diff options
author | Théo Zimmermann <theo.zimmermann@univ-paris-diderot.fr> | 2018-05-24 16:43:27 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Théo Zimmermann <theo.zimmermann@univ-paris-diderot.fr> | 2018-05-24 17:55:32 +0200 |
commit | bc5d403411f746831b99e4fd87b5eba1ded0560a (patch) | |
tree | b52038da82d4d52e1f99a5fdec8089f49c4f561e /dev | |
parent | 87af4f4c41878bee5d02ab8560898c56611baa4c (diff) |
Complete rewrite of the documentation of overlays after Jim's additional comments.
[ci skip]
Diffstat (limited to 'dev')
-rw-r--r-- | dev/ci/README.md | 35 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | dev/ci/user-overlays/README.md | 25 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | dev/doc/MERGING.md | 49 |
3 files changed, 62 insertions, 47 deletions
diff --git a/dev/ci/README.md b/dev/ci/README.md index ed3442e0d..697a160ca 100644 --- a/dev/ci/README.md +++ b/dev/ci/README.md @@ -107,19 +107,32 @@ there are some. You can also run one CI target locally (using `make ci-somedev`). -Whenever your PR breaks tested developments, you should either adapt it -so that it doesn't, or provide a branch fixing these developments (or at -least work with the author of the development / other Coq developers to -prepare these fixes). Then, add an overlay in -[`dev/ci/user-overlays`](/dev/ci/user-overlays) (see the README there) -as part of your PR. - -The process to merge your PR is then to submit PRs to the external -development repositories, merge the latter first (if the fixes are -backward-compatible), and merge the PR on Coq then. - See also [`test-suite/README.md`](/test-suite/README.md) for information about adding new tests to the test-suite. +### Breaking changes + +When your PR breaks an external project we test in our CI, you must prepare a +patch (or ask someone to prepare a patch) to fix the project: + +1. Fork the external project, create a new branch, push a commit adapting + the project to your changes. +2. Test your pull request with your adapted version of the external project by + adding an overlay file to your pull request (cf. + [`dev/ci/user-overlays/README.md`](/dev/ci/user-overlays/README.md)). +3. Fixes to external libraries (pure Coq projects) *must* be backward + compatible (i.e. they should also work with the development version of Coq, + and the latest stable version). This will allow you to open a PR on the + external project repository to have your changes merged *before* your PR on + Coq can be integrated. + + On the other hand, patches to plugins (projects linking to the Coq ML API) + can very rarely be made backward compatible and plugins we test will + generally have a dedicated branch per Coq version. + You can still open a pull request but the merging will be requested by the + developer who merges the PR on Coq. There are plans to improve this, cf. + [#6724](https://github.com/coq/coq/issues/6724). + +Moreover your PR must absolutely update the [`CHANGES`](/CHANGES) file. Advanced GitLab CI information ------------------------------ diff --git a/dev/ci/user-overlays/README.md b/dev/ci/user-overlays/README.md index 8cbe8fc33..aec2dfe0a 100644 --- a/dev/ci/user-overlays/README.md +++ b/dev/ci/user-overlays/README.md @@ -1,18 +1,17 @@ # Add overlays for your pull requests in this directory -When your pull request breaks an external development we test in our CI, you -must prepare a patch (or ask someone to prepare a patch) to fix this development. -Backward compatible patches are to be preferred, especially on libraries (it is -harder to make backward compatible patches for plugins). - -Once you have a patched version, you can add an overlay to your pull request: -this is a file which defines where to look for the patched version so that -testing is possible. It changes the value of some variables from -[`ci-basic-overlay.sh`](/dev/ci/ci-basic-overlay.sh) (generally both the -`_CI_BRANCH` and the `_CI_GITURL` variables of a given development at once). - -The file contains very simple logic to test the pull request number or branch -name and apply it only in this case. +When your pull request breaks an external project we test in our CI and you +have prepared a branch with the fix, you can add an "overlay" to your pull +request to test it with the adapted version of the external project. + +An overlay is a file which defines where to look for the patched version so that +testing is possible. It redefines some variables from +[`ci-basic-overlay.sh`](/dev/ci/ci-basic-overlay.sh): +give the name of your branch using a `_CI_BRANCH` variable and the location of +your fork using a `_CI_GITURL` variable. + +Moreover, the file contains very simple logic to test the pull request number +or branch name and apply it only in this case. The name of your overlay file should start with a five-digit pull request number, followed by a dash, anything (for instance your GitHub nickname diff --git a/dev/doc/MERGING.md b/dev/doc/MERGING.md index 14d30517c..65457b63a 100644 --- a/dev/doc/MERGING.md +++ b/dev/doc/MERGING.md @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ # Merging changes in Coq -This document describes how patches (submitted as pull requests -on the `master` branch) should be -merged into the main repository (https://github.com/coq/coq). +This document describes how patches, submitted as pull requests (PRs) on the +`master` branch, should be merged into the main repository +(https://github.com/coq/coq). ## Code owners @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ The [CODEOWNERS](/.github/CODEOWNERS) file describes, for each part of the system, two owners. One is the principal maintainer of the component, the other is the secondary maintainer. -When a pull request is submitted, GitHub will automatically ask the principal -maintainer for a review. If the pull request touches several parts, all the +When a PR is submitted, GitHub will automatically ask the principal +maintainer for a review. If the PR touches several parts, all the corresponding principal maintainers will be asked for a review. Maintainers are never assigned as reviewer on their own PRs. @@ -47,6 +47,27 @@ a `Makefile`, etc), or by applying a systematic refactoring process (global renaming for instance) that has been reviewed globally, the assignee can say in a comment they think a review is not required and proceed with the merge. +### Breaking changes + +If the PR breaks compatibility of some external projects in CI, then fixes to +those external projects should have been prepared (cf. the relevant sub-section +in the [CI README](/dev/ci/README.md#Breaking-changes) and the PR can be tested +with these fixes thanks to ["overlays"](/dev/ci/user-overlays/README.md). + +Moreover the PR must absolutely update the [`CHANGES`](/CHANGES) file. + +If overlays are missing, ask the author to prepare them and label the PR with +the [needs: overlay](https://github.com/coq/coq/labels/needs%3A%20overlay) label. + +When fixes are ready, there are two cases to consider: + +- For patches that are backward compatible (best scenario), you should get the + external project maintainers to integrate them before merging the PR. +- For patches that are not backward compatible (which is often the case when + patching plugins after an update to the Coq API), you can proceed to merge + the PR and then notify the external project maintainers they can merge the + patch. + ## Merging Once all reviewers approved the PR, the assignee is expected to check that CI @@ -89,24 +110,6 @@ DON'T USE the GitHub interface for merging, since it will prevent the automated backport script from operating properly, generates bad commit messages, and a messy history when there are conflicts. -### What to do if the PR has overlays - -If the PR breaks compatibility of some developments in CI, then the author must -have prepared overlays for these developments (see -[`dev/ci/user-overlays/README.md`](/dev/ci/user-overlays/README.md) for -detailed explanations of what this is) -and the PR must absolutely update the `CHANGES` file. - -There are two cases to consider: - -- If the patch is backward compatible (best scenario), then you should get - upstream maintainers to integrate it before merging the PR. -- If the patch is not backward compatible (which is often the case when - patching plugins after an update to the Coq API), then you can proceed to - merge the PR and then notify upstream they can merge the patch. This is a - less preferable scenario because it is probably going to create - spurious CI failures for unrelated PRs. - ### Merge script dependencies The merge script passes option `-S` to `git merge` to ensure merge commits |