aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffhomepage
path: root/contrib
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGravatar corbinea <corbinea@85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7>2003-03-21 14:28:26 +0000
committerGravatar corbinea <corbinea@85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7>2003-03-21 14:28:26 +0000
commitb3e715c1dd3692cc79e8a83e99fdd35c0ffec392 (patch)
tree8722045866b1afb211524ae48f038596fc56e23b /contrib
parent760b14883ba8c4aa5d17cad1f8834683b647d07f (diff)
Fin de la résurrection de Linear.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@3781 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
Diffstat (limited to 'contrib')
-rwxr-xr-xcontrib/linear/ccidpc.ml459
-rwxr-xr-xcontrib/linear/lk_proofs.ml18
2 files changed, 38 insertions, 39 deletions
diff --git a/contrib/linear/ccidpc.ml4 b/contrib/linear/ccidpc.ml4
index 1823b2d48..06b4aaa48 100755
--- a/contrib/linear/ccidpc.ml4
+++ b/contrib/linear/ccidpc.ml4
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ let is_forall_term t=op2bool (match_with_forall_term t)
let constr_of_string s () =
Libnames.constr_of_reference (Nametab.locate (Libnames.qualid_of_string s))
-let id_ex=constr_of_string "Coq.Init.Logic.ex"
+let id_ex=constr_of_string "Logic.ex"
let match_with_exist_term t=
match kind_of_term t with
@@ -75,15 +75,15 @@ let match_with_exist_term t=
if t=id_ex () && (Array.length v)=2 then
match kind_of_term v.(1) with
Lambda(na,a,b)->Some(na,a,b)
- |_->assert false
+ |_->raise Impossible_case
else None
| _->None
let is_exist_term t=op2bool (match_with_exist_term t)
-let id_not=constr_of_string "Coq.Init.Logic.not"
+let id_not=constr_of_string "Logic.not"
-let id_false=constr_of_string "Coq.Init.Logic.False"
+let id_false=constr_of_string "Logic.False"
let match_with_not_term t=
match kind_of_term t with
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ let gen_ident id = make_ident (atompart_of_id id) (incr ctr;Some !ctr)
let gen_name a na =
match (named_hd Environ.empty_env a na) with
(Name id)->gen_ident id
- | Anonymous->assert false
+ | Anonymous->raise Impossible_case
let dpc_of_cci_term lid =
let rec tradrec cciterm =
@@ -141,13 +141,19 @@ let cci_of_dpc_term tradsign sign =
| APP (t::dpcargs) ->
let t' = tradrec t in
Term.applist(t', List.map tradrec dpcargs)
- | _-> assert false
+ | _-> raise Impossible_case
in tradrec
let dpc_of_cci_fmla gls cciterm =
let rec tradrec lid cciterm =
- match match_with_conjunction cciterm with
+ match match_with_exist_term cciterm with
+ Some ((na,a,b)as trp)->
+ let id = gen_name a na in
+ let f=whd_beta (mkApp ((mkLambda trp),[|mkVar id|])) in
+ Exists(id,tradrec (id::lid) f)
+ |_->
+ (match match_with_conjunction cciterm with
Some (_,[a;b])->Conj(tradrec lid a,tradrec lid b)
|_->
(match match_with_disjunction cciterm with
@@ -165,12 +171,6 @@ let dpc_of_cci_fmla gls cciterm =
let f=whd_beta (mkApp ((mkLambda trp),[|mkVar id|])) in
ForAll(id,tradrec (id::lid) f)
|_->
- (match match_with_exist_term cciterm with
- Some ((na,a,b)as trp)->
- let id = gen_name a na in
- let f=whd_beta (mkApp ((mkLambda trp),[|mkVar id|])) in
- Exists(id,tradrec (id::lid) f)
- |_->
let (hd,args) = whd_betaiota_stack cciterm in
let dpcargs = List.map (dpc_of_cci_term lid) args
in (match kind_of_term hd with
@@ -214,11 +214,11 @@ let forAllE id t gls =
tclTHEN (generalize [mkApp (mkVar id,[|t|])]) intro gls
else tclFAIL 0 gls
-let existE id gls =
+let existE id id2 gls =
let (_,_,t)=lookup_named id (pf_hyps gls) in
if is_exist_term t then
((tclTHEN (simplest_elim (mkVar id))
- (tclDO 2 (dImp None)))) gls
+ (tclTHEN (intro_using id2) (dImp None)))) gls
else tclFAIL 0 gls
let negE id gls =
@@ -230,16 +230,16 @@ let negE id gls =
(*t exist_intro_head = put_pat mmk "ex_intro"*)
let existI t gls =
-(* if is_exist_term (pf_concl gls) then
+ if is_exist_term (pf_concl gls) then
split (Rawterm.ImplicitBindings [t]) gls
- else tclFAIL 0 gls *)
-
+ else tclFAIL 0 gls
+ (*
let (wc,kONT) = Evar_refiner.startWalk gls in
let clause = mk_clenv_hnf_constr_type_of wc (pf_concl gls) in
