aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffhomepage
path: root/theories/Numbers/Natural/Binary
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGravatar letouzey <letouzey@85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7>2009-11-10 11:19:25 +0000
committerGravatar letouzey <letouzey@85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7>2009-11-10 11:19:25 +0000
commite8b2255678a7fa1c140c4a50dca26cc94ac1a6e0 (patch)
treee1dcc1538e1ce09783a7d4fccc94c6aeb75b29e0 /theories/Numbers/Natural/Binary
parent424b20ed34966506cef31abf85e3e3911138f0fc (diff)
Simplification of Numbers, mainly thanks to Include
- No more nesting of Module and Module Type, we rather use Include. - Instead of in-name-qualification like NZeq, we use uniform short names + modular qualification like N.eq when necessary. - Many simplification of proofs, by some autorewrite for instance - In NZOrder, we instantiate an "order" tactic. - Some requirements in NZAxioms were superfluous: compatibility of le, min and max could be derived from the rest. - NMul removed, since it was containing only an ad-hoc result for ZNatPairs, that we've inlined in the proof of mul_wd there. - Zdomain removed (was already not compiled), idea of a module with eq and eqb reused in DecidableType.BooleanEqualityType. - ZBinDefs don't contain any definition now, migrate it to ZBinary. git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@12489 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
Diffstat (limited to 'theories/Numbers/Natural/Binary')
-rw-r--r--theories/Numbers/Natural/Binary/NBinDefs.v226
-rw-r--r--theories/Numbers/Natural/Binary/NBinary.v170
2 files changed, 168 insertions, 228 deletions
diff --git a/theories/Numbers/Natural/Binary/NBinDefs.v b/theories/Numbers/Natural/Binary/NBinDefs.v
deleted file mode 100644
index d2fe94dad..000000000
--- a/theories/Numbers/Natural/Binary/NBinDefs.v
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,226 +0,0 @@
-(************************************************************************)
-(* v * The Coq Proof Assistant / The Coq Development Team *)
-(* <O___,, * CNRS-Ecole Polytechnique-INRIA Futurs-Universite Paris Sud *)
-(* \VV/ **************************************************************)
-(* // * This file is distributed under the terms of the *)
-(* * GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1 *)
-(************************************************************************)
-(* Evgeny Makarov, INRIA, 2007 *)
-(************************************************************************)
-
-(*i $Id$ i*)
-
-Require Import BinPos.
-Require Export BinNat.
-Require Import NSub.
-
-Open Local Scope N_scope.
-
-(** Implementation of [NAxiomsSig] module type via [BinNat.N] *)
-
-Module NBinaryAxiomsMod <: NAxiomsSig.
-Module Export NZOrdAxiomsMod <: NZOrdAxiomsSig.
-Module Export NZAxiomsMod <: NZAxiomsSig.
-
-Definition NZ := N.
-Definition NZeq := @eq N.
-Definition NZ0 := N0.
-Definition NZsucc := Nsucc.
-Definition NZpred := Npred.
-Definition NZadd := Nplus.
-Definition NZsub := Nminus.
-Definition NZmul := Nmult.
-
-Instance NZeq_equiv : Equivalence NZeq.
-Program Instance NZsucc_wd : Proper (eq==>eq) NZsucc.
-Program Instance NZpred_wd : Proper (eq==>eq) NZpred.
-Program Instance NZadd_wd : Proper (eq==>eq==>eq) NZadd.
-Program Instance NZsub_wd : Proper (eq==>eq==>eq) NZsub.
-Program Instance NZmul_wd : Proper (eq==>eq==>eq) NZmul.
-
-Theorem NZinduction :
- forall A : NZ -> Prop, Proper (NZeq==>iff) A ->
- A N0 -> (forall n, A n <-> A (NZsucc n)) -> forall n : NZ, A n.
-Proof.
-intros A A_wd A0 AS. apply Nrect. assumption. intros; now apply -> AS.
-Qed.
-
-Theorem NZpred_succ : forall n : NZ, NZpred (NZsucc n) = n.
-Proof.
-destruct n as [| p]; simpl. reflexivity.
-case_eq (Psucc p); try (intros q H; rewrite <- H; now rewrite Ppred_succ).
-intro H; false_hyp H Psucc_not_one.
-Qed.
-
-Theorem NZadd_0_l : forall n : NZ, N0 + n = n.
-Proof.
-reflexivity.
-Qed.
-
-Theorem NZadd_succ_l : forall n m : NZ, (NZsucc n) + m = NZsucc (n + m).
-Proof.
-destruct n; destruct m.
-simpl in |- *; reflexivity.
-unfold NZsucc, NZadd, Nsucc, Nplus. rewrite <- Pplus_one_succ_l; reflexivity.
-simpl in |- *; reflexivity.
