- (Rmult_comm (-1)). +repeat rewrite Rmult_assoc; rewrite <- Rinv_l_sym. +rewrite Rmult_1_r. +replace (S (2 * n)) with (2 * n + 1)%nat; [ idtac | ring ]. +rewrite mult_INR; rewrite Rinv_mult_distr. +ring. +apply not_O_INR; discriminate. +replace (2 * n + 1)%nat with (S (2 * n)); + [ apply not_O_INR; discriminate | ring ]. +apply INR_fact_neq_0. +apply INR_fact_neq_0. +apply prod_neq_R0; [ apply not_O_INR; discriminate | apply INR_fact_neq_0 ]. +apply pow_nonzero; discrR. +apply INR_fact_neq_0. +apply pow_nonzero; discrR. +apply Rinv_neq_0_compat; apply INR_fact_neq_0. Qed. -Lemma archimed_cor1 : (eps:R) ``0<eps`` -> (EX N : nat | ``/(INR N) < eps``/\(lt O N)). -Intros; Cut ``/eps < (IZR (up (/eps)))``. -Intro; Cut `0<=(up (Rinv eps))`. -Intro; Assert H2 := (IZN ? H1); Elim H2; Intros; Exists (max x (1)). -Split. -Cut ``0<(IZR (INZ x))``. -Intro; Rewrite INR_IZR_INZ; Apply Rle_lt_trans with ``/(IZR (INZ x))``. -Apply Rle_monotony_contra with (IZR (INZ x)). -Assumption. -Rewrite <- Rinv_r_sym; [Idtac | Red; Intro; Rewrite H5 in H4; Elim (Rlt_antirefl ? H4)]. -Apply Rle_monotony_contra with (IZR (INZ (max x (1)))). -Apply Rlt_le_trans with (IZR (INZ x)). -Assumption. -Repeat Rewrite <- INR_IZR_INZ; Apply le_INR; Apply le_max_l. -Rewrite Rmult_1r; Rewrite (Rmult_sym (IZR (INZ (max x (S O))))); Rewrite Rmult_assoc; Rewrite <- Rinv_l_sym. -Rewrite Rmult_1r; Repeat Rewrite <- INR_IZR_INZ; Apply le_INR; Apply le_max_l. -Rewrite <- INR_IZR_INZ; Apply not_O_INR. -Red; Intro;Assert H6 := (le_max_r x (1)); Cut (lt O (1)); [Intro | Apply lt_O_Sn]; Assert H8 := (lt_le_trans ? ? ? H7 H6); Rewrite H5 in H8; Elim (lt_n_n ? H8). -Pattern 1 eps; Rewrite <- Rinv_Rinv. -Apply Rinv_lt. -Apply Rmult_lt_pos; [Apply Rlt_Rinv; Assumption | Assumption]. -Rewrite H3 in H0; Assumption. -Red; Intro; Rewrite H5 in H; Elim (Rlt_antirefl ? H). -Apply Rlt_trans with ``/eps``. -Apply Rlt_Rinv; Assumption. -Rewrite H3 in H0; Assumption. -Apply lt_le_trans with (1); [Apply lt_O_Sn | Apply le_max_r]. -Apply le_IZR; Replace (IZR `0`) with R0; [Idtac | Reflexivity]; Left; Apply Rlt_trans with ``/eps``; [Apply Rlt_Rinv; Assumption | Assumption]. -Assert H0 := (archimed ``/eps``). -Elim H0; Intros; Assumption. +Lemma archimed_cor1 : + forall eps:R, 0 < eps -> exists N : nat | / INR N < eps /\ (0 < N)%nat. +intros; cut (/ eps < IZR (up (/ eps))). +intro; cut (0 <= up (/ eps))%Z. +intro; assert (H2 := IZN _ H1); elim H2; intros; exists (max x 1). +split. +cut (0 < IZR (Z_of_nat x)). +intro; rewrite INR_IZR_INZ; apply Rle_lt_trans with (/ IZR (Z_of_nat x)). +apply Rmult_le_reg_l with (IZR (Z_of_nat x)). +assumption. +rewrite <- Rinv_r_sym; + [ idtac | red in |- *; intro; rewrite H5 in H4; elim (Rlt_irrefl _ H4) ]. +apply Rmult_le_reg_l with (IZR (Z_of_nat (max x 1))). +apply Rlt_le_trans with (IZR (Z_of_nat x)). +assumption. +repeat rewrite <- INR_IZR_INZ; apply le_INR; apply le_max_l. +rewrite Rmult_1_r; rewrite (Rmult_comm (IZR (Z_of_nat (max x 1)))); + rewrite Rmult_assoc; rewrite <- Rinv_l_sym. +rewrite Rmult_1_r; repeat rewrite <- INR_IZR_INZ; apply le_INR; + apply le_max_l. +rewrite <- INR_IZR_INZ; apply not_O_INR. +red in |- *; intro; assert (H6 := le_max_r x 1); cut (0 < 1)%nat; + [ intro | apply lt_O_Sn ]; assert (H8 := lt_le_trans _ _ _ H7 H6); + rewrite H5 in H8; elim (lt_irrefl _ H8). +pattern eps at 1 in |- *; rewrite <- Rinv_involutive. +apply Rinv_lt_contravar. +apply Rmult_lt_0_compat; [ apply Rinv_0_lt_compat; assumption | assumption ]. +rewrite H3 in H0; assumption. +red in |- *; intro; rewrite H5 in H; elim (Rlt_irrefl _ H). +apply Rlt_trans with (/ eps). +apply Rinv_0_lt_compat; assumption. +rewrite H3 in H0; assumption. +apply lt_le_trans with 1%nat; [ apply lt_O_Sn | apply le_max_r ]. +apply le_IZR; replace (IZR 0) with 0; [ idtac | reflexivity ]; left; + apply Rlt_trans with (/ eps); + [ apply Rinv_0_lt_compat; assumption | assumption ]. +assert (H0 := archimed (/ eps)). +elim H0; intros; assumption. Qed. -Lemma Alembert_cos : (Un_cv [n:nat]``(Rabsolu (cos_n (S n))/(cos_n n))`` R0). -Unfold Un_cv; Intros. -Assert H0 := (archimed_cor1 eps H). -Elim H0; Intros; Exists x. -Intros; Rewrite simpl_cos_n; Unfold R_dist; Unfold Rminus; Rewrite Ropp_O; Rewrite Rplus_Or; Rewrite Rabsolu_Rabsolu; Rewrite Rabsolu_Ropp; Rewrite Rabsolu_right. -Rewrite mult_INR; Rewrite Rinv_Rmult. -Cut ``/(INR (mult (S (S O)) (S n)))<1``. -Intro; Cut ``/(INR (plus (mult (S (S O)) n) (S O)))<eps``. -Intro; Rewrite <- (Rmult_1l eps). -Apply Rmult_lt; Try Assumption. -Change ``0</(INR (plus (mult (S (S O)) n) (S O)))``; Apply Rlt_Rinv; Apply lt_INR_0. -Replace (plus (mult (2) n) (1)) with (S (mult (2) n)); [Apply lt_O_Sn | Ring]. -Apply Rlt_R0_R1. -Cut (lt x (plus (mult (2) n) (1))). -Intro; Assert H5 := (lt_INR ? ? H4). -Apply Rlt_trans with ``/(INR x)``. -Apply Rinv_lt. -Apply Rmult_lt_pos. -Apply lt_INR_0. -Elim H1; Intros; Assumption. -Apply lt_INR_0; Replace (plus (mult (2) n) (1)) with (S (mult (2) n)); [Apply lt_O_Sn | Ring]. -Assumption. -Elim H1; Intros; Assumption. -Apply lt_le_trans with (S n). -Unfold ge in H2; Apply le_lt_n_Sm; Assumption. -Replace (plus (mult (2) n) (1)) with (S (mult (2) n)); [Idtac | Ring]. -Apply le_n_S; Apply le_n_2n. -Apply Rlt_monotony_contra with (INR (mult (S (S O)) (S n))). -Apply lt_INR_0; Replace (mult (2) (S n)) with (S (S (mult (2) n))). -Apply lt_O_Sn. -Replace (S n) with (plus n (1)); [Idtac | Ring]. -Ring. -Rewrite <- Rinv_r_sym. -Rewrite