diff options
author | Maxime Dénès <mail@maximedenes.fr> | 2017-06-14 17:57:28 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Maxime Dénès <mail@maximedenes.fr> | 2017-06-14 17:57:28 +0200 |
commit | d7dc4d4082d76e480b6d9932dcfad64249565e80 (patch) | |
tree | 47c24efb25606259c3e0d9c2ac4da2160880a47e /test-suite/output | |
parent | 510879170dae6edb989c76a96ded0ed00f192173 (diff) | |
parent | f713e6c195d1de177b43cab7c2902f5160f6af9f (diff) |
Merge PR#513: A fix to #5414 (ident bound by ltac names now known for "match").
Diffstat (limited to 'test-suite/output')
-rw-r--r-- | test-suite/output/Cases.out | 46 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | test-suite/output/Cases.v | 63 |
2 files changed, 109 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/test-suite/output/Cases.out b/test-suite/output/Cases.out index f064dfe76..97fa8e254 100644 --- a/test-suite/output/Cases.out +++ b/test-suite/output/Cases.out @@ -80,3 +80,49 @@ fun '(D n m p q) => n + m + p + q : J -> nat The command has indeed failed with message: The constructor D (in type J) expects 3 arguments. +lem1 = +fun dd : nat * nat => let (bb, cc) as aa return (aa = aa) := dd in eq_refl + : forall k : nat * nat, k = k +lem2 = +fun dd : bool => if dd as aa return (aa = aa) then eq_refl else eq_refl + : forall k : bool, k = k + +Argument scope is [bool_scope] +lem3 = +fun dd : nat * nat => let (bb, cc) as aa return (aa = aa) := dd in eq_refl + : forall k : nat * nat, k = k +1 subgoal + + x : nat + n, n0 := match x + 0 with + | 0 => 0 + | S _ => 0 + end : nat + e, + e0 := match x + 0 as y return (y = y) with + | 0 => eq_refl + | S n => eq_refl + end : x + 0 = x + 0 + n1, n2 := match x with + | 0 => 0 + | S _ => 0 + end : nat + e1, e2 := match x return (x = x) with + | 0 => eq_refl + | S n => eq_refl + end : x = x + ============================ + x + 0 = 0 +1 subgoal + + p : nat + a, + a0 := match eq_refl as y in (_ = e) return (y = y /\ e = e) with + | eq_refl => conj eq_refl eq_refl + end : eq_refl = eq_refl /\ p = p + a1, + a2 := match eq_refl in (_ = e) return (p = p /\ e = e) with + | eq_refl => conj eq_refl eq_refl + end : p = p /\ p = p + ============================ + eq_refl = eq_refl diff --git a/test-suite/output/Cases.v b/test-suite/output/Cases.v index 6a4fd007d..17fee3303 100644 --- a/test-suite/output/Cases.v +++ b/test-suite/output/Cases.v @@ -121,3 +121,66 @@ Check fun x => let '(D n m p q) := x in n+m+p+q. (* This used to succeed, being interpreted as "let '{{n, m, p}} := ..." *) Fail Check fun x : J => let '{{n, m, _}} p := x in n + m + p. + +(* Test use of idents bound to ltac names in a "match" *) + +Lemma lem1 : forall k, k=k :>nat * nat. +let x := fresh "aa" in +let y := fresh "bb" in +let z := fresh "cc" in +let k := fresh "dd" in +refine (fun k : nat * nat => match k as x return x = x with (y,z) => eq_refl end). +Qed. +Print lem1. + +Lemma lem2 : forall k, k=k :> bool. +let x := fresh "aa" in +let y := fresh "bb" in +let z := fresh "cc" in +let k := fresh "dd" in +refine (fun k => if k as x return x = x then eq_refl else eq_refl). +Qed. +Print lem2. + +Lemma lem3 : forall k, k=k :>nat * nat. +let x := fresh "aa" in +let y := fresh "bb" in +let z := fresh "cc" in +let k := fresh "dd" in +refine (fun k : nat * nat => let (y,z) as x return x = x := k in eq_refl). +Qed. +Print lem3. + +Lemma lem4 x : x+0=0. +match goal with |- ?y = _ => pose (match y with 0 => 0 | S n => 0 end) end. +match goal with |- ?y = _ => pose (match y as y with 0 => 0 | S n => 0 end) end. +match goal with |- ?y = _ => pose (match y as y return y=y with 0 => eq_refl | S n => eq_refl end) end. +match goal with |- ?y = _ => pose (match y return y=y with 0 => eq_refl | S n => eq_refl end) end. +match goal with |- ?y + _ = _ => pose (match y with 0 => 0 | S n => 0 end) end. +match goal with |- ?y + _ = _ => pose (match y as y with 0 => 0 | S n => 0 end) end. +match goal with |- ?y + _ = _ => pose (match y as y return y=y with 0 => eq_refl | S n => eq_refl end) end. +match goal with |- ?y + _ = _ => pose (match y return y=y with 0 => eq_refl | S n => eq_refl end) end. +Show. + +Lemma lem5 (p:nat) : eq_refl p = eq_refl p. +let y := fresh "n" in (* Checking that y is hidden *) + let z := fresh "e" in (* Checking that z is hidden *) + match goal with + |- ?y = _ => pose (match y as y in _ = z return y=y /\ z=z with eq_refl => conj eq_refl eq_refl end) + end. +let y := fresh "n" in + let z := fresh "e" in + match goal with + |- ?y = _ => pose (match y in _ = z return y=y /\ z=z with eq_refl => conj eq_refl eq_refl end) + end. +let y := fresh "n" in + let z := fresh "e" in + match goal with + |- eq_refl ?y = _ => pose (match eq_refl y in _ = z return y=y /\ z=z with eq_refl => conj eq_refl eq_refl end) + end. +let p := fresh "p" in + let z := fresh "e" in + match goal with + |- eq_refl ?p = _ => pose (match eq_refl p in _ = z return p=p /\ z=z with eq_refl => conj eq_refl eq_refl end) + end. +Show. |