-simpl in |- *; rewrite Pplus_succ_permute_l; reflexivity.
-Qed.
-
-Theorem NZsub_0_r : forall n : NZ, n - N0 = n.
-Proof.
-now destruct n.
-Qed.
-
-Theorem NZsub_succ_r : forall n m : NZ, n - (NZsucc m) = NZpred (n - m).
-Proof.
-destruct n as [| p]; destruct m as [| q]; try reflexivity.
-now destruct p.
-simpl. rewrite Pminus_mask_succ_r, Pminus_mask_carry_spec.
-now destruct (Pminus_mask p q) as [| r |]; [| destruct r |].
-Qed.
-
-Theorem NZmul_0_l : forall n : NZ, N0 * n = N0.
-Proof.
-destruct n; reflexivity.
-Qed.
-
-Theorem NZmul_succ_l : forall n m : NZ, (NZsucc n) * m = n * m + m.
-Proof.
-destruct n as [| n]; destruct m as [| m]; simpl; try reflexivity.
-now rewrite Pmult_Sn_m, Pplus_comm.
-Qed.
-
-End NZAxiomsMod.
-
-Definition NZlt := Nlt.
-Definition NZle := Nle.
-Definition NZmin := Nmin.
-Definition NZmax := Nmax.
-
-Program Instance NZlt_wd : Proper (eq==>eq==>iff) NZlt.
-Program Instance NZle_wd : Proper (eq==>eq==>iff) NZle.
-Program Instance NZmin_wd : Proper (eq==>eq==>eq) NZmin.
-Program Instance NZmax_wd : Proper (eq==>eq==>eq) NZmax.
-
-Theorem NZlt_eq_cases : forall n m : N, n <= m <-> n < m \/ n = m.
-Proof.
-intros n m. unfold Nle, Nlt. rewrite <- Ncompare_eq_correct.
-destruct (n ?= m); split; intro H1; (try discriminate); try (now left); try now right.
-now elim H1. destruct H1; discriminate.
-Qed.
-
-Theorem NZlt_irrefl : forall n : NZ, ~ n < n.
-Proof.
-intro n; unfold Nlt; now rewrite Ncompare_refl.
-Qed.
-
-Theorem NZlt_succ_r : forall n m : NZ, n < (NZsucc m) <-> n <= m.
-Proof.
-intros n m; unfold Nlt, Nle; destruct n as [| p]; destruct m as [| q]; simpl;
-split; intro H; try reflexivity; try discriminate.
-destruct p; simpl; intros; discriminate. exfalso; now apply H.
-apply -> Pcompare_p_Sq in H. destruct H as [H | H].
-now rewrite H. now rewrite H, Pcompare_refl.
-apply <- Pcompare_p_Sq. case_eq ((p ?= q)%positive Eq); intro H1.
-right; now apply Pcompare_Eq_eq. now left. exfalso; now apply H.
-Qed.
-
-Theorem NZmin_l : forall n m : N, n <= m -> NZmin n m = n.
-Proof.
-unfold NZmin, Nmin, Nle; intros n m H.
-destruct (n ?= m); try reflexivity. now elim H.
-Qed.
-
-Theorem NZmin_r : forall n m : N, m <= n -> NZmin n m = m.
-Proof.
-unfold NZmin, Nmin, Nle; intros n m H.
-case_eq (n ?= m); intro H1; try reflexivity.
-now apply -> Ncompare_eq_correct.
-rewrite <- Ncompare_antisym, H1 in H; elim H; auto.
-Qed.
-
-Theorem NZmax_l : forall n m : N, m <= n -> NZmax n m = n.
-Proof.
-unfold NZmax, Nmax, Nle; intros n m H.
-case_eq (n ?= m); intro H1; try reflexivity.
-symmetry; now apply -> Ncompare_eq_correct.
-rewrite <- Ncompare_antisym, H1 in H; elim H; auto.
-Qed.
-
-Theorem NZmax_r : forall n m : N, n <= m -> NZmax n m = m.
-Proof.
-unfold NZmax, Nmax, Nle; intros n m H.
-destruct (n ?= m); try reflexivity. now elim H.
-Qed.
-
-End NZOrdAxiomsMod.
-
-Definition recursion (A : Type) (a : A) (f : N -> A -> A) (n : N) :=
- Nrect (fun _ => A) a f n.
-Implicit Arguments recursion [A].
-
-Theorem pred_0 : Npred N0 = N0.
-Proof.
-reflexivity.
-Qed.
-
-Instance recursion_wd A (Aeq : relation A) :
- Proper (Aeq==>(eq==>Aeq==>Aeq)==>eq==>Aeq) (@recursion A).
-Proof.
-intros A Aeq a a' Eaa' f f' Eff'.
-intro x; pattern x; apply Nrect.
