aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffhomepage
path: root/absl
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'absl')
-rw-r--r--absl/base/exception_safety_testing_test.cc60
-rw-r--r--absl/base/internal/exception_safety_testing.h138
-rw-r--r--absl/container/fixed_array_exception_safety_test.cc2
-rw-r--r--absl/debugging/stacktrace.cc4
-rw-r--r--absl/memory/memory_exception_safety_test.cc2
-rw-r--r--absl/strings/internal/str_format/parser.cc75
-rw-r--r--absl/strings/internal/str_format/parser_test.cc16
-rw-r--r--absl/strings/string_view.h29
-rw-r--r--absl/synchronization/internal/graphcycles.cc6
-rw-r--r--absl/time/time.h3
-rw-r--r--absl/types/any_exception_safety_test.cc6
-rw-r--r--absl/types/internal/variant.h7
-rw-r--r--absl/types/optional_exception_safety_test.cc24
-rw-r--r--absl/types/variant_exception_safety_test.cc94
14 files changed, 247 insertions, 219 deletions
diff --git a/absl/base/exception_safety_testing_test.cc b/absl/base/exception_safety_testing_test.cc
index 9141e39..106bc34 100644
--- a/absl/base/exception_safety_testing_test.cc
+++ b/absl/base/exception_safety_testing_test.cc
@@ -548,21 +548,21 @@ TEST(ExceptionSafetyTesterTest, IncompleteTypesAreNotTestable) {
// Test that providing operation and inveriants still does not allow for the
// the invocation of .Test() and .Test(op) because it lacks a factory
auto without_fac =
- testing::MakeExceptionSafetyTester().WithOperation(op).WithInvariants(
+ testing::MakeExceptionSafetyTester().WithOperation(op).WithContracts(
inv, testing::strong_guarantee);
EXPECT_FALSE(HasNullaryTest(without_fac));
EXPECT_FALSE(HasUnaryTest(without_fac));
- // Test that providing invariants and factory allows the invocation of
+ // Test that providing contracts and factory allows the invocation of
// .Test(op) but does not allow for .Test() because it lacks an operation
auto without_op = testing::MakeExceptionSafetyTester()
- .WithInvariants(inv, testing::strong_guarantee)
+ .WithContracts(inv, testing::strong_guarantee)
.WithFactory(fac);
EXPECT_FALSE(HasNullaryTest(without_op));
EXPECT_TRUE(HasUnaryTest(without_op));
// Test that providing operation and factory still does not allow for the
- // the invocation of .Test() and .Test(op) because it lacks invariants
+ // the invocation of .Test() and .Test(op) because it lacks contracts
auto without_inv =
testing::MakeExceptionSafetyTester().WithOperation(op).WithFactory(fac);
EXPECT_FALSE(HasNullaryTest(without_inv));
@@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ std::unique_ptr<ExampleStruct> ExampleFunctionFactory() {
void ExampleFunctionOperation(ExampleStruct*) {}
-testing::AssertionResult ExampleFunctionInvariant(ExampleStruct*) {
+testing::AssertionResult ExampleFunctionContract(ExampleStruct*) {
return testing::AssertionSuccess();
}
@@ -593,16 +593,16 @@ struct {
struct {
testing::AssertionResult operator()(ExampleStruct* example_struct) const {
- return ExampleFunctionInvariant(example_struct);
+ return ExampleFunctionContract(example_struct);
}
-} example_struct_invariant;
+} example_struct_contract;
auto example_lambda_factory = []() { return ExampleFunctionFactory(); };
auto example_lambda_operation = [](ExampleStruct*) {};
-auto example_lambda_invariant = [](ExampleStruct* example_struct) {
- return ExampleFunctionInvariant(example_struct);
+auto example_lambda_contract = [](ExampleStruct* example_struct) {
+ return ExampleFunctionContract(example_struct);
};
// Testing that function references, pointers, structs with operator() and
@@ -612,28 +612,28 @@ TEST(ExceptionSafetyTesterTest, MixedFunctionTypes) {
EXPECT_TRUE(testing::MakeExceptionSafetyTester()
.WithFactory(ExampleFunctionFactory)
.WithOperation(ExampleFunctionOperation)
- .WithInvariants(ExampleFunctionInvariant)
+ .WithContracts(ExampleFunctionContract)
