diff options
| author |  Hugo Herbelin <Hugo.Herbelin@inria.fr> | 2014-08-13 18:02:11 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Hugo Herbelin <Hugo.Herbelin@inria.fr> | 2014-08-18 18:56:38 +0200 |
| commit | 5c82bcd1f87cc893319f2553c81a73c69b13b54d (patch) | |
| tree | 83ca001f700b5fdb48d0fac8e249c08c589a1d15 /plugins/funind/indfun.mli | |
| parent | d5fece25d8964d5d9fcd55b66164286aeef5fb9f (diff) | |
Reorganisation of intropattern code
- emphasizing the different kinds of patterns
- factorizing code of the non-naming intro-patterns
Still some questions:
- Should -> and <- apply to hypotheses or not (currently they apply to
hypotheses either when used in assert-style tactics or apply in, or
when the term to rewrite is a variable, in which case "subst" is
applied)?
- Should "subst" be used when the -> or <- rewrites an equation x=t
posed by "assert" (i.e. rewrite everywhere and clearing x and hyp)?
- Should -> and <- be applicable in non assert-style if the lemma has
quantifications?
Diffstat (limited to 'plugins/funind/indfun.mli')
| -rw-r--r-- | plugins/funind/indfun.mli | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/plugins/funind/indfun.mli b/plugins/funind/indfun.mli index 91a5ddf82..f88a72ff5 100644 --- a/plugins/funind/indfun.mli +++ b/plugins/funind/indfun.mli @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ val functional_induction : bool -> Term.constr -> (Term.constr * Term.constr bindings) option -> - intro_pattern_expr Loc.located option -> + or_and_intro_pattern_expr Loc.located option -> Proof_type.goal Tacmach.sigma -> Proof_type.goal list Evd.sigma |