diff options
author | 2015-12-03 15:08:51 +0100 | |
---|---|---|
committer | 2015-12-03 15:13:02 +0100 | |
commit | 06a30c78c6148e8286c0904368bcc0f7c5af2c81 (patch) | |
tree | 8581b27825cd3a6b5e1ced6061004f9b9ddd0f11 /doc/refman | |
parent | f5a752261f210e9c5ecbbbf54886904f0856975a (diff) | |
parent | 6316e8b380a9942cd587f250eb4a69668e52019e (diff) |
Merge branch 'v8.5'
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/refman')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/refman/RefMan-ext.tex | 4 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | doc/refman/RefMan-tac.tex | 11 |
2 files changed, 9 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/doc/refman/RefMan-ext.tex b/doc/refman/RefMan-ext.tex index b77118e1f..80e12898f 100644 --- a/doc/refman/RefMan-ext.tex +++ b/doc/refman/RefMan-ext.tex @@ -1998,7 +1998,7 @@ variables, use \end{quote} \subsection{Solving existential variables using tactics} -\ttindex{\textdollar( \ldots )\textdollar} +\ttindex{ltac:( \ldots )} \def\expr{\textrm{\textsl{tacexpr}}} @@ -2012,7 +2012,7 @@ binding as well as those introduced by tactic binding. The expression {\expr} can be any tactic expression as described at section~\ref{TacticLanguage}. \begin{coq_example*} -Definition foo (x : nat) : nat := $( exact x )$. +Definition foo (x : nat) : nat := ltac:(exact x). \end{coq_example*} This construction is useful when one wants to define complicated terms using diff --git a/doc/refman/RefMan-tac.tex b/doc/refman/RefMan-tac.tex index fae0bd5e5..b855a0eac 100644 --- a/doc/refman/RefMan-tac.tex +++ b/doc/refman/RefMan-tac.tex @@ -828,7 +828,9 @@ either: \item a pattern for decomposing an equality: {\tt [= $p_1$ \dots\ $p_n$]} \item the rewriting orientations: {\tt ->} or {\tt <-} \end{itemize} - \item the on-the-fly application of a lemma: $p${\tt /{\term}} + \item the on-the-fly application of lemmas: $p${\tt /{\term$_1$}} + \ldots {\tt /{\term$_n$}} where $p$ itself is not an on-the-fly + application of lemmas pattern \end{itemize} \item the wildcard: {\tt \_} \end{itemize} @@ -896,9 +898,10 @@ introduction pattern~$p$: itself is erased; if the term to substitute is a variable, it is substituted also in the context of goal and the variable is removed too; -\item introduction over a pattern $p${\tt /{\term}} first applies - {\term} on the hypothesis to be introduced (as in {\tt apply - }{\term} {\tt in}), prior to the application of the introduction +\item introduction over a pattern $p${\tt /{\term$_1$}} \ldots {\tt + /{\term$_n$}} first applies {\term$_1$},\ldots, {\term$_n$} on the + hypothesis to be introduced (as in {\tt apply }{\term}$_1$, \ldots, + {\term}$_n$ {\tt in}), prior to the application of the introduction pattern $p$; \item introduction on the wildcard depends on whether the product is dependent or not: in the non-dependent case, it erases the |