-intros x' H; now rewrite <- H.
-clear x.
-intros x IH x' H; rewrite <- H.
-unfold recursion in *. do 2 rewrite Nrect_step.
-now apply Eff'; [| apply IH].
-Qed.
-
-Theorem recursion_0 :
- forall (A : Type) (a : A) (f : N -> A -> A), recursion a f N0 = a.
-Proof.
-intros A a f; unfold recursion; now rewrite Nrect_base.
-Qed.
-
-Theorem recursion_succ :
- forall (A : Type) (Aeq : relation A) (a : A) (f : N -> A -> A),
- Aeq a a -> Proper (eq==>Aeq==>Aeq) f ->
- forall n : N, Aeq (recursion a f (Nsucc n)) (f n (recursion a f n)).
-Proof.
-unfold recursion; intros A Aeq a f EAaa f_wd n; pattern n; apply Nrect.
-rewrite Nrect_step; rewrite Nrect_base; now apply f_wd.
-clear n; intro n; do 2 rewrite Nrect_step; intro IH. apply f_wd; [reflexivity|].
-now rewrite Nrect_step.
-Qed.
-
-End NBinaryAxiomsMod.
-
-Module Export NBinarySubPropMod := NSubPropFunct NBinaryAxiomsMod.
-
-(*
-Require Import NDefOps.
-Module Import NBinaryDefOpsMod := NdefOpsPropFunct NBinaryAxiomsMod.
-
-(* Some fun comparing the efficiency of the generic log defined
-by strong (course-of-value) recursion and the log defined by recursion
-on notation *)
-
-Time Eval vm_compute in (log 500000). (* 11 sec *)
-
-Fixpoint binposlog (p : positive) : N :=
-match p with
-| xH => 0
-| xO p' => Nsucc (binposlog p')
-| xI p' => Nsucc (binposlog p')
-end.
-
-Definition binlog (n : N) : N :=
-match n with
-| 0 => 0
-| Npos p => binposlog p
-end.
-
-Time Eval vm_compute in (binlog 500000). (* 0 sec *)
-Time Eval vm_compute in (binlog 1000000000000000000000000000000). (* 0 sec *)
-
-*) \ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/theories/Numbers/Natural/Binary/NBinary.v b/theories/Numbers/Natural/Binary/NBinary.v
index 558f2d0e4..e94644c48 100644
--- a/theories/Numbers/Natural/Binary/NBinary.v
+++ b/theories/Numbers/Natural/Binary/NBinary.v
@@ -10,6 +10,172 @@
(*i $Id$ i*)
-Require Export NBinDefs.
-Require Export NArithRing.
+Require Import BinPos.
+Require Export BinNat.
+Require Import NAxioms NProperties.
+Local Open Scope N_scope.
+
+(** * Implementation of [NAxiomsSig] module type via [BinNat.N] *)
+
+Module NBinaryAxiomsMod <: NAxiomsSig.
+
+(** Bi-directional induction. *)
+
+Theorem bi_induction :
+ forall A : N -> Prop, Proper (eq==>iff) A ->
+ A N0 -> (forall n, A n <-> A (Nsucc n)) -> forall n : N, A n.
+Proof.
+intros A A_wd A0 AS. apply Nrect. assumption. intros; now apply -> AS.
+Qed.
+
+(** Basic operations. *)
+
+Instance eq_equiv : Equivalence (@eq N).
+Program Instance succ_wd : Proper (eq==>eq) Nsucc.
+Program Instance pred_wd : Proper (eq==>eq) Npred.
+Program Instance add_wd : Proper (eq==>eq==>eq) Nplus.
+Program Instance sub_wd : Proper (eq==>eq==>eq) Nminus.
+Program Instance mul_wd : Proper (eq==>eq==>eq) Nmult.
+
+Definition pred_succ := Npred_succ.
+Definition add_0_l := Nplus_0_l.
+Definition add_succ_l := Nplus_succ.
+Definition sub_0_r := Nminus_0_r.
+Definition sub_succ_r := Nminus_succ_r.
+Definition mul_0_l := Nmult_0_l.
+Definition mul_succ_l n m := eq_trans (Nmult_Sn_m n m) (Nplus_comm _ _).
+
+(** Order *)
+
+Program Instance lt_wd : Proper (eq==>eq==>iff) Nlt.
+
+Definition lt_eq_cases := Nle_lteq.
+Definition lt_irrefl := Nlt_irrefl.
+
+Theorem lt_succ_r : forall n m, n < (Nsucc m) <-> n <= m.
+Proof.
+intros n m; unfold Nlt, Nle; destruct n as [| p]; destruct m as [| q]; simpl;
+split; intro H; try reflexivity; try discriminate.
+destruct p; simpl; intros; discriminate. exfalso; now apply H.
