diff options
author | Jason Gross <jgross@mit.edu> | 2017-02-23 11:15:24 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jason Gross <jgross@mit.edu> | 2017-05-28 09:38:36 -0400 |
commit | 90ddbd7f0b10c0635dc3c5b948b4c0f049d45350 (patch) | |
tree | 1d009fcf10532ad6b6f56c405bd881d019a200a1 /theories/Init | |
parent | dcc77d0dd478b2758d41e35975d31b12e86f61ca (diff) |
Use notations for [sig], [sigT], [sig2], [sigT2]
Diffstat (limited to 'theories/Init')
-rw-r--r-- | theories/Init/Specif.v | 126 |
1 files changed, 63 insertions, 63 deletions
diff --git a/theories/Init/Specif.v b/theories/Init/Specif.v index f3570b0d6..5da6feee2 100644 --- a/theories/Init/Specif.v +++ b/theories/Init/Specif.v @@ -225,20 +225,20 @@ Import EqNotations. Section sigT. Local Unset Implicit Arguments. (** Projecting an equality of a pair to equality of the first components *) - Definition projT1_eq {A} {P : A -> Type} {u v : sigT P} (p : u = v) + Definition projT1_eq {A} {P : A -> Type} {u v : { a : A & P a }} (p : u = v) : projT1 u = projT1 v := f_equal (@projT1 _ _) p. (** Projecting an equality of a pair to equality of the second components *) - Definition projT2_eq {A} {P : A -> Type} {u v : sigT P} (p : u = v) + Definition projT2_eq {A} {P : A -> Type} {u v : { a : A & P a }} (p : u = v) : rew projT1_eq p in projT2 u = projT2 v. Proof. destruct p; reflexivity. Defined. (** Equality of [sigT] is itself a [sigT] *) - Definition eq_sigT_uncurried {A : Type} {P : A -> Type} (u v : sigT P) - (pq : sigT (fun p : projT1 u = projT1 v => rew p in projT2 u = projT2 v)) + Definition eq_sigT_uncurried {A : Type} {P : A -> Type} (u v : { a : A & P a }) + (pq : { p : projT1 u = projT1 v & rew p in projT2 u = projT2 v }) : u = v. Proof. destruct u as [u1 u2], v as [v1 v2]; simpl in *. @@ -248,14 +248,14 @@ Section sigT. Defined. (** Curried version of proving equality of sigma types *) - Definition eq_sigT {A : Type} {P : A -> Type} (u v : sigT P) + Definition eq_sigT {A : Type} {P : A -> Type} (u v : { a : A & P a }) (p : projT1 u = projT1 v) (q : rew p in projT2 u = projT2 v) : u = v := eq_sigT_uncurried u v (existT _ p q). (** Equality of [sigT] when the property is an hProp *) Definition eq_sigT_hprop {A P} (P_hprop : forall (x : A) (p q : P x), p = q) - (u v : @sigT A P) + (u v : { a : A & P a }) (p : projT1 u = projT1 v) : u = v := eq_sigT u v p (P_hprop _ _ _). @@ -265,35 +265,35 @@ Section sigT. don't. If we wanted to deal with proofs of equality of Σ types in dependent positions, we'd need it. *) Definition eq_sigT_uncurried_iff {A P} - (u v : @sigT A P) + (u v : { a : A & P a }) : u = v <-> (sigT (fun p : projT1 u = projT1 v => rew p in projT2 u = projT2 v)). Proof. split; [ intro; subst; exists eq_refl; reflexivity | apply eq_sigT_uncurried ]. Defined. (** Induction principle for [@eq (sigT _)] *) - Definition eq_sigT_rect {A P} {u v : @sigT A P} (Q : u = v -> Type) + Definition eq_sigT_rect {A P} {u v : { a : A & P a }} (Q : u = v -> Type) (f : forall p q, Q (eq_sigT u v p q)) : forall p, Q p. Proof. intro p; specialize (f (projT1_eq p) (projT2_eq p)); destruct u, p; exact f. Defined. - Definition eq_sigT_rec {A P u v} (Q : u = v :> @sigT A P -> Set) := eq_sigT_rect Q. - Definition eq_sigT_ind {A P u v} (Q : u = v :> @sigT A P -> Prop) := eq_sigT_rec Q. + Definition eq_sigT_rec {A P u v} (Q : u = v :> { a : A & P a } -> Set) := eq_sigT_rect