Rmult_1r; Replace R1 with (INR (1)); [Apply lt_INR | Reflexivity]. -Replace (mult (2) (S n)) with (S (S (mult (2) n))). -Apply lt_n_S; Apply lt_O_Sn. -Replace (S n) with (plus n (1)); [Ring | Ring]. -Apply not_O_INR; Discriminate. -Apply not_O_INR; Discriminate. -Replace (plus (mult (S (S O)) n) (S O)) with (S (mult (2) n)); [Apply not_O_INR; Discriminate | Ring]. -Apply Rle_sym1; Left; Apply Rlt_Rinv. -Apply lt_INR_0. -Replace (mult (mult (2) (S n)) (plus (mult (2) n) (1))) with (S (S (plus (mult (4) (mult n n)) (mult (6) n)))). -Apply lt_O_Sn. -Apply INR_eq. -Repeat Rewrite S_INR; Rewrite plus_INR; Repeat Rewrite mult_INR; Rewrite plus_INR; Rewrite mult_INR; Repeat Rewrite S_INR; Replace (INR O) with R0; [Ring | Reflexivity]. +Lemma Alembert_cos : Un_cv (fun n:nat => Rabs (cos_n (S n) / cos_n n)) 0. +unfold Un_cv in |- *; intros. +assert (H0 := archimed_cor1 eps H). +elim H0; intros; exists x. +intros; rewrite simpl_cos_n; unfold R_dist in |- *; unfold Rminus in |- *; + rewrite Ropp_0; rewrite Rplus_0_r; rewrite Rabs_Rabsolu; + rewrite Rabs_Ropp; rewrite Rabs_right. +rewrite mult_INR; rewrite Rinv_mult_distr. +cut (/ INR (2 * S n) < 1). +intro; cut (/ INR (2 * n + 1) < eps). +intro; rewrite <- (Rmult_1_l eps). +apply Rmult_gt_0_lt_compat; try assumption. +change (0 < / INR (2 * n + 1)) in |- *; apply Rinv_0_lt_compat; + apply lt_INR_0. +replace (2 * n + 1)%nat with (S (2 * n)); [ apply lt_O_Sn | ring ]. +apply Rlt_0_1. +cut (x < 2 * n + 1)%nat. +intro; assert (H5 := lt_INR _ _ H4). +apply Rlt_trans with (/ INR x). +apply Rinv_lt_contravar. +apply Rmult_lt_0_compat. +apply lt_INR_0. +elim H1; intros; assumption. +apply lt_INR_0; replace (2 * n + 1)%nat with (S (2 * n)); + [ apply lt_O_Sn | ring ]. +assumption. +elim H1; intros; assumption. +apply lt_le_trans with (S n). +unfold ge in H2; apply le_lt_n_Sm; assumption. +replace (2 * n + 1)%nat with (S (2 * n)); [ idtac | ring ]. +apply le_n_S; apply le_n_2n. +apply Rmult_lt_reg_l with (INR (2 * S n)). +apply lt_INR_0; replace (2 * S n)%nat with (S (S (2 * n))). +apply lt_O_Sn. +replace (S n) with (n + 1)%nat; [ idtac | ring ]. +ring. +rewrite <- Rinv_r_sym. +rewrite Rmult_1_r; replace 1 with (INR 1); [ apply lt_INR | reflexivity ]. +replace (2 * S n)%nat with (S (S (2 * n))). +apply lt_n_S; apply lt_O_Sn. +replace (S n) with (n + 1)%nat; [ ring | ring ]. +apply not_O_INR; discriminate. +apply not_O_INR; discriminate. +replace (2 * n + 1)%nat with (S (2 * n)); + [ apply not_O_INR; discriminate | ring ]. +apply Rle_ge; left; apply Rinv_0_lt_compat. +apply lt_INR_0. +replace (2 * S n * (2 * n + 1))%nat with (S (S (4 * (n * n) + 6 * n))). +apply lt_O_Sn. +apply INR_eq. +repeat rewrite S_INR; rewrite plus_INR; repeat rewrite