.Test());
// function pointer
EXPECT_TRUE(testing::MakeExceptionSafetyTester()
.WithFactory(&ExampleFunctionFactory)
.WithOperation(&ExampleFunctionOperation)
- .WithInvariants(&ExampleFunctionInvariant)
+ .WithContracts(&ExampleFunctionContract)
.Test());
// struct
EXPECT_TRUE(testing::MakeExceptionSafetyTester()
.WithFactory(example_struct_factory)
.WithOperation(example_struct_operation)
- .WithInvariants(example_struct_invariant)
+ .WithContracts(example_struct_contract)
.Test());
// lambda
EXPECT_TRUE(testing::MakeExceptionSafetyTester()
.WithFactory(example_lambda_factory)
.WithOperation(example_lambda_operation)
- .WithInvariants(example_lambda_invariant)
+ .WithContracts(example_lambda_contract)
.Test());
}
@@ -658,9 +658,9 @@ struct {
} invoker;
auto tester =
- testing::MakeExceptionSafetyTester().WithOperation(invoker).WithInvariants(
+ testing::MakeExceptionSafetyTester().WithOperation(invoker).WithContracts(
CheckNonNegativeInvariants);
-auto strong_tester = tester.WithInvariants(testing::strong_guarantee);
+auto strong_tester = tester.WithContracts(testing::strong_guarantee);
struct FailsBasicGuarantee : public NonNegative {
void operator()() {
@@ -690,7 +690,7 @@ TEST(ExceptionCheckTest, StrongGuaranteeFailure) {
EXPECT_FALSE(strong_tester.WithInitialValue(FollowsBasicGuarantee{}).Test());
}
-struct BasicGuaranteeWithExtraInvariants : public NonNegative {
+struct BasicGuaranteeWithExtraContracts : public NonNegative {
// After operator(), i is incremented. If operator() throws, i is set to 9999
void operator()() {
int old_i = i;
@@ -701,21 +701,21 @@ struct BasicGuaranteeWithExtraInvariants : public NonNegative {
static constexpr int kExceptionSentinel = 9999;
};
-constexpr int BasicGuaranteeWithExtraInvariants::kExceptionSentinel;
+constexpr int BasicGuaranteeWithExtraContracts::kExceptionSentinel;
-TEST(ExceptionCheckTest, BasicGuaranteeWithExtraInvariants) {
+TEST(ExceptionCheckTest, BasicGuaranteeWithExtraContracts) {
auto tester_with_val =
- tester.WithInitialValue(BasicGuaranteeWithExtraInvariants{});
+ tester.WithInitialValue(BasicGuaranteeWithExtraContracts{});
EXPECT_TRUE(tester_with_val.Test());
EXPECT_TRUE(
tester_with_val
- .WithInvariants([](BasicGuaranteeWithExtraInvariants* o) {
- if (o->i == BasicGuaranteeWithExtraInvariants::kExceptionSentinel) {
+ .WithContracts([](BasicGuaranteeWithExtraContracts* o) {
+ if (o->i == BasicGuaranteeWithExtraContracts::kExceptionSentinel) {
return testing::AssertionSuccess();
}
return testing::AssertionFailure()
<< "i should be "
- << BasicGuaranteeWithExtraInvariants::kExceptionSentinel
+ << BasicGuaranteeWithExtraContracts::kExceptionSentinel
<< ", but is " << o->i;
})
.Test());
@@ -740,7 +740,7 @@ struct HasReset : public NonNegative {
void reset() { i = 0; }
};
-testing::AssertionResult CheckHasResetInvariants(HasReset* h) {
+testing::AssertionResult CheckHasResetContracts(HasReset* h) {
h->reset();
return testing::AssertionResult(h->i == 0);
}
@@ -759,14 +759,14 @@ TEST(ExceptionCheckTest, ModifyingChecker) {
};
EXPECT_FALSE(tester.WithInitialValue(FollowsBasicGuarantee{})
- .WithInvariants(set_to_1000, is_1000)
+ .WithContracts(set_to_1000, is_1000)
.Test());
EXPECT_TRUE(strong_tester.WithInitialValue(FollowsStrongGuarantee{})
- .WithInvariants(increment)
+ .WithContracts(increment)
.Test());
EXPECT_TRUE(testing::MakeExceptionSafetyTester()
.WithInitialValue(HasReset{})
- .WithInvariants(CheckHasResetInvariants)
+ .WithContracts(CheckHasResetContracts)
.Test(invoker));
}
@@ -799,7 +799,7 @@ TEST(ExceptionCheckTest, NonEqualityComparable) {
return testing::AssertionResult(nec->i == NonEqualityComparable().i);
};
auto strong_nec_tester = tester.WithInitialValue(NonEqualityComparable{})
- .WithInvariants(nec_is_strong);
+ .WithContracts(nec_is_strong);
EXPECT_TRUE(strong_nec_tester.Test());