Q. + Definition eq_sigT_ind {A P u v} (Q : u = v :> { a : A & P a } -> Prop) := eq_sigT_rec Q. (** Equivalence of equality of [sigT] involving hProps with equality of the first components *) Definition eq_sigT_hprop_iff {A P} (P_hprop : forall (x : A) (p q : P x), p = q) - (u v : @sigT A P) + (u v : { a : A & P a }) : u = v <-> (projT1 u = projT1 v) := conj (fun p => f_equal (@projT1 _ _) p) (eq_sigT_hprop P_hprop u v). (** Non-dependent classification of equality of [sigT] *) - Definition eq_sigT_nondep {A B : Type} (u v : @sigT A (fun _ => B)) + Definition eq_sigT_nondep {A B : Type} (u v : { a : A & B }) (p : projT1 u = projT1 v) (q : projT2 u = projT2 v) : u = v := @eq_sigT _ _ u v p (eq_trans (rew_const _ _) q). (** Classification of transporting across an equality of [sigT]s *) - Lemma rew_sigT {A x} {P : A -> Type} (Q : forall a, P a -> Prop) (u : sigT (Q x)) {y} (H : x = y) - : rew [fun a => sigT (Q a)] H in u + Lemma rew_sigT {A x} {P : A -> Type} (Q : forall a, P a -> Prop) (u : { p : P x & Q x p }) {y} (H : x = y) + : rew [fun a => { p : P a & Q a p }] H in u = existT (Q y) (rew H in projT1 u) @@ -308,18 +308,18 @@ End sigT. (** Equality for [sig] *) Section sig. Local Unset Implicit Arguments. - Definition proj1_sig_eq {A} {P : A -> Prop} {u v : sig P} (p : u = v) + Definition proj1_sig_eq {A} {P : A -> Prop} {u v : { a : A | P a }} (p : u = v) : proj1_sig u = proj1_sig v := f_equal (@proj1_sig _ _) p. - Definition proj2_sig_eq {A} {P : A -> Prop} {u v : sig P} (p : u = v) + Definition proj2_sig_eq {A} {P : A -> Prop} {u v : { a : A | P a }} (p : u = v) : rew proj1_sig_eq p in proj2_sig u = proj2_sig v. Proof. destruct p; reflexivity. Defined. - Definition eq_sig_uncurried {A : Type} {P : A -> Prop} (u v : sig P) - (pq : {p : proj1_sig u = proj1_sig v | rew p in proj2_sig u = proj2_sig v}) + Definition eq_sig_uncurried {A : Type} {P : A -> Prop} (u v : { a : A | P a }) + (pq : { p : proj1_sig u = proj1_sig v | rew p in proj2_sig u = proj2_sig v }) : u = v. Proof. destruct u as [u1 u2], v as [v1 v2]; simpl in *. @@ -328,38 +328,38 @@ Section sig. destruct p; reflexivity. Defined. - Definition eq_sig {A : Type} {P : A -> Prop} (u v : sig P) + Definition eq_sig {A : Type} {P : A -> Prop} (u v : { a : A | P a }) (p : proj1_sig u = proj1_sig v) (q : rew p in proj2_sig u = proj2_sig v) : u = v := eq_sig_uncurried u v (exist _ p q). - Definition eq_sig_rect {A P} {u v : @sig A P} (Q : u = v -> Type) + Definition eq_sig_rect {A P} {u v : { a : A | P a }} (Q : u = v -> Type) (f : forall p q, Q (eq_sig u v p q)) : forall p, Q p. Proof. intro p; specialize (f (proj1_sig_eq p) (proj2_sig_eq p)); destruct u, p; exact f. Defined. - Definition eq_sig_rec {A P u v} (Q : u = v :> @sig A P -> Set) := eq_sig_rect Q. - Definition eq_sig_ind {A P u v} (Q : u = v :> @sig A P -> Prop) := eq_sig_rec Q. + Definition eq_sig_rec {A P u v} (Q : u = v :> { a : A | P a } -> Set) := eq_sig_rect Q. + Definition eq_sig_ind {A P u v} (Q : u = v :> { a : A | P a } -> Prop) := eq_sig_rec Q. Definition eq_sig_hprop {A} {P : A -> Prop} (P_hprop : forall (x : A) (p q : P x), p = q) - (u v : @sig A P) + (u v : { a : A | P a }) (p : proj1_sig u = proj1_sig v) : u = v := eq_sig u v p (P_hprop _ _ _). Definition eq_sig_uncurried_iff {A} {P : A -> Prop} - (u v : @sig A P) - : u = v <-> (sig (fun p : proj1_sig u = proj1_sig v => rew p