mult_INR; + rewrite plus_INR; rewrite mult_INR; repeat rewrite S_INR; + replace (INR 0) with 0; [ ring | reflexivity ]. Qed. -Lemma cosn_no_R0 : (n:nat)``(cos_n n)<>0``. -Intro; Unfold cos_n; Unfold Rdiv; Apply prod_neq_R0. -Apply pow_nonzero; DiscrR. -Apply Rinv_neq_R0. -Apply INR_fact_neq_0. +Lemma cosn_no_R0 : forall n:nat, cos_n n <> 0. +intro; unfold cos_n in |- *; unfold Rdiv in |- *; apply prod_neq_R0. +apply pow_nonzero; discrR. +apply Rinv_neq_0_compat. +apply INR_fact_neq_0. Qed. (**********) -Definition cos_in:R->R->Prop := [x,l:R](infinit_sum [i:nat]``(cos_n i)*(pow x i)`` l). +Definition cos_in (x l:R) : Prop := + infinit_sum (fun i:nat => cos_n i * x ^ i) l. (**********) -Lemma exist_cos : (x:R)(SigT R [l:R](cos_in x l)). -Intro; Generalize (Alembert_C3 cos_n x cosn_no_R0 Alembert_cos). -Unfold Pser cos_in; Trivial. +Lemma exist_cos : forall x:R, sigT (fun l:R => cos_in x l). +intro; generalize (Alembert_C3 cos_n x cosn_no_R0 Alembert_cos). +unfold Pser, cos_in in |- *; trivial. Qed. (* Definition of cosinus *) (*************************) -Definition cos : R -> R := [x:R](Cases (exist_cos (Rsqr x)) of (Specif.existT a b) => a end). - - -Definition sin_n [n:nat] : R := ``(pow (-1) n)/(INR (fact (plus (mult (S (S O)) n) (S O))))``. - -Lemma simpl_sin_n : (n:nat) (Rdiv (sin_n (S n)) (sin_n n))==(Ropp (Rinv (INR (mult (plus (mult (2) (S n)) (1)) (mult (2) (S n)))))). -Intro; Unfold sin_n; Replace (S n) with (plus n (1)); [Idtac | Ring]. -Rewrite pow_add; Unfold Rdiv; Rewrite Rinv_Rmult. -Rewrite Rinv_Rinv. -Replace ``(pow ( -1) n)*(pow ( -1) (S O))*/(INR (fact (plus (mult (S (S O)) (plus n (S O))) (S O))))*(/(pow ( -1) n)*(INR (fact (plus (mult (S (S O)) n) (S O)))))`` with ``((pow ( -1) n)*/(pow ( -1) n))*/(INR (fact (plus (mult (S (S O)) (plus n (S O))) (S O))))*(INR (fact (plus (mult (S (S O)) n) (S O))))*(pow (-1) (S O))``; [Idtac | Ring]. -Rewrite <- Rinv_r_sym. -Rewrite Rmult_1l; Unfold pow; Rewrite Rmult_1r; Replace (plus (mult (S (S O)) (plus n (S O))) (S O)) with (S (S (plus (mult (S (S O)) n) (S O)))). -Do 2 Rewrite fact_simpl; Do 2 Rewrite mult_INR; Repeat Rewrite Rinv_Rmult. -Rewrite <- (Rmult_sym ``-1``); Repeat Rewrite Rmult_assoc; Rewrite <- Rinv_l_sym. -Rewrite Rmult_1r; Replace (S (plus (mult (S (S O)) n) (S O))) with (mult (S (S O)) (plus n (S O))). -Repeat Rewrite mult_INR; Repeat Rewrite Rinv_Rmult. -Ring. -Apply not_O_INR; Discriminate. -Replace (plus n (S O)) with (S n); [Apply not_O_INR; Discriminate | Ring]. -Apply not_O_INR; Discriminate. -Apply prod_neq_R0. -Apply not_O_INR; Discriminate. -Replace (plus n (S O)) with (S n); [Apply not_O_INR; Discriminate | Ring]. -Apply not_O_INR; Discriminate. -Replace (plus n (S O)) with (S n); [Apply