diff options
| author |  Guillaume Melquiond <guillaume.melquiond@inria.fr> | 2017-04-02 10:30:59 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Guillaume Melquiond <guillaume.melquiond@inria.fr> | 2017-04-02 10:33:44 +0200 |
| commit | 58bc387700d1fe4856571e8fae5c1761f89adc38 (patch) | |
| tree | e0cf041a35ccbf5315d900e3bf05024bb38c8c96 /theories/Reals/R_Ifp.v | |
| parent | 05421cef04206a18cb30f6d115d27e7cb25ba0bf (diff) | |
Simplify some proofs.
This commit does not modify the signature of the involved modules, only
the opaque proof terms.
One has to wonder how proofs can bitrot so much that several occurrences
of "replace 4 with 4" start appearing.
Diffstat (limited to 'theories/Reals/R_Ifp.v')
| -rw-r--r-- | theories/Reals/R_Ifp.v | 35 |
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 21 deletions
diff --git a/theories/Reals/R_Ifp.v b/theories/Reals/R_Ifp.v index e9b1762af..46583d374 100644 --- a/theories/Reals/R_Ifp.v +++ b/theories/Reals/R_Ifp.v @@ -42,28 +42,23 @@ Qed. Lemma up_tech : forall (r:R) (z:Z), IZR z <= r -> r < IZR (z + 1) -> (z + 1)%Z = up r. Proof. - intros; generalize (Rplus_le_compat_l 1 (IZR z) r H); intro; clear H; - rewrite (Rplus_comm 1 (IZR z)) in H1; rewrite (Rplus_comm 1 r) in H1; - cut (1 = IZR 1); auto with zarith real. - intro; generalize H1; pattern 1 at 1; rewrite H; intro; clear H H1; - rewrite <- (plus_IZR z 1) in H2; apply (tech_up r (z + 1)); - auto with zarith real. + intros. + apply tech_up with (1 := H0). + rewrite plus_IZR. + now apply Rplus_le_compat_r. Qed. (**********) Lemma fp_R0 : frac_part 0 = 0. Proof. - unfold frac_part; unfold Int_part; elim (archimed 0); intros; - unfold Rminus; elim (Rplus_ne (- IZR (up 0 - 1))); - intros a b; rewrite b; clear a b; rewrite <- Z_R_minus; - cut (up 0 = 1%Z). - intro; rewrite H1; - rewrite (Rminus_diag_eq (IZR 1) (IZR 1) (eq_refl (IZR 1))); - apply Ropp_0. - elim (archimed 0); intros; clear H2; unfold Rgt in H1; - rewrite (Rminus_0_r (IZR (up 0))) in H0; generalize (lt_O_IZR (up 0) H1); - intro; clear H1; generalize (le_IZR_R1 (up 0) H0); - intro; clear H H0; omega. + unfold frac_part, Int_part. + replace (up 0) with 1%Z. + now rewrite <- minus_IZR. + destruct (archimed 0) as [H1 H2]. + apply lt_IZR in H1. + rewrite <- minus_IZR in H2. + apply le_IZR in H2. + omega. Qed. (**********) @@ -229,8 +224,7 @@ Proof. rewrite (Rplus_opp_r (IZR (Int_part r1) - IZR (Int_part r2))) in H; elim (Rplus_ne (r1 - r2)); intros a b; rewrite b in H; clear a b; rewrite (Z_R_minus (Int_part r1) (Int_part r2)) in H0; - rewrite (Z_R_minus (Int_part r1) (Int_part r2)) in H; - cut (1 = IZR 1); auto with zarith real. + rewrite (Z_R_minus (Int_part r1) (Int_part r2)) in H. rewrite <- (plus_IZR (Int_part r1 - Int_part r2) 1) in H; generalize (up_tech (r1 - r2) (Int_part r1 - Int_part r2) H0 H); intros; clear H H0; unfold Int_part at 1; @@ -497,8 +491,7 @@ Proof. in H0; rewrite (Rplus_opp_r (IZR (Int_part r1) + IZR (Int_part r2))) in H0; elim (Rplus_ne (IZR (Int_part r1) + IZR (Int_part r2))); intros a b; rewrite a in H0; clear a b; elim (Rplus_ne (r1 + r2)); - intros a b; rewrite b in H0; clear a b; cut (1 = IZR 1); - auto with zarith real. + intros a b; rewrite b in H0; clear a b. rewrite <- (plus_IZR (Int_part r1) (Int_part r2)) in H0; rewrite <- (plus_IZR (Int_part r1) (Int_part r2)) in H1; rewrite <- (plus_IZR (Int_part r1 + Int_part r2) 1) in H1; |