in proj2_sig u = proj2_sig v)). + (u v : { a : A | P a }) + : u = v <-> { p : proj1_sig u = proj1_sig v | rew p in proj2_sig u = proj2_sig v }. Proof. split; [ intro; subst; exists eq_refl; reflexivity | apply eq_sig_uncurried ]. Defined. Definition eq_sig_hprop_iff {A} {P : A -> Prop} (P_hprop : forall (x : A) (p q : P x), p = q) - (u v : @sig A P) + (u v : { a : A | P a }) : u = v <-> (proj1_sig u = proj1_sig v) := conj (fun p => f_equal (@proj1_sig _ _) p) (eq_sig_hprop P_hprop u v). - Lemma rew_sig {A x} {P : A -> Type} (Q : forall a, P a -> Prop) (u : sig (Q x)) {y} (H : x = y) - : rew [fun a => sig (Q a)] H in u + Lemma rew_sig {A x} {P : A -> Type} (Q : forall a, P a -> Prop) (u : { p : P x | Q x p }) {y} (H : x = y) + : rew [fun a => { p : P a | Q a p }] H in u = exist (Q y) (rew H in proj1_sig u) @@ -377,29 +377,29 @@ Section sigT2. Local Coercion sigT_of_sigT2 : sigT2 >-> sigT. Local Unset Implicit Arguments. (** Projecting an equality of a pair to equality of the first components *) - Definition sigT_of_sigT2_eq {A} {P Q : A -> Type} {u v : sigT2 P Q} (p : u = v) - : u = v :> sigT _ + Definition sigT_of_sigT2_eq {A} {P Q : A -> Type} {u v : { a : A & P a & Q a }} (p : u = v) + : u = v :> { a : A & P a } := f_equal _ p. - Definition projT1_of_sigT2_eq {A} {P Q : A -> Type} {u v : sigT2 P Q} (p : u = v) + Definition projT1_of_sigT2_eq {A} {P Q : A -> Type} {u v : { a : A & P a & Q a }} (p : u = v) : projT1 u = projT1 v := projT1_eq (sigT_of_sigT2_eq p). (** Projecting an equality of a pair to equality of the second components *) - Definition projT2_of_sigT2_eq {A} {P Q : A -> Type} {u v : sigT2 P Q} (p : u = v) + Definition projT2_of_sigT2_eq {A} {P Q : A -> Type} {u v : { a : A & P a & Q a }} (p : u = v) : rew projT1_of_sigT2_eq p in projT2 u = projT2 v. Proof. destruct p; reflexivity. Defined. (** Projecting an equality of a pair to equality of the third components *) - Definition projT3_eq {A} {P Q : A -> Type} {u v : sigT2 P Q} (p : u = v) + Definition projT3_eq {A} {P Q : A -> Type} {u v : { a : A & P a & Q a }} (p : u = v) : rew projT1_of_sigT2_eq p in projT3 u = projT3 v. Proof. destruct p; reflexivity. Defined. (** Equality of [sigT2] is itself a [sigT2] *) - Definition eq_sigT2_uncurried {A : Type} {P Q : A -> Type} (u v : sigT2 P Q) + Definition eq_sigT2_uncurried {A : Type} {P Q : A -> Type} (u v : { a : A & P a & Q a }) (pqr : { p : projT1 u = projT1 v & rew p in projT2 u = projT2 v & rew p in projT3 u = projT3 v }) : u = v. @@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ Section sigT2. Defined. (** Curried version of proving equality of sigma types *) - Definition eq_sigT2 {A : Type} {P Q : A -> Type} (u v : sigT2 P Q) + Definition eq_sigT2 {A : Type} {P Q : A -> Type} (u v : { a : A & P a & Q a }) (p : projT1 u = projT1 v) (q : rew p in projT2 u = projT2 v) (r : rew p in projT3 u = projT3 v) @@ -420,8 +420,8 @@ Section sigT2. (** Equality of [sigT2] when the second property is an hProp *) Definition eq_sigT2_hprop {A P Q} (Q_hprop : forall (x : A) (p q : Q x), p = q) - (u v : @sigT2 A P Q) - (p : u = v :> sigT _) + (u v : { a : A & P a & Q a }) + (p : u = v :> { a : A & P a }) : u = v := eq_sigT2 u v (projT1_eq p) (projT2_eq p) (Q_hprop _ _ _). @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ Section sigT2. don't. If we wanted to deal with proofs of equality of Σ types in