EXPECT_FALSE(strong_nec_tester.Test(
@@ -833,14 +833,14 @@ struct {
testing::AssertionResult operator()(ExhaustivenessTester<T>*) const {
return testing::AssertionSuccess();
}
-} CheckExhaustivenessTesterInvariants;
+} CheckExhaustivenessTesterContracts;
template <typename T>
unsigned char ExhaustivenessTester<T>::successes = 0;
TEST(ExceptionCheckTest, Exhaustiveness) {
auto exhaust_tester = testing::MakeExceptionSafetyTester()
- .WithInvariants(CheckExhaustivenessTesterInvariants)
+ .WithContracts(CheckExhaustivenessTesterContracts)
.WithOperation(invoker);
EXPECT_TRUE(
@@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ TEST(ExceptionCheckTest, Exhaustiveness) {
EXPECT_TRUE(
exhaust_tester.WithInitialValue(ExhaustivenessTester<ThrowingValue<>>{})
- .WithInvariants(testing::strong_guarantee)
+ .WithContracts(testing::strong_guarantee)
.Test());
EXPECT_EQ(ExhaustivenessTester<ThrowingValue<>>::successes, 0xF);
}
diff --git a/absl/base/internal/exception_safety_testing.h b/absl/base/internal/exception_safety_testing.h
index de4f0e2..5665a1b 100644
--- a/absl/base/internal/exception_safety_testing.h
+++ b/absl/base/internal/exception_safety_testing.h
@@ -191,19 +191,19 @@ class TrackedObject {
~TrackedObject() noexcept { ConstructorTracker::ObjectDestructed(this); }
};
-template <typename Factory, typename Operation, typename Invariant>
-absl::optional<testing::AssertionResult> TestSingleInvariantAtCountdownImpl(
+template <typename Factory, typename Operation, typename Contract>
+absl::optional<testing::AssertionResult> TestSingleContractAtCountdownImpl(
const Factory& factory, const Operation& operation, int count,
- const Invariant& invariant) {
+ const Contract& contract) {
auto t_ptr = factory();
absl::optional<testing::AssertionResult> current_res;
SetCountdown(count);
try {
operation(t_ptr.get());
} catch (const exceptions_internal::TestException& e) {
- current_res.emplace(invariant(t_ptr.get()));
+ current_res.emplace(contract(t_ptr.get()));
if (!current_res.value()) {
- *current_res << e.what() << " failed invariant check";
+ *current_res << e.what() << " failed contract check";
}
}
UnsetCountdown();
@@ -211,22 +211,22 @@ absl::optional<testing::AssertionResult> TestSingleInvariantAtCountdownImpl(
}
template <typename Factory, typename Operation>
-absl::optional<testing::AssertionResult> TestSingleInvariantAtCountdownImpl(
+absl::optional<testing::AssertionResult> TestSingleContractAtCountdownImpl(
const Factory& factory, const Operation& operation, int count,
StrongGuaranteeTagType) {
using TPtr = typename decltype(factory())::pointer;
auto t_is_strong = [&](TPtr t) { return *t == *factory(); };
- return TestSingleInvariantAtCountdownImpl(factory, operation, count,
- t_is_strong);
+ return TestSingleContractAtCountdownImpl(factory, operation, count,
+ t_is_strong);
}
-template <typename Factory, typename Operation, typename Invariant>
-int TestSingleInvariantAtCountdown(
+template <typename Factory, typename Operation, typename Contract>
+int TestSingleContractAtCountdown(
const Factory& factory, const Operation& operation, int count,
- const Invariant& invariant,
+ const Contract& contract,
absl::optional<testing::AssertionResult>* reduced_res) {
// If reduced_res is empty, it means the current call to
- // TestSingleInvariantAtCountdown(...) is the first test being run so we do
+ // TestSingleContractAtCountdown(...) is the first test being run so we do
// want to run it. Alternatively, if it's not empty (meaning a previous test
// has run) we want to check if it passed. If the previous test did pass, we
// want to contine running tests so we do want to run the current one. If it
@@ -234,22 +234,22 @@ int TestSingleInvariantAtCountdown(
// output. If that's the case, we do not run the current test and instead we
// simply return.
