diff options
author | filliatr <filliatr@85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7> | 2000-03-10 17:46:01 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | filliatr <filliatr@85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7> | 2000-03-10 17:46:01 +0000 |
commit | 9f8ccadf2f68ff44ee81d782b6881b9cc3c04c4b (patch) | |
tree | cb38ff6db4ade84d47f9788ae7bc821767abf638 /theories/Arith/Wf_nat.v | |
parent | 20b4a46e9956537a0bb21c5eacf2539dee95cb67 (diff) |
mise sous CVS du repertoire theories/Arith
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@311 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
Diffstat (limited to 'theories/Arith/Wf_nat.v')
-rwxr-xr-x | theories/Arith/Wf_nat.v | 137 |
1 files changed, 137 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/theories/Arith/Wf_nat.v b/theories/Arith/Wf_nat.v new file mode 100755 index 000000000..225ebeff5 --- /dev/null +++ b/theories/Arith/Wf_nat.v @@ -0,0 +1,137 @@ + +(* $Id$ *) + +(* Well-founded relations and natural numbers *) + +Require Lt. + +Chapter Well_founded_Nat. + +Variable A : Set. + +Variable f : A -> nat. +Definition ltof := [a,b:A](lt (f a) (f b)). +Definition gtof := [a,b:A](gt (f b) (f a)). + +Theorem well_founded_ltof : (well_founded A ltof). +Proof. +Red. +Cut (n:nat)(a:A)(lt (f a) n)->(Acc A ltof a). +Intros H a; Apply (H (S (f a))); Auto with arith. +Induction n. +Intros; Absurd (lt (f a) O); Auto with arith. +Intros m Hm a ltSma. +Apply Acc_intro. +Unfold ltof; Intros b ltfafb. +Apply Hm. +Apply lt_le_trans with (f a); Auto with arith. +Qed. + +Theorem well_founded_gtof : (well_founded A gtof). +Proof well_founded_ltof. + +(* It is possible to directly prove the induction principle going + back to primitive recursion on natural numbers (induction_ltof1) + or to use the previous lemmas to extract a program with a fixpoint + (induction_ltof2) +the ML-like program for induction_ltof1 is : + let induction_ltof1 F a = indrec ((f a)+1) a + where rec indrec = + function 0 -> (function a -> error) + |(S m) -> (function a -> (F a (function y -> indrec y m)));; +the ML-like program for induction_ltof2 is : + let induction_ltof2 F a = indrec a + where rec indrec a = F a indrec;; +*) + +Theorem induction_ltof1 : (P:A->Set)((x:A)((y:A)(ltof y x)->(P y))->(P x))->(a:A)(P a). +Proof. +Intros P F; Cut (n:nat)(a:A)(lt (f a) n)->(P a). +Intros H a; Apply (H (S (f a))); Auto with arith. +Induction n. +Intros; Absurd (lt (f a) O); Auto with arith. +Intros m Hm a ltSma. +Apply F. +Unfold ltof; Intros b ltfafb. +Apply Hm. +Apply lt_le_trans with (f a); Auto with arith. +Qed. + +Theorem induction_gtof1 : (P:A->Set)((x:A)((y:A)(gtof y x)->(P y))->(P x))->(a:A)(P a). +Proof induction_ltof1. + +Theorem induction_ltof2 + : (P:A->Set)((x:A)((y:A)(ltof y x)->(P y))->(P x))->(a:A)(P a). +Proof (well_founded_induction A ltof well_founded_ltof). + +Theorem induction_gtof2 : (P:A->Set)((x:A)((y:A)(gtof y x)->(P y))->(P x))->(a:A)(P a). +Proof induction_ltof2. + + +(* If a relation R is compatible with lt i.e. if x R y => f(x) < f(y) + then R is well-founded. *) + +Variable R : A->A->Prop. + +Hypothesis H_compat : (x,y:A) (R x y) -> (lt (f x) (f y)). + +Theorem well_founded_lt_compat : (well_founded A R). +Proof. +Red. +Cut (n:nat)(a:A)(lt (f a) n)->(Acc A R a). +Intros H a; Apply (H (S (f a))); Auto with arith. +Induction n. +Intros; Absurd (lt (f a) O); Auto with arith. +Intros m Hm a ltSma. +Apply Acc_intro. +Intros b ltfafb. +Apply Hm. +Apply lt_le_trans with (f a); Auto with arith. +Save. + +End Well_founded_Nat. + +Lemma lt_wf : (well_founded nat lt). +Proof (well_founded_ltof nat [m:nat]m). + +Lemma lt_wf_rec1 : (p:nat)(P:nat->Set) + ((n:nat)((m:nat)(lt m n)->(P m))->(P n)) -> (P p). +Proof [p:nat][P:nat->Set][F:(n:nat)((m:nat)(lt m n)->(P m))->(P n)] + (induction_ltof1 nat [m:nat]m P F p). + +Lemma lt_wf_rec : (p:nat)(P:nat->Set) + ((n:nat)((m:nat)(lt m n)->(P m))->(P n)) -> (P p). +Proof [p:nat][P:nat->Set][F:(n:nat)((m:nat)(lt m n)->(P m))->(P n)] + (induction_ltof2 nat [m:nat]m P F p). + +Lemma lt_wf_ind : (p:nat)(P:nat->Prop) + ((n:nat)((m:nat)(lt m n)->(P m))->(P n)) -> (P p). +Intros; Elim (lt_wf p); Auto with arith. +Save. + +Lemma gt_wf_rec : (p:nat)(P:nat->Set) + ((n:nat)((m:nat)(gt n m)->(P m))->(P n)) -> (P p). +Proof lt_wf_rec. + +Lemma gt_wf_ind : (p:nat)(P:nat->Prop) + ((n:nat)((m:nat)(gt n m)->(P m))->(P n)) -> (P p). +Proof lt_wf_ind. + +Lemma lt_wf_double_rec : + (P:nat->nat->Set) + ((n,m:nat)((p,q:nat)(lt p n)->(P p q))->((p:nat)(lt p m)->(P n p))->(P n m)) + -> (p,q:nat)(P p q). +Intros P Hrec p; Pattern p; Apply lt_wf_rec. +Intros; Pattern q; Apply lt_wf_rec; Auto with arith. +Save. + +Lemma lt_wf_double_ind : + (P:nat->nat->Prop) + ((n,m:nat)((p,q:nat)(lt p n)->(P p q))->((p:nat)(lt p m)->(P n p))->(P n m)) + -> (p,q:nat)(P p q). +Intros P Hrec p; Pattern p; Apply lt_wf_ind. +Intros; Pattern q; Apply lt_wf_ind; Auto with arith. +Save. + +Hints Resolve lt_wf : arith. +Hints Resolve well_founded_lt_compat : arith. |