dependent positions, we'd need it. *) Definition eq_sigT2_uncurried_iff {A P Q} - (u v : @sigT2 A P Q) + (u v : { a : A & P a & Q a }) : u = v <-> { p : projT1 u = projT1 v & rew p in projT2 u = projT2 v & rew p in projT3 u = projT3 v }. @@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ Section sigT2. Defined. (** Induction principle for [@eq (sigT2 _ _)] *) - Definition eq_sigT2_rect {A P Q} {u v : @sigT2 A P Q} (R : u = v -> Type) + Definition eq_sigT2_rect {A P Q} {u v : { a : A & P a & Q a }} (R : u = v -> Type) (f : forall p q r, R (eq_sigT2 u v p q r)) : forall p, R p. Proof. @@ -447,26 +447,26 @@ Section sigT2. specialize (f (projT1_of_sigT2_eq p) (projT2_of_sigT2_eq p) (projT3_eq p)). destruct u, p; exact f. Defined. - Definition eq_sigT2_rec {A P Q u v} (R : u = v :> @sigT2 A P Q -> Set) := eq_sigT2_rect R. - Definition eq_sigT2_ind {A P Q u v} (R : u = v :> @sigT2 A P Q -> Prop) := eq_sigT2_rec R. + Definition eq_sigT2_rec {A P Q u v} (R : u = v :> { a : A & P a & Q a } -> Set) := eq_sigT2_rect R. + Definition eq_sigT2_ind {A P Q u v} (R : u = v :> { a : A & P a & Q a } -> Prop) := eq_sigT2_rec R. (** Equivalence of equality of [sigT2] involving hProps with equality of the first components *) Definition eq_sigT2_hprop_iff {A P Q} (Q_hprop : forall (x : A) (p q : Q x), p = q) - (u v : @sigT2 A P Q) - : u = v <-> (u = v :> sigT _) + (u v : { a : A & P a & Q a }) + : u = v <-> (u = v :> { a : A & P a }) := conj (fun p => f_equal (@sigT_of_sigT2 _ _ _) p) (eq_sigT2_hprop Q_hprop u v). (** Non-dependent classification of equality of [sigT] *) - Definition eq_sigT2_nondep {A B C : Type} (u v : @sigT2 A (fun _ => B) (fun _ => C)) + Definition eq_sigT2_nondep {A B C : Type} (u v : { a : A & B & C }) (p : projT1 u = projT1 v) (q : projT2 u = projT2 v) (r : projT3 u = projT3 v) : u = v := @eq_sigT2 _ _ _ u v p (eq_trans (rew_const _ _) q) (eq_trans (rew_const _ _) r). (** Classification of transporting across an equality of [sigT2]s *) Lemma rew_sigT2 {A x} {P : A -> Type} (Q R : forall a, P a -> Prop) - (u : sigT2 (Q x) (R x)) + (u : { p : P x & Q x p & R x p }) {y} (H : x = y) - : rew [fun a => sigT2 (Q a) (R a)] H in u + : rew [fun a => { p : P a & Q a p & R a p }] H in u = existT2 (Q y) (R y) @@ -488,29 +488,29 @@ Section sig2. Local Coercion sig_of_sig2 : sig2 >-> sig. Local Unset Implicit Arguments. (** Projecting an equality of a pair to equality of the first components *) - Definition sig_of_sig2_eq {A} {P Q : A -> Prop} {u v : sig2 P Q} (p : u = v) - : u = v :> sig _ + Definition sig_of_sig2_eq {A} {P Q : A -> Prop} {u v : { a : A | P a & Q a }} (p : u = v) + : u = v :> { a : A | P a } := f_equal _ p. - Definition proj1_sig_of_sig2_eq {A} {P Q : A -> Prop} {u v : sig2 P Q} (p : u = v) + Definition proj1_sig_of_sig2_eq {A} {P Q : A -> Prop} {u v : { a : A | P a & Q a }} (p : u = v) : proj1_sig u = proj1_sig v := proj1_sig_eq (sig_of_sig2_eq p). (** Projecting an equality of a pair to equality of the second components *) - Definition proj2_sig_of_sig2_eq {A} {P Q : A -> Prop} {u v : sig2 P Q} (p : u = v) + Definition proj2_sig_of_sig2_eq {A} {P Q : A -> Prop} {u v : { a : A | P a & Q a }} (p : u = v) : rew proj1_sig_of_sig2_eq p in proj2_sig u = proj2_sig v. Proof. destruct p; reflexivity. Defined. (** Projecting an equality of a pair to equality of the third components *) - Definition proj3_sig_eq {A} {P