not_O_INR; Discriminate | Ring]. -Rewrite mult_plus_distr_r; Cut (n:nat) (S n)=(plus n (1)). -Intros; Rewrite (H (plus (mult (2) n) (1))). -Ring. -Intros; Ring. -Apply INR_fact_neq_0. -Apply not_O_INR; Discriminate. -Apply INR_fact_neq_0. -Apply not_O_INR; Discriminate. -Apply prod_neq_R0; [Apply not_O_INR; Discriminate | Apply INR_fact_neq_0]. -Cut (n:nat) (S (S n))=(plus n (2)); [Intros; Rewrite (H (plus (mult (2) n) (1))); Ring | Intros; Ring]. -Apply pow_nonzero; DiscrR. -Apply INR_fact_neq_0. -Apply pow_nonzero; DiscrR. -Apply Rinv_neq_R0; Apply INR_fact_neq_0. +Definition cos (x:R) : R := + match exist_cos (Rsqr x) with + | existT a b => a + end. + + +Definition sin_n (n:nat) : R := (-1) ^ n / INR (fact (2 * n + 1)). + +Lemma simpl_sin_n : + forall n:nat, sin_n (S n) / sin_n n = - / INR ((2 * S n + 1) * (2 * S n)). +intro; unfold sin_n in |- *; replace (S n) with (n + 1)%nat; [ idtac | ring ]. +rewrite pow_add; unfold Rdiv in |- *; rewrite Rinv_mult_distr. +rewrite Rinv_involutive. +replace + ((-1) ^ n * (-1) ^ 1 * / INR (fact (2 * (n + 1) + 1)) * + (/ (-1) ^ n * INR (fact (2 * n + 1)))) with + ((-1) ^ n * / (-1) ^ n * / INR (fact (2 * (n + 1) + 1)) * + INR (fact (2 * n + 1)) * (-1) ^ 1); [ idtac | ring ]. +rewrite <- Rinv_r_sym. +rewrite Rmult_1_l; unfold pow in |- *; rewrite Rmult_1_r; + replace (2 * (n + 1) + 1)%nat with (S (S (2 * n + 1))). +do 2 rewrite fact_simpl; do 2 rewrite mult_INR; + repeat rewrite Rinv_mult_distr. +rewrite <- (Rmult_comm (-1)); repeat rewrite Rmult_assoc; + rewrite <- Rinv_l_sym. +rewrite Rmult_1_r; replace (S (2 * n + 1)) with (2 * (n + 1))%nat. +repeat rewrite mult_INR; repeat rewrite Rinv_mult_distr. +ring. +apply not_O_INR; discriminate. +replace (n + 1)%nat with (S n); [ apply not_O_INR; discriminate | ring ]. +apply not_O_INR; discriminate. +apply prod_neq_R0. +apply not_O_INR; discriminate. +replace (n + 1)%nat with (S n); [ apply not_O_INR; discriminate | ring ]. +apply not_O_INR; discriminate. +replace (n + 1)%nat with (S n); [ apply not_O_INR; discriminate | ring ]. +rewrite mult_plus_distr_l; cut (forall n:nat, S n = (n + 1)%nat). +intros; rewrite (H (2 * n + 1)%nat). +ring. +intros; ring. +apply INR_fact_neq_0. +apply not_O_INR; discriminate. +apply INR_fact_neq_0. +apply not_O_INR; discriminate. +apply prod_neq_R0; [ apply not_O_INR; discriminate | apply INR_fact_neq_0 ]. +cut (forall n:nat, S (S n) = (n + 2)%nat); + [ intros; rewrite (H (2 * n + 1)%nat); ring | intros; ring ]. +apply pow_nonzero; discrR. +apply INR_fact_neq_0. +apply pow_nonzero; discrR. +apply Rinv_neq_0_compat; apply INR_fact_neq_0. Qed. -Lemma Alembert_sin : (Un_cv [n:nat]``(Rabsolu (sin_n (S n))/(sin_n n))`` R0). -Unfold Un_cv; Intros; Assert H0 := (archimed_cor1 eps H). -Elim H0; Intros; Exists x. -Intros; Rewrite simpl_sin_n; Unfold R_dist; Unfold Rminus; Rewrite Ropp_O; Rewrite Rplus_Or; Rewrite Rabsolu_Rabsolu; Rewrite Rabsolu_Ropp; Rewrite Rabsolu_right. -Rewrite mult_INR; Rewrite Rinv_Rmult. -Cut ``/(INR (mult (S (S O)) (S n)))<1``. -Intro; Cut ``/(INR (plus (mult (S (S O)) (S n)) (S O)))<eps``. -Intro; Rewrite <- (Rmult_1l eps); Rewrite (Rmult_sym ``/(INR (plus (mult (S (S O)) (S n)) (S O)))``); Apply Rmult_lt; Try Assumption. -Change ``0</(INR (plus (mult (S (S O)) (S n)) (S O)))``; Apply Rlt_Rinv; Apply lt_INR_0; Replace (plus (mult (2) (S n)) (1)) with (S (mult (2) (S n))); [Apply lt_O_Sn | Ring]. -Apply Rlt_R0_R1. -Cut (lt x (plus (mult (2) (S n)) (1))). -Intro; Assert H5 := (lt_INR ? ? H4); Apply Rlt_trans with ``/(INR x)``. -Apply Rinv_lt. -Apply Rmult_lt_pos. -Apply lt_INR_0; Elim H1; Intros; Assumption. -Apply lt_INR_0; Replace (plus (mult (2) (S n)) (1)) with (S (mult (2) (S n))); [Apply lt_O_Sn | Ring]. -Assumption. -Elim H1; Intros; Assumption. -Apply lt_le_trans with (S n). -Unfold ge in H2; Apply le_lt_n_Sm; Assumption. -Replace (plus (mult (2) (S n)) (1)) with (S (mult (2) (S n))); [Idtac | Ring]. -Apply le_S; Apply le_n_2n. -Apply Rlt_monotony_contra with (INR (mult (S (S O)) (S n))). -Apply lt_INR_0; Replace (mult (2) (S n)) with (S (S (mult (2) n))); [Apply lt_O_Sn | Replace (S n) with (plus n (1)); [Idtac | Ring]; Ring]. -Rewrite <- Rinv_r_sym. -Rewrite Rmult_1r; Replace R1 with (INR (1)); [Apply lt_INR | Reflexivity]. -Replace (mult (2) (S n)) with (S (S (mult (2) n))). -Apply lt_n_S; Apply lt_O_Sn. -Replace (S n) with (plus n (1)); [Ring | Ring]. -Apply not_O_INR; Discriminate. -Apply not_O_INR; Discriminate. -Apply not_O_INR; Discriminate. -Left; Change ``0</(INR (mult (plus (mult (S (S O)) (S n)) (S O)) (mult (S (S O)) (S n))))``; Apply Rlt_Rinv. -Apply lt_INR_0. -Replace (mult (plus (mult (2) (S n)) (1)) (mult (2) (S n))) with (S (S (S (S (S (S (plus (mult (4) (mult n n)) (mult (10) n)))))))). -Apply lt_O_Sn. -Apply INR_eq; Repeat Rewrite S_INR; Rewrite plus_INR; Repeat Rewrite mult_INR; Rewrite plus_INR; Rewrite mult_INR; Repeat Rewrite S_INR; Replace (INR O) with R0; [Ring | Reflexivity]. +Lemma Alembert_sin : Un_cv (fun n:nat => Rabs (sin_n (S n) / sin_n n)) 0. +unfold Un_cv in |- *; intros; assert (H0 := archimed_cor1 eps H). +elim H0; intros; exists x. +intros; rewrite simpl_sin_n; unfold R_dist in |- *; unfold Rminus in |- *; + rewrite Ropp_0; rewrite Rplus_0_r; rewrite Rabs_Rabsolu; + rewrite Rabs_Ropp; rewrite Rabs_right. +rewrite mult_INR; rewrite Rinv_mult_distr. +cut (/ INR (2 * S n) < 1). +intro; cut (/ INR (2 * S n + 1) < eps). +intro; rewrite <- (Rmult_1_l eps); rewrite (Rmult_comm (/ INR (2 * S n + 1))); + apply Rmult_gt_0_lt_compat; try assumption. +change (0 < / INR (2 * S n + 1)) in |- *; apply Rinv_0_lt_compat; + apply lt_INR_0; replace (2 * S n + 1)%nat with (S (2 * S n)); + [ apply lt_O_Sn | ring ]. +apply Rlt_0_1. +cut (x < 2 * S n + 1)%nat. +intro; assert (H5 := lt_INR _ _ H4); apply Rlt_trans with (/ INR x). +apply Rinv_lt_contravar. +apply Rmult_lt_0_compat. +apply lt_INR_0; elim H1; intros; assumption. +apply lt_INR_0; replace (2 * S n + 1)%nat with (S (2 * S n)); + [ apply lt_O_Sn | ring ]. +assumption. +elim H1; intros; assumption. +apply lt_le_trans with (S n). +unfold ge in H2; apply le_lt_n_Sm; assumption. +replace (2 * S n + 1)%nat with (S (2 * S n)); [ idtac | ring ]. +apply le_S; apply le_n_2n. +apply Rmult_lt_reg_l with (INR (2 * S n)). +apply lt_INR_0; replace (2 * S n)%nat with (S (S (2 * n))); + [ apply lt_O_Sn | replace (S n) with (n + 1)%nat; [ idtac | ring ]; ring ]. +rewrite <- Rinv_r_sym. +rewrite Rmult_1_r; replace 1 with (INR 1); [ apply lt_INR | reflexivity ]. +replace (2 * S n)%nat with (S (S (2 * n))). +apply lt_n_S; apply lt_O_Sn. +replace (S n) with (n + 1)%nat; [ ring | ring ]. +apply not_O_INR; discriminate. +apply not_O_INR; discriminate. +apply not_O_INR; discriminate. +left; change (0 < / INR ((2 * S n + 1) * (2 * S n))) in |- *; + apply Rinv_0_lt_compat. +apply lt_INR_0. +replace ((2 * S n + 1) * (2 * S n))%nat with + (S (S (S (S (S (S (4 * (n * n) + 10 * n))))))). +apply lt_O_Sn. +apply INR_eq; repeat rewrite S_INR; rewrite plus_INR; repeat rewrite mult_INR; + rewrite plus_INR; rewrite mult_INR; repeat rewrite S_INR; + replace (INR 0) with 0; [ ring | reflexivity ]. Qed. -Lemma sin_no_R0 : (n:nat)``(sin_n n)<>0``. -Intro; Unfold sin_n; Unfold Rdiv; Apply prod_neq_R0. -Apply pow_nonzero; DiscrR. -Apply Rinv_neq_R0; Apply INR_fact_neq_0. +Lemma sin_no_R0 : forall n:nat, sin_n n <> 0. +intro; unfold sin_n in |- *; unfold Rdiv in |- *; apply prod_neq_R0. +apply pow_nonzero; discrR. +apply Rinv_neq_0_compat; apply INR_fact_neq_0. Qed. (**********) -Definition sin_in:R->R->Prop := [x,l:R](infinit_sum [i:nat]``(sin_n i)*(pow x i)`` l). +Definition sin_in (x l:R) : Prop := + infinit_sum (fun i:nat => sin_n i * x ^ i) l. (**********) -Lemma exist_sin : (x:R)(SigT R [l:R](sin_in x l)). -Intro; Generalize (Alembert_C3 sin_n x sin_no_R0 Alembert_sin). -Unfold Pser sin_n; Trivial. +Lemma exist_sin : forall x:R, sigT (fun l:R => sin_in x l). +intro; generalize (Alembert_C3 sin_n x sin_no_R0 Alembert_sin). +unfold Pser, sin_n in |- *; trivial. Qed. (***********************) (* Definition of sinus *) -Definition sin : R -> R := [x:R](Cases (exist_sin (Rsqr x)) of (Specif.existT a b) => ``x*a`` end). +Definition