diff options
author | Matej Kosik <m4tej.kosik@gmail.com> | 2015-11-05 16:21:56 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Hugo Herbelin <Hugo.Herbelin@inria.fr> | 2015-12-10 09:35:16 +0100 |
commit | d139d73949ee7ab6c070cac98f1af23431967ab0 (patch) | |
tree | 73bf730fb521a9ddad9b3be64f5ba69df73f3744 /doc | |
parent | 4e8a02a38635cb33ecee78736a2661d169d52046 (diff) |
ENH: a forward reference to a place where the concept of "allowed elimination sorts" is actually used
Diffstat (limited to 'doc')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/refman/RefMan-cic.tex | 1 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/refman/RefMan-cic.tex b/doc/refman/RefMan-cic.tex index c54481e87..49e164931 100644 --- a/doc/refman/RefMan-cic.tex +++ b/doc/refman/RefMan-cic.tex @@ -1376,6 +1376,7 @@ proving a property $\lb a x \mto P$ of type $B$. % QUESTION: Is it necessary to explain the meaning of [I:A|B] in such a complicated way? % Couldn't we just say that: "relation [I:A|B] defines which types can we choose as 'result types' % with respect to the type of the matched object". +We use this concept to formulate the hypothesis of the typing rule for the match-construct. The case of inductive definitions in sorts \Set\ or \Type{} is simple. There is no restriction on the sort of the predicate to be |