if (!reduced_res->has_value() || reduced_res->value()) {
- *reduced_res = TestSingleInvariantAtCountdownImpl(factory, operation, count,
- invariant);
+ *reduced_res =
+ TestSingleContractAtCountdownImpl(factory, operation, count, contract);
}
return 0;
}
-template <typename Factory, typename Operation, typename... Invariants>
-inline absl::optional<testing::AssertionResult> TestAllInvariantsAtCountdown(
+template <typename Factory, typename Operation, typename... Contracts>
+inline absl::optional<testing::AssertionResult> TestAllContractsAtCountdown(
const Factory& factory, const Operation& operation, int count,
- const Invariants&... invariants) {
+ const Contracts&... contracts) {
absl::optional<testing::AssertionResult> reduced_res;
// Run each checker, short circuiting after the first failure
int dummy[] = {
- 0, (TestSingleInvariantAtCountdown(factory, operation, count, invariants,
- &reduced_res))...};
+ 0, (TestSingleContractAtCountdown(factory, operation, count, contracts,
+ &reduced_res))...};
static_cast<void>(dummy);
return reduced_res;
}
@@ -884,15 +884,15 @@ class DefaultFactory {
T t_;
};
-template <size_t LazyInvariantsCount, typename LazyFactory,
+template <size_t LazyContractsCount, typename LazyFactory,
typename LazyOperation>
using EnableIfTestable = typename absl::enable_if_t<
- LazyInvariantsCount != 0 &&
+ LazyContractsCount != 0 &&
!std::is_same<LazyFactory, UninitializedT>::value &&
!std::is_same<LazyOperation, UninitializedT>::value>;
template <typename Factory = UninitializedT,
- typename Operation = UninitializedT, typename... Invariants>
+ typename Operation = UninitializedT, typename... Contracts>
class ExceptionSafetyTester;
} // namespace exceptions_internal
@@ -903,7 +903,7 @@ namespace exceptions_internal {
/*
* Builds a tester object that tests if performing a operation on a T follows
- * exception safety guarantees. Verification is done via invariant assertion
+ * exception safety guarantees. Verification is done via contract assertion
* callbacks applied to T instances post-throw.
*
* Template parameters for ExceptionSafetyTester:
@@ -921,18 +921,18 @@ namespace exceptions_internal {
* fresh T instance so it's free to modify and destroy the T instances as it
* pleases.
*
- * - Invariants...: The invariant assertion callback objects (passed in via
- * tester.WithInvariants(...)) must be invocable with the signature
+ * - Contracts...: The contract assertion callback objects (passed in via
+ * tester.WithContracts(...)) must be invocable with the signature
* `testing::AssertionResult operator()(T*) const` where T is the type being
- * tested. Invariant assertion callbacks are provided T instances post-throw.
- * They must return testing::AssertionSuccess when the type invariants of the
- * provided T instance hold. If the type invariants of the T instance do not
+ * tested. Contract assertion callbacks are provided T instances post-throw.
+ * They must return testing::AssertionSuccess when the type contracts of the
+ * provided T instance hold. If the type contracts of the T instance do not
* hold, they must return testing::AssertionFailure. Execution order of
- * Invariants... is unspecified. They will each individually get a fresh T
+ * Contracts... is unspecified. They will each individually get a fresh T
* instance so they are free to modify and destroy the T instances as they
* please.