sin (x:R) : R := + match exist_sin (Rsqr x) with + | existT a b => x * a + end. (*********************************************) (* PROPERTIES *) (*********************************************) -Lemma cos_sym : (x:R) ``(cos x)==(cos (-x))``. -Intros; Unfold cos; Replace ``(Rsqr (-x))`` with (Rsqr x). -Reflexivity. -Apply Rsqr_neg. +Lemma cos_sym : forall x:R, cos x = cos (- x). +intros; unfold cos in |- *; replace (Rsqr (- x)) with (Rsqr x). +reflexivity. +apply Rsqr_neg. Qed. -Lemma sin_antisym : (x:R)``(sin (-x))==-(sin x)``. -Intro; Unfold sin; Replace ``(Rsqr (-x))`` with (Rsqr x); [Idtac | Apply Rsqr_neg]. -Case (exist_sin (Rsqr x)); Intros; Ring. +Lemma sin_antisym : forall x:R, sin (- x) = - sin x. +intro; unfold sin in |- *; replace (Rsqr (- x)) with (Rsqr x); + [ idtac | apply Rsqr_neg ]. +case (exist_sin (Rsqr x)); intros; ring. Qed. -Lemma sin_0 : ``(sin 0)==0``. -Unfold sin; Case (exist_sin (Rsqr R0)). -Intros; Ring. +Lemma sin_0 : sin 0 = 0. +unfold sin in |- *; case (exist_sin (Rsqr 0)). +intros; ring. Qed. -Lemma exist_cos0 : (SigT R [l:R](cos_in R0 l)). -Apply Specif.existT with R1. -Unfold cos_in; Unfold infinit_sum; Intros; Exists O. -Intros. -Unfold R_dist. -Induction n. -Unfold cos_n; Simpl. -Unfold Rdiv; Rewrite Rinv_R1. -Do 2 Rewrite Rmult_1r. -Unfold Rminus; Rewrite Rplus_Ropp_r; Rewrite Rabsolu_R0; Assumption. -Rewrite tech5. -Replace ``(cos_n (S n))*(pow 0 (S n))`` with R0. -Rewrite Rplus_Or. -Apply Hrecn; Unfold ge; Apply le_O_n. -Simpl; Ring. +Lemma exist_cos0 : sigT (fun l:R => cos_in 0 l). +apply existT with 1. +unfold cos_in in |- *; unfold infinit_sum in |- *; intros; exists 0%nat. +intros. +unfold R_dist in |- *. +induction n as [| n Hrecn]. +unfold cos_n in |- *; simpl in |- *. +unfold Rdiv in |- *; rewrite Rinv_1. +do 2 rewrite Rmult_1_r. +unfold Rminus in |- *; rewrite Rplus_opp_r; rewrite Rabs_R0; assumption. +rewrite tech5. +replace (cos_n (S n) * 0 ^ S n) with 0. +rewrite Rplus_0_r. +apply Hrecn; unfold ge in |- *; apply le_O_n. +simpl in |- *; ring. Defined. (* Calculus of (cos 0) *) -Lemma cos_0 : ``(cos 0)==1``. -Cut (cos_in R0 (cos R0)). -Cut (cos_in R0 R1). -Unfold cos_in; Intros; EApply unicity_sum. -Apply H0. -Apply H. -Exact (projT2 ? ? exist_cos0). -Assert H := (projT2 ? ? (exist_cos (Rsqr R0))); Unfold cos; Pattern 1 R0; Replace R0 with (Rsqr R0); [Exact H | Apply Rsqr_O]. -Qed. +Lemma cos_0 : cos 0 = 1. +cut (cos_in 0 (cos 0)). +cut (cos_in 0 1). +unfold cos_in in |- *; intros; eapply uniqueness_sum. +apply H0. +apply H. +exact (projT2 exist_cos0). +assert (H := projT2 (exist_cos (Rsqr 0))); unfold cos in |- *; + pattern 0 at 1 in |- *; replace 0 with (Rsqr 0); [ exact H | apply Rsqr_0 ]. +Qed.
\ No newline at end of file |