diff options
author | aspiwack <aspiwack@85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7> | 2013-11-02 15:34:01 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | aspiwack <aspiwack@85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7> | 2013-11-02 15:34:01 +0000 |
commit | 260965dcf60d793ba01110ace8945cf51ef6531f (patch) | |
tree | d07323383e16bb5a63492e2721cf0502ba931716 /tactics/leminv.ml | |
parent | 328279514e65f47a689e2d23f132c43c86870c05 (diff) |
Makes the new Proofview.tactic the basic type of Ltac.
On the compilation of Coq, we can see an increase of ~20% compile time on
my completely non-scientific tests. Hopefully this can be fixed.
There are a lot of low hanging fruits, but this is an iso-functionality commit.
With a few exceptions which were not necessary for the compilation of the theories:
- The declarative mode is not yet ported
- The timeout tactical is currently deactivated because it needs some subtle
I/O. The framework is ready to handle it, but I haven't done it yet.
- For much the same reason, the ltac debugger is unplugged. It will be more
difficult, but will eventually be back.
A few comments:
I occasionnally used a coercion from [unit Proofview.tactic] to the old
[Prooftype.tactic]. It should work smoothely, but loses any backtracking
information: the coerced tactics has at most one success.
- It is used in autorewrite (it shouldn't be a problem there). Autorewrite's
code is fairly old and tricky
- It is used in eauto, mostly for "Hint Extern". It may be an issue as time goes
as we might want to have various success in a "Hint Extern". But it would
require a heavy port of eauto.ml4
- It is used in typeclass eauto, but with a little help from Matthieu, it should
be easy to port the whole thing to the new tactic engine, actually simplifying
the code.
- It is used in fourier. I believe it to be inocuous.
- It is used in firstorder and congruence. I think it's ok. Their code is
somewhat intricate and I'm not sure they would be easy to actually port.
- It is used heavily in Function. And honestly, I have no idea whether it can do
harm or not.
Updates:
(11 June 2013) Pierre-Marie Pédrot contributed the rebase over his new stream based
architecture for Ltac matching (r16533), which avoid painfully and expensively
working around the exception-throwing control flow of the previous API.
(11 October 2013) Rebasing over recent commits (somewhere in r16721-r16730)
rendered a major bug in my implementation of Tacticals.New.tclREPEAT_MAIN
apparent. It caused Field_theory.v to loop. The bug made rewrite !lemma,
rewrite ?lemma and autorewrite incorrect (tclREPEAT_MAIN was essentially
tclREPEAT, causing rewrites to be tried in the side-conditions of conditional
rewrites as well). The new implementation makes Coq faster, but it is
pretty much impossible to tell if it is significant at all.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@16967 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
Diffstat (limited to 'tactics/leminv.ml')
-rw-r--r-- | tactics/leminv.ml | 26 |
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/tactics/leminv.ml b/tactics/leminv.ml index 19e7153b5..00cf4e997 100644 --- a/tactics/leminv.ml +++ b/tactics/leminv.ml @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ open Declare open Tacticals open Tactics open Decl_kinds +open Proofview.Notations let no_inductive_inconstr env constr = (str "Cannot recognize an inductive predicate in " ++ @@ -196,8 +197,10 @@ let inversion_scheme env sigma t sort dep_option inv_op = (str"Computed inversion goal was not closed in initial signature."); *) let pf = Proof.start [invEnv,invGoal] in - let pf = Proof.run_tactic env - (Proofview.V82.tactic (tclTHEN intro (onLastHypId inv_op))) pf in + let pf = + Proof.run_tactic env ( + Tacticals.New.tclTHEN intro (Tacticals.New.onLastHypId inv_op)) pf + in let pfterm = List.hd (Proof.partial_proof pf) in let global_named_context = Global.named_context () in let ownSign = ref begin @@ -278,19 +281,20 @@ let lemInv id c gls = (str "Cannot refine current goal with the lemma " ++ pr_lconstr_env (Global.env()) c) -let lemInv_gen id c = try_intros_until (fun id -> lemInv id c) id +let lemInv_gen id c = try_intros_until (fun id -> Proofview.V82.tactic (lemInv id c)) id -let lemInvIn id c ids gls = - let hyps = List.map (pf_get_hyp gls) ids in - let intros_replace_ids gls = - let nb_of_new_hyp = nb_prod (pf_concl gls) - List.length ids in +let lemInvIn id c ids = + Goal.sensitive_list_map Tacmach.New.pf_get_hyp ids >>- fun hyps -> + let intros_replace_ids = + Goal.concl >>- fun concl -> + let nb_of_new_hyp = nb_prod concl - List.length ids in if nb_of_new_hyp < 1 then - intros_replacing ids gls + intros_replacing ids else - (tclTHEN (tclDO nb_of_new_hyp intro) (intros_replacing ids)) gls + (Tacticals.New.tclTHEN (Tacticals.New.tclDO nb_of_new_hyp intro) (intros_replacing ids)) in - ((tclTHEN (tclTHEN (bring_hyps hyps) (lemInv id c)) - (intros_replace_ids)) gls) + ((Tacticals.New.tclTHEN (Proofview.V82.tactic (tclTHEN (bring_hyps hyps) (lemInv id c))) + (intros_replace_ids))) let lemInvIn_gen id c l = try_intros_until (fun id -> lemInvIn id c l) id |