*/
-template <typename Factory, typename Operation, typename... Invariants>
+template <typename Factory, typename Operation, typename... Contracts>
class ExceptionSafetyTester {
public:
/*
@@ -948,7 +948,7 @@ class ExceptionSafetyTester {
* tester.WithFactory(...).
*/
template <typename T>
- ExceptionSafetyTester<DefaultFactory<T>, Operation, Invariants...>
+ ExceptionSafetyTester<DefaultFactory<T>, Operation, Contracts...>
WithInitialValue(const T& t) const {
return WithFactory(DefaultFactory<T>(t));
}
@@ -961,9 +961,9 @@ class ExceptionSafetyTester {
* method tester.WithInitialValue(...).
*/
template <typename NewFactory>
- ExceptionSafetyTester<absl::decay_t<NewFactory>, Operation, Invariants...>
+ ExceptionSafetyTester<absl::decay_t<NewFactory>, Operation, Contracts...>
WithFactory(const NewFactory& new_factory) const {
- return {new_factory, operation_, invariants_};
+ return {new_factory, operation_, contracts_};
}
/*
@@ -972,39 +972,39 @@ class ExceptionSafetyTester {
* tester.
*/
template <typename NewOperation>
- ExceptionSafetyTester<Factory, absl::decay_t<NewOperation>, Invariants...>
+ ExceptionSafetyTester<Factory, absl::decay_t<NewOperation>, Contracts...>
WithOperation(const NewOperation& new_operation) const {
- return {factory_, new_operation, invariants_};
+ return {factory_, new_operation, contracts_};
}
/*
- * Returns a new ExceptionSafetyTester with the provided MoreInvariants...
- * combined with the Invariants... that were already included in the instance
- * on which the method was called. Invariants... cannot be removed or replaced
+ * Returns a new ExceptionSafetyTester with the provided MoreContracts...
+ * combined with the Contracts... that were already included in the instance
+ * on which the method was called. Contracts... cannot be removed or replaced
* once added to an ExceptionSafetyTester instance. A fresh object must be
- * created in order to get an empty Invariants... list.
+ * created in order to get an empty Contracts... list.
*
- * In addition to passing in custom invariant assertion callbacks, this method
+ * In addition to passing in custom contract assertion callbacks, this method
* accepts `testing::strong_guarantee` as an argument which checks T instances
* post-throw against freshly created T instances via operator== to verify
* that any state changes made during the execution of the operation were
* properly rolled back.
*/
- template <typename... MoreInvariants>
- ExceptionSafetyTester<Factory, Operation, Invariants...,
- absl::decay_t<MoreInvariants>...>
- WithInvariants(const MoreInvariants&... more_invariants) const {
- return {factory_, operation_,
- std::tuple_cat(invariants_,
- std::tuple<absl::decay_t<MoreInvariants>...>(
- more_invariants...))};
+ template <typename... MoreContracts>
+ ExceptionSafetyTester<Factory, Operation, Contracts...,
+ absl::decay_t<MoreContracts>...>
+ WithContracts(const MoreContracts&... more_contracts) const {
+ return {
+ factory_, operation_,
+ std::tuple_cat(contracts_, std::tuple<absl::decay_t<MoreContracts>...>(
+ more_contracts...))};
}
/*
* Returns a testing::AssertionResult that is the reduced result of the
* exception safety algorithm. The algorithm short circuits and returns
- * AssertionFailure after the first invariant callback returns an
- * AssertionFailure. Otherwise, if all invariant callbacks return an
+ * AssertionFailure after the first contract callback returns an
+ * AssertionFailure. Otherwise, if all contract callbacks return an
* AssertionSuccess, the reduced result is AssertionSuccess.
*
* The passed-in testable operation will not be saved in a new tester instance
@@ -1013,33 +1013,33 @@ class ExceptionSafetyTester {
*
* Preconditions for tester.Test(const NewOperation& new_operation):
*
- * - May only be called after at least one invariant assertion callback and a
+ * - May only be called after at least one contract assertion callback and a
* factory or initial value have been provided.