Q : A -> Prop} {u v : sig2 P Q} (p : u = v) + Definition proj3_sig_eq {A} {P Q : A -> Prop} {u v : { a : A | P a & Q a }} (p : u = v) : rew proj1_sig_of_sig2_eq p in proj3_sig u = proj3_sig v. Proof. destruct p; reflexivity. Defined. (** Equality of [sig2] is itself a [sig2] *) - Definition eq_sig2_uncurried {A} {P Q : A -> Prop} (u v : sig2 P Q) + Definition eq_sig2_uncurried {A} {P Q : A -> Prop} (u v : { a : A | P a & Q a }) (pqr : { p : proj1_sig u = proj1_sig v | rew p in proj2_sig u = proj2_sig v & rew p in proj3_sig u = proj3_sig v }) : u = v. @@ -522,7 +522,7 @@ Section sig2. Defined. (** Curried version of proving equality of sigma types *) - Definition eq_sig2 {A} {P Q : A -> Prop} (u v : sig2 P Q) + Definition eq_sig2 {A} {P Q : A -> Prop} (u v : { a : A | P a & Q a }) (p : proj1_sig u = proj1_sig v) (q : rew p in proj2_sig u = proj2_sig v) (r : rew p in proj3_sig u = proj3_sig v) @@ -531,8 +531,8 @@ Section sig2. (** Equality of [sig2] when the second property is an hProp *) Definition eq_sig2_hprop {A} {P Q : A -> Prop} (Q_hprop : forall (x : A) (p q : Q x), p = q) - (u v : @sig2 A P Q) - (p : u = v :> sig _) + (u v : { a : A | P a & Q a }) + (p : u = v :> { a : A | P a }) : u = v := eq_sig2 u v (proj1_sig_eq p) (proj2_sig_eq p) (Q_hprop _ _ _). @@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ Section sig2. don't. If we wanted to deal with proofs of equality of Σ types in dependent positions, we'd need it. *) Definition eq_sig2_uncurried_iff {A P Q} - (u v : @sig2 A P Q) + (u v : { a : A | P a & Q a }) : u = v <-> { p : proj1_sig u = proj1_sig v | rew p in proj2_sig u = proj2_sig v & rew p in proj3_sig u = proj3_sig v }. @@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ Section sig2. Defined. (** Induction principle for [@eq (sig2 _ _)] *) - Definition eq_sig2_rect {A P Q} {u v : @sig2 A P Q} (R : u = v -> Type) + Definition eq_sig2_rect {A P Q} {u v : { a : A | P a & Q a }} (R : u = v -> Type) (f : forall p q r, R (eq_sig2 u v p q r)) : forall p, R p. Proof. @@ -558,13 +558,13 @@ Section sig2. specialize (f (proj1_sig_of_sig2_eq p) (proj2_sig_of_sig2_eq p) (proj3_sig_eq p)). destruct u, p; exact f. Defined. - Definition eq_sig2_rec {A P Q u v} (R : u = v :> @sig2 A P Q -> Set) := eq_sig2_rect R. - Definition eq_sig2_ind {A P Q u v} (R : u = v :> @sig2 A P Q -> Prop) := eq_sig2_rec R. + Definition eq_sig2_rec {A P Q u v} (R : u = v :> { a : A | P a & Q a } -> Set) := eq_sig2_rect R. + Definition eq_sig2_ind {A P Q u v} (R : u = v :> { a : A | P a & Q a } -> Prop) := eq_sig2_rec R. (** Equivalence of equality of [sig2] involving hProps with equality of the first components *) Definition eq_sig2_hprop_iff {A} {P Q : A -> Prop} (Q_hprop : forall (x : A) (p q : Q x), p = q) - (u v : @sig2 A P Q) - : u = v <-> (u = v :> sig _) + (u v : { a : A | P a & Q a }) + : u = v <-> (u = v :> { a : A | P a }) := conj (fun p => f_equal (@sig_of_sig2 _ _ _) p) (eq_sig2_hprop Q_hprop u v). (** Non-dependent classification of equality of [sig] *) @@ -575,9 +575,9 @@ Section sig2. (** Classification of transporting across an equality of [sig2]s *) Lemma rew_sig2 {A x} {P : A -> Type} (Q R : forall a, P a -> Prop) - (u : sig2 (Q x) (R x)) + (u : { p : P x | Q x p & R x p }) {y} (H : x = y) - : rew [fun a => sig2 (Q a) (R a)] H in u + : rew [fun a => { p : P a | Q a p & R a p }] H in u = exist2 (Q y) (R y) |