+apply -> Pcompare_p_Sq in H. destruct H as [H | H].
+now rewrite H. now rewrite H, Pcompare_refl.
+apply <- Pcompare_p_Sq. case_eq ((p ?= q)%positive Eq); intro H1.
+right; now apply Pcompare_Eq_eq. now left. exfalso; now apply H.
+Qed.
+
+Theorem min_l : forall n m, n <= m -> Nmin n m = n.
+Proof.
+unfold Nmin, Nle; intros n m H.
+destruct (n ?= m); try reflexivity. now elim H.
+Qed.
+
+Theorem min_r : forall n m, m <= n -> Nmin n m = m.
+Proof.
+unfold Nmin, Nle; intros n m H.
+case_eq (n ?= m); intro H1; try reflexivity.
+now apply -> Ncompare_eq_correct.
+rewrite <- Ncompare_antisym, H1 in H; elim H; auto.
+Qed.
+
+Theorem max_l : forall n m, m <= n -> Nmax n m = n.
+Proof.
+unfold Nmax, Nle; intros n m H.
+case_eq (n ?= m); intro H1; try reflexivity.
+symmetry; now apply -> Ncompare_eq_correct.
+rewrite <- Ncompare_antisym, H1 in H; elim H; auto.
+Qed.
+
+Theorem max_r : forall n m : N, n <= m -> Nmax n m = m.
+Proof.
+unfold Nmax, Nle; intros n m H.
+destruct (n ?= m); try reflexivity. now elim H.
+Qed.
+
+(** Part specific to natural numbers, not integers. *)
+
+Theorem pred_0 : Npred 0 = 0.
+Proof.
+reflexivity.
+Qed.
+
+Definition recursion (A : Type) : A -> (N -> A -> A) -> N -> A :=
+ Nrect (fun _ => A).
+Implicit Arguments recursion [A].
+
+Instance recursion_wd A (Aeq : relation A) :
+ Proper (Aeq==>(eq==>Aeq==>Aeq)==>eq==>Aeq) (@recursion A).
+Proof.
+intros A Aeq a a' Eaa' f f' Eff'.
+intro x; pattern x; apply Nrect.
+intros x' H; now rewrite <- H.
+clear x.
+intros x IH x' H; rewrite <- H.
+unfold recursion in *. do 2 rewrite Nrect_step.
+now apply Eff'; [| apply IH].
+Qed.
+
+Theorem recursion_0 :
+ forall (A : Type) (a : A) (f : N -> A -> A), recursion a f N0 = a.
+Proof.
+intros A a f; unfold recursion; now rewrite Nrect_base.
+Qed.
+
+Theorem recursion_succ :
+ forall (A : Type) (Aeq : relation A) (a : A) (f : N -> A -> A),
+ Aeq a a -> Proper (eq==>Aeq==>Aeq) f ->
+ forall n : N, Aeq (recursion a f (Nsucc n)) (f n (recursion a f n)).
+Proof.
+unfold recursion; intros A Aeq a f EAaa f_wd n; pattern n; apply Nrect.
+rewrite Nrect_step; rewrite Nrect_base; now apply f_wd.
+clear n; intro n; do 2 rewrite Nrect_step; intro IH. apply f_wd; [reflexivity|].
+now rewrite Nrect_step.
+Qed.
+
+(** The instantiation of operations.
+ Placing them at the very end avoids having indirections in above lemmas. *)
+
+Definition t := N.
+Definition eq := @eq N.
+Definition zero := N0.
+Definition succ := Nsucc.
+Definition pred := Npred.
+Definition add := Nplus.
+Definition sub := Nminus.
+Definition mul := Nmult.
+Definition lt := Nlt.
+Definition le := Nle.
+Definition min := Nmin.
+Definition max := Nmax.
+
+End NBinaryAxiomsMod.
+
+Module Export NBinaryPropMod := NPropFunct NBinaryAxiomsMod.
+
+(*
+Require Import NDefOps.
+Module Import NBinaryDefOpsMod := NdefOpsPropFunct NBinaryAxiomsMod.
+
+(* Some fun comparing the efficiency of the generic log defined
+by strong (course-of-value) recursion and the log defined by recursion
+on notation *)
+
+Time Eval vm_compute in (log 500000). (* 11 sec *)
+
+Fixpoint binposlog (p : positive) : N :=
+match p with
+| xH => 0
+| xO p' => Nsucc (binposlog p')
+| xI p' => Nsucc (binposlog p')
+end.
+
+Definition binlog (n : N) : N :=
+match n with
+| 0 => 0
+| Npos p => binposlog p
+end.
+
+Time Eval vm_compute in (binlog 500000). (* 0 sec *)
+Time Eval vm_compute in (binlog 1000000000000000000000000000000). (* 0 sec *)
+
+*) \ No newline at end of file