*/
template <
typename NewOperation,
- typename = EnableIfTestable<sizeof...(Invariants), Factory, NewOperation>>
+ typename = EnableIfTestable<sizeof...(Contracts), Factory, NewOperation>>
testing::AssertionResult Test(const NewOperation& new_operation) const {
- return TestImpl(new_operation, absl::index_sequence_for<Invariants...>());
+ return TestImpl(new_operation, absl::index_sequence_for<Contracts...>());
}
/*
* Returns a testing::AssertionResult that is the reduced result of the
* exception safety algorithm. The algorithm short circuits and returns
- * AssertionFailure after the first invariant callback returns an
- * AssertionFailure. Otherwise, if all invariant callbacks return an
+ * AssertionFailure after the first contract callback returns an
+ * AssertionFailure. Otherwise, if all contract callbacks return an
* AssertionSuccess, the reduced result is AssertionSuccess.
*
* Preconditions for tester.Test():
*
- * - May only be called after at least one invariant assertion callback, a
+ * - May only be called after at least one contract assertion callback, a
* factory or initial value and a testable operation have been provided.
*/
- template <typename LazyOperation = Operation,
- typename =
- EnableIfTestable<sizeof...(Invariants), Factory, LazyOperation>>
+ template <
+ typename LazyOperation = Operation,
+ typename = EnableIfTestable<sizeof...(Contracts), Factory, LazyOperation>>
testing::AssertionResult Test() const {
- return TestImpl(operation_, absl::index_sequence_for<Invariants...>());
+ return TestImpl(operation_, absl::index_sequence_for<Contracts...>());
}
private:
@@ -1051,8 +1051,8 @@ class ExceptionSafetyTester {
ExceptionSafetyTester() {}
ExceptionSafetyTester(const Factory& f, const Operation& o,
- const std::tuple<Invariants...>& i)
- : factory_(f), operation_(o), invariants_(i) {}
+ const std::tuple<Contracts...>& i)
+ : factory_(f), operation_(o), contracts_(i) {}
template <typename SelectedOperation, size_t... Indices>
testing::AssertionResult TestImpl(const SelectedOperation& selected_operation,
@@ -1064,28 +1064,28 @@ class ExceptionSafetyTester {
// Run the full exception safety test algorithm for the current countdown
auto reduced_res =
- TestAllInvariantsAtCountdown(factory_, selected_operation, count,
- std::get<Indices>(invariants_)...);
- // If there is no value in the optional, no invariants were run because no
+ TestAllContractsAtCountdown(factory_, selected_operation, count,
+ std::get<Indices>(contracts_)...);
+ // If there is no value in the optional, no contracts were run because no
// exception was thrown. This means that the test is complete and the loop
// can exit successfully.
if (!reduced_res.has_value()) {
return testing::AssertionSuccess();
}
- // If the optional is not empty and the value is falsy, an invariant check
+ // If the optional is not empty and the value is falsy, an contract check
// failed so the test must exit to propegate the failure.
if (!reduced_res.value()) {
return reduced_res.value();
}
// If the optional is not empty and the value is not falsy, it means
- // exceptions were thrown but the invariants passed so the test must
+ // exceptions were thrown but the contracts passed so the test must
// continue to run.
}
}
Factory factory_;
Operation operation_;
- std::tuple<Invariants...> invariants_;
+ std::tuple<Contracts...> contracts_;
};
} // namespace exceptions_internal
@@ -1096,7 +1096,7 @@ class ExceptionSafetyTester {
* instances of ExceptionSafetyTester.
*
* In order to test a T for exception safety, a factory for that T, a testable
- * operation, and at least one invariant callback returning an assertion
+ * operation, and at least one contract callback returning an assertion
* result must be applied using the respective methods.
