aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffhomepage
path: root/test-suite/output
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGravatar Maxime Dénès <mail@maximedenes.fr>2017-06-14 17:57:28 +0200
committerGravatar Maxime Dénès <mail@maximedenes.fr>2017-06-14 17:57:28 +0200
commitd7dc4d4082d76e480b6d9932dcfad64249565e80 (patch)
tree47c24efb25606259c3e0d9c2ac4da2160880a47e /test-suite/output
parent510879170dae6edb989c76a96ded0ed00f192173 (diff)
parentf713e6c195d1de177b43cab7c2902f5160f6af9f (diff)
Merge PR#513: A fix to #5414 (ident bound by ltac names now known for "match").
Diffstat (limited to 'test-suite/output')
-rw-r--r--test-suite/output/Cases.out46
-rw-r--r--test-suite/output/Cases.v63
2 files changed, 109 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/test-suite/output/Cases.out b/test-suite/output/Cases.out
index f064dfe76..97fa8e254 100644
--- a/test-suite/output/Cases.out
+++ b/test-suite/output/Cases.out
@@ -80,3 +80,49 @@ fun '(D n m p q) => n + m + p + q
: J -> nat
The command has indeed failed with message:
The constructor D (in type J) expects 3 arguments.
+lem1 =
+fun dd : nat * nat => let (bb, cc) as aa return (aa = aa) := dd in eq_refl
+ : forall k : nat * nat, k = k
+lem2 =
+fun dd : bool => if dd as aa return (aa = aa) then eq_refl else eq_refl
+ : forall k : bool, k = k
+
+Argument scope is [bool_scope]
+lem3 =
+fun dd : nat * nat => let (bb, cc) as aa return (aa = aa) := dd in eq_refl
+ : forall k : nat * nat, k = k
+1 subgoal
+
+ x : nat
+ n, n0 := match x + 0 with
+ | 0 => 0
+ | S _ => 0
+ end : nat
+ e,
+ e0 := match x + 0 as y return (y = y) with
+ | 0 => eq_refl
+ | S n => eq_refl
+ end : x + 0 = x + 0
+ n1, n2 := match x with
+ | 0 => 0
+ | S _ => 0
+ end : nat
+ e1, e2 := match x return (x = x) with
+ | 0 => eq_refl
+ | S n => eq_refl
+ end : x = x
+ ============================
+ x + 0 = 0
+1 subgoal
+
+ p : nat
+ a,
+ a0 := match eq_refl as y in (_ = e) return (y = y /\ e = e) with
+ | eq_refl => conj eq_refl eq_refl
+ end : eq_refl = eq_refl /\ p = p
+ a1,
+ a2 := match eq_refl in (_ = e) return (p = p /\ e = e) with
+ | eq_refl => conj eq_refl eq_refl
+ end : p = p /\ p = p
+ ============================
+ eq_refl = eq_refl
diff --git a/test-suite/output/Cases.v b/test-suite/output/Cases.v
index 6a4fd007d..17fee3303 100644
--- a/test-suite/output/Cases.v
+++ b/test-suite/output/Cases.v
@@ -121,3 +121,66 @@ Check fun x => let '(D n m p q) := x in n+m+p+q.
(* This used to succeed, being interpreted as "let '{{n, m, p}} := ..." *)
Fail Check fun x : J => let '{{n, m, _}} p := x in n + m + p.
+
+(* Test use of idents bound to ltac names in a "match" *)
+
+Lemma lem1 : forall k, k=k :>nat * nat.
+let x := fresh "aa" in
+let y := fresh "bb" in
+let z := fresh "cc" in
+let k := fresh "dd" in
+refine (fun k : nat * nat => match k as x return x = x with (y,z) => eq_refl end).
+Qed.
+Print lem1.
+
+Lemma lem2 : forall k, k=k :> bool.
+let x := fresh "aa" in
+let y := fresh "bb" in
+let z := fresh "cc" in
+let k := fresh "dd" in
+refine (fun k => if k as x return x = x then eq_refl else eq_refl).
+Qed.
+Print lem2.
+
+Lemma lem3 : forall k, k=k :>nat * nat.
+let x := fresh "aa" in
+let y := fresh "bb" in
+let z := fresh "cc" in
+let k := fresh "dd" in
+refine (fun k : nat * nat => let (y,z) as x return x = x := k in eq_refl).
+Qed.
+Print lem3.
+
+Lemma lem4 x : x+0=0.
+match goal with |- ?y = _ => pose (match y with 0 => 0 | S n => 0 end) end.
+match goal with |- ?y = _ => pose (match y as y with 0 => 0 | S n => 0 end) end.
+match goal with |- ?y = _ => pose (match y as y return y=y with 0 => eq_refl | S n => eq_refl end) end.
+match goal with |- ?y = _ => pose (match y return y=y with 0 => eq_refl | S n => eq_refl end) end.
+match goal with |- ?y + _ = _ => pose (match y with 0 => 0 | S n => 0 end) end.
+match goal with |- ?y + _ = _ => pose (match y as y with 0 => 0 | S n => 0 end) end.
+match goal with |- ?y + _ = _ => pose (match y as y return y=y with 0 => eq_refl | S n => eq_refl end) end.
+match goal with |- ?y + _ = _ => pose (match y return y=y with 0 => eq_refl | S n => eq_refl end) end.
+Show.
+
+Lemma lem5 (p:nat) : eq_refl p = eq_refl p.
+let y := fresh "n" in (* Checking that y is hidden *)
+ let z := fresh "e" in (* Checking that z is hidden *)
+ match goal with
+ |- ?y = _ => pose (match y as y in _ = z return y=y /\ z=z with eq_refl => conj eq_refl eq_refl end)
+ end.
+let y := fresh "n" in
+ let z := fresh "e" in
+ match goal with
+ |- ?y = _ => pose (match y in _ = z return y=y /\ z=z with eq_refl => conj eq_refl eq_refl end)
+ end.
+let y := fresh "n" in
+ let z := fresh "e" in
+ match goal with
+ |- eq_refl ?y = _ => pose (match eq_refl y in _ = z return y=y /\ z=z with eq_refl => conj eq_refl eq_refl end)
+ end.
+let p := fresh "p" in
+ let z := fresh "e" in
+ match goal with
+ |- eq_refl ?p = _ => pose (match eq_refl p in _ = z return p=p /\ z=z with eq_refl => conj eq_refl eq_refl end)
+ end.
+Show.