let clause' = clenv_constrain_missing_args [t] clause
in res_pf kONT clause' gls
-
+ *)
let rec alpha_fmla bl1 bl2 p_0 p_1 =
match p_0,p_1 with
@@ -273,16 +273,15 @@ let first_pred p =
in firstrec
-let find_fmla_left (kspine,f) (jspine,gl) =
- let ids = pf_ids_of_hyps gl
- and sign= pf_hyps gl in
- first_pred
- (fun id ->
- let (_,_,t)=lookup_named id sign in
- ( try alpha_eq (kspine,f)
+let find_fmla_left (kspine,f) (jspine,gl) =
+ let sign= pf_hyps gl in
+ let (id,_,_)=first_pred
+ (fun (id,_,t) ->
+ ( try
+ alpha_eq (kspine,f)
(jspine,dpc_of_cci_fmla gl t)
with _ -> false)
- ) ids
+ ) sign in id
let onNthClause tac n gls =
@@ -299,7 +298,7 @@ let rec tradpf kspine jspine dpcpf gls =
Proof2(_,_,Axiom2 f) ->
let id = find_fmla_left (kspine,f) (jspine,gls)
- in exact_no_check (mkVar id) gls
+ in (*exact_check (mkVar id)*)assumption gls
| Proof2(_,_,LWeakening2(_,pf)) -> trad kspine jspine pf gls
@@ -347,10 +346,10 @@ let rec tradpf kspine jspine dpcpf gls =
| Proof2(_,_,LExists2(kid,f,pf)) ->
let id = find_fmla_left (kspine,Exists(kid,f)) (jspine,gls)
- in ((tclTHEN (existE id)
+ in ((tclTHEN (existE id kid)
((onNthClause (function (Some jid) ->
trad (kid::kspine) (jid::jspine) pf
- | None-> assert false)
+ | None-> raise Impossible_case)
(-2))))) gls
| Proof2(_,_,RExists2(kid,kterm,f,pf)) ->
diff --git a/contrib/linear/lk_proofs.ml b/contrib/linear/lk_proofs.ml
index 1360615a4..5ca3338c5 100755
--- a/contrib/linear/lk_proofs.ml
+++ b/contrib/linear/lk_proofs.ml
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ let sep_at at llt (lmu,_) =
then ((Po a)::l1,l2)
else (l1,(Po a)::l2)
| [] -> ([],[])
- | _->assert false
+ | _->raise Impossible_case
in sep_at_rec at
let sep_nat nat llt (lmu,_) =
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ let sep_nat nat llt (lmu,_) =
then ((No a)::l1,l2)
else (l1,(No a)::l2)
| [] -> ([],[])
- | _->assert false
+ | _->raise Impossible_case
in sep_nat_rec nat
let sep_neg neg llt (lmu,_) =
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ let sep_path (at,nat,conj,rneg,lneg) p =
[x] -> x
| ((Po(Conj _),_,_) as c::_) -> c (** on recherche d'abord A/\B **)
| _::ll -> find_X0 ll
- | _->assert false
+ | _->raise Impossible_case
in let (x0,l1,l2) = if all_X0=[] then
failwith "Can't find X0 in sep_path ! (impossible case)"
else find_X0 all_X0
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ let sep_path (at,nat,conj,rneg,lneg) p =
and (nat1,nat2) = sep_nat nat litS1 p
in let neg = lneg @ (List.map (function
(Po (Neg f)) -> (No f)
- | _->assert false) rneg)
+ | _->raise Impossible_case) rneg)
in let (neg1,neg2) = sep_neg neg litS1 p
in let lit_at1 = List.map proj at1
and lit_nat1 = List.map proj nat1
@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ let rec rneg_case pr = function
and sq2' = (Neg f)::sq2
in (Proof2(sq1',sq2',RNeg2(f,pr1)))
| [] -> pr
- | _->assert false
+ | _->raise Impossible_case
let lneg_case ((Proof2(sq1,sq2,_)) as pr) =function
@@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ let lneg_case ((Proof2(sq1,sq2,_)) as pr) =function
let sq1' = (Neg f)::sq1
and sq2' = substract sq2 [f]
in (Proof2(sq1',sq2',LNeg2(f,pr)))
- | _->assert false
+ | _->raise Impossible_case
let find_lneg lneg =
let rec is_negneg = function
@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ and cases (at,nat,conj,rneg,lneg) p =
if rneg<>[] then
let s = at@nat@lneg@(List.map (function
(Po (Neg f)) -> (No f)
- | _->assert false) rneg)
+ | _->raise Impossible_case) rneg)
in let pr = proof_of_path s p
in rneg_case pr rneg
else
@@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ and cases (at,nat,conj,rneg,lneg) p =
let s = at@nat@(substract lneg [g])@[Po f] in
let pr = proof_of_path s p in
lneg_case pr g
- |_->assert false
+ |_->raise Impossible_case
(* pi_formula : separated formula -> formula
@@ -733,7 +733,7 @@ let int_quant f u pr =
and fr_var = free_var_formula f
in let un_var = List.map (function
(Universal(id,_,_)) -> id
- | _ ->assert false) un_qt
+ | _ ->raise Impossible_case) un_qt
in let sk_var = un_var @ fr_var
in let u0 = unher_unif sk_var u
in let pr0 = pi_proof pr