A generic preprocessing tactic zify for (r)omega

------------------------------------------------ 

See file PreOmega for more details and/or test-suite/succes/*Omega*.v

The zify tactic performs a Z-ification of your current goal,
transforming parts of type nat, N, positive, taking advantage of many
equivalences of operations, and of the positivity implied by these
types.

Integration with omega and romega:
 (r)omega : the earlier tactics, 100% compatible 
 (r)omega with * : full zify applied before the (r)omega run
 (r)omega with <types>, where <types> is a sub-list of {nat,N,positive,Z}, 
   applies only specific parts of zify (btw "with Z" means take advantage 
   of Zmax, Zmin, Zabs and Zsgn). 

As a particular consequence, "romega with nat" should now be a
close-to-perfect replacement for omega. Slightly more powerful, since
(forall x:nat, x*x>=0) is provable and also slightly less powerful: if
False is somewhere in the hypothesis, it doesn't use it. 

For the moment zify is done in a direct way in Ltac, using rewrite
when necessary, but crucial chains of rewrite may be made reflexive
some day.

Even though zify is designed to help (r)omega, I think it might be 
of interest for other tactics (micromega ?). Feel free to complete
zify if your favorite operation / type isn't handled yet. 


Side-effects: 

- additional results for ZArith, NArith, etc...
- definition of Ple, Plt, Pgt, Pge and notations for them in positive_scope
- romega now start by doing "intros". Since the conclusion will be negated, 
  and this operation will be justified by means of decidability, it helps
  to have as little as possible in the conclusion. 






git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@10028 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/test-suite/success/Omega.v b/test-suite/success/Omega.v
index 2d29a8356..ecbf04e41 100644
--- a/test-suite/success/Omega.v
+++ b/test-suite/success/Omega.v
@@ -10,14 +10,14 @@ intros x y.
  omega.
 Qed.
 
-(* Proposed by Pierre Crégut *)
+(* Proposed by Pierre Crégut *)
 
 Lemma lem2 : forall x : Z, (x < 4)%Z -> (x > 2)%Z -> x = 3%Z.
 intro.
  omega.
 Qed.
 
-(* Proposed by Jean-Christophe Filliâtre *)
+(* Proposed by Jean-Christophe Filliâtre *)
 
 Lemma lem3 : forall x y : Z, x = y -> (x + x)%Z = (y + y)%Z.
 Proof.
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ intros.
  omega.
 Qed.
 
-(* Proposed by Jean-Christophe Filliâtre: confusion between an Omega *)
+(* Proposed by Jean-Christophe Filliâtre: confusion between an Omega *)
 (* internal variable and a section variable (June 2001) *)
 
 Section A.
@@ -87,10 +87,8 @@ Qed.
 
 (* Check that the interpretation of mult on nat enforces its positivity *)
 (* Submitted by Hubert Thierry (bug #743) *)
-(* Postponed... problem with goals of the form "(n*m=0)%nat -> (n*m=0)%Z"
-Require Omega.
-Lemma lem10 : (n, m : nat) (le n (plus n (mult n m))).
+(* Postponed... problem with goals of the form "(n*m=0)%nat -> (n*m=0)%Z" *)
+Lemma lem10 : forall n m:nat, le n (plus n (mult n m)).
 Proof.
-Intros; Omega.
+intros; omega with *.
 Qed.
-*)