diff options
author | letouzey <letouzey@85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7> | 2011-04-03 11:23:31 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | letouzey <letouzey@85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7> | 2011-04-03 11:23:31 +0000 |
commit | 5681594c83c2ba9a2c0e21983cac0f161ff95f02 (patch) | |
tree | ea458a8321f71b3e2fba5d67cfc3f79866241d48 /checker/mod_checking.ml | |
parent | da1e32cbdc78050ea2e89eee896ba2b40db1b5dd (diff) |
Lazy loading of opaque proofs: fast as -dont-load-proofs without its drawbacks
The recent experiment with -dont-load-proofs in the stdlib showed that
this options isn't fully safe: some axioms were generated (Include ?
functor application ? This is still to be fully understood).
Instead, I've implemented an idea of Yann: only load opaque proofs when
we need them. This is almost as fast as -dont-load-proofs (on the stdlib,
we're now 15% faster than before instead of 20% faster with -dont-load-proofs),
but fully compatible with Coq standard behavior.
Technically, the const_body field of Declarations.constant_body now regroup
const_body + const_opaque + const_inline in a ternary type. It is now either:
- Undef : an axiom or parameter, with an inline info
- Def : a transparent definition, with a constr_substituted
- OpaqueDef : an opaque definition, with a lazy constr_substitued
Accessing the lazy constr of an OpaqueDef might trigger the read on disk of
the final section of a .vo, where opaque proofs are located.
Some functions (body_of_constant, is_opaque, constant_has_body) emulate
the behavior of the old fields. The rest of Coq (including the checker)
has been adapted accordingly, either via direct access to the new const_body
or via these new functions. Many places look nicer now (ok, subjective notion).
There are now three options: -lazy-load-proofs (default), -force-load-proofs
(earlier semantics), -dont-load-proofs. Note that -outputstate now implies
-force-load-proofs (otherwise the marshaling fails on some delayed lazy).
On the way, I fixed what looked like a bug : a module type
(T with Definition x := c) was accepted even when x in T was opaque.
I also tried to clarify Subtyping.check_constant.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@13952 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
Diffstat (limited to 'checker/mod_checking.ml')
-rw-r--r-- | checker/mod_checking.ml | 21 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/checker/mod_checking.ml b/checker/mod_checking.ml index 30149331e..e6582e918 100644 --- a/checker/mod_checking.ml +++ b/checker/mod_checking.ml @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ let check_constant_declaration env kn cb = let ty, cu = refresh_arity ty in let envty = add_constraints cu env' in let _ = infer_type envty ty in - (match cb.const_body with + (match body_of_constant cb with | Some bd -> let j = infer env' (force_constr bd) in conv_leq envty j ty @@ -110,14 +110,17 @@ let check_definition_sub env cb1 cb2 = let typ1 = Typeops.type_of_constant_type env cb1.const_type in let typ2 = Typeops.type_of_constant_type env cb2.const_type in check_type env typ1 typ2; - (match cb2 with - | {const_body=Some lc2;const_opaque=false} -> - let c2 = force_constr lc2 in - let c1 = match cb1.const_body with - | Some lc1 -> force_constr lc1 - | None -> assert false in - Reduction.conv env c1 c2 - | _ -> ()) + (match cb2.const_body with + | Undef _ -> () + | Def lc2 -> + (match cb1.const_body with + | Def lc1 -> + let c1 = force_constr lc1 in + let c2 = force_constr lc2 in + Reduction.conv env c1 c2 + (* Coq only places transparent cb in With_definition_body *) + | _ -> assert false) + | _ -> ()) (* Pierre L: shouldn't this case raise an error ? *) let lookup_modtype mp env = try Environ.lookup_modtype mp env |