*/
inline exceptions_internal::ExceptionSafetyTester<>
diff --git a/absl/container/fixed_array_exception_safety_test.cc b/absl/container/fixed_array_exception_safety_test.cc
index c123c2a..da63dbf 100644
--- a/absl/container/fixed_array_exception_safety_test.cc
+++ b/absl/container/fixed_array_exception_safety_test.cc
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ testing::AssertionResult ReadMemory(FixedArr* fixed_arr) {
TEST(FixedArrayExceptionSafety, Fill) {
auto test_fill = testing::MakeExceptionSafetyTester()
- .WithInvariants(ReadMemory)
+ .WithContracts(ReadMemory)
.WithOperation([&](FixedArr* fixed_arr_ptr) {
auto thrower =
Thrower(kUpdatedValue, testing::nothrow_ctor);
diff --git a/absl/debugging/stacktrace.cc b/absl/debugging/stacktrace.cc
index 61fee61..463fad2 100644
--- a/absl/debugging/stacktrace.cc
+++ b/absl/debugging/stacktrace.cc
@@ -80,11 +80,13 @@ ABSL_ATTRIBUTE_ALWAYS_INLINE inline int Unwind(void** result, int* sizes,
} // anonymous namespace
+ABSL_ATTRIBUTE_NOINLINE
int GetStackFrames(void** result, int* sizes, int max_depth, int skip_count) {
return Unwind<true, false>(result, sizes, max_depth, skip_count, nullptr,
nullptr);
}
+ABSL_ATTRIBUTE_NOINLINE
int GetStackFramesWithContext(void** result, int* sizes, int max_depth,
int skip_count, const void* uc,
int* min_dropped_frames) {
@@ -92,11 +94,13 @@ int GetStackFramesWithContext(void** result, int* sizes, int max_depth,
min_dropped_frames);
}
+ABSL_ATTRIBUTE_NOINLINE
int GetStackTrace(void** result, int max_depth, int skip_count) {
return Unwind<false, false>(result, nullptr, max_depth, skip_count, nullptr,
nullptr);
}
+ABSL_ATTRIBUTE_NOINLINE
int GetStackTraceWithContext(void** result, int max_depth, int skip_count,
const void* uc, int* min_dropped_frames) {
return Unwind<false, true>(result, nullptr, max_depth, skip_count, uc,
diff --git a/absl/memory/memory_exception_safety_test.cc b/absl/memory/memory_exception_safety_test.cc
index d1f6e84..00d2b19 100644
--- a/absl/memory/memory_exception_safety_test.cc
+++ b/absl/memory/memory_exception_safety_test.cc
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ TEST(MakeUnique, CheckForLeaks) {
.WithInitialValue(Thrower(kValue))
// Ensures make_unique does not modify the input. The real
// test, though, is ConstructorTracker checking for leaks.
- .WithInvariants(testing::strong_guarantee);
+ .WithContracts(testing::strong_guarantee);
EXPECT_TRUE(tester.Test([](Thrower* thrower) {
static_cast<void>(absl::make_unique<Thrower>(*thrower));
diff --git a/absl/strings/internal/str_format/parser.cc b/absl/strings/internal/str_format/parser.cc
index c3e16fc..5e3d0d0 100644
--- a/absl/strings/internal/str_format/parser.cc
+++ b/absl/strings/internal/str_format/parser.cc
@@ -84,16 +84,24 @@ bool ConsumeConversion(string_view *src, UnboundConversion *conv,
const char *pos = src->data();
const char *const end = pos + src->size();
char c;
- // Read the next char into `c` and update `pos`. Reads '\0' if at end.
- const auto get_char = [&] { c = pos == end ? '\0' : *pos++; };
+ // Read the next char into `c` and update `pos`. Returns false if there are
+ // no more chars to read.
+#define ABSL_FORMAT_PARSER_INTERNAL_GET_CHAR() \
+ do { \
+ if (ABSL_PREDICT_FALSE(pos == end)) return false; \
+ c = *pos++; \
+ } while (0)
const auto parse_digits = [&] {
int digits = c - '0';
- // We do not want to overflow `digits` so we consume at most digits10-1
+ // We do not want to overflow `digits` so we consume at most digits10
// digits. If there are more digits the parsing will fail later on when the
// digit doesn't match the expected characters.
- int num_digits = std::numeric_limits<int>::digits10 - 2;
- for (get_char(); num_digits && std::isdigit(c); get_char()) {
+ int num_digits = std::numeric_limits<int>::digits10;
+ for (;;) {
+ if (ABSL_PREDICT_FALSE(pos == end || !num_digits)) break;
+ c = *pos++;
+ if (!std::isdigit(c)) break;
--num_digits;
digits = 10 * digits + c - '0';
}
@@ -101,14 +109,14 @@ bool ConsumeConversion(string_view *src, UnboundConversion *conv,
};
if (is_positional) {
- get_char();
- if (c < '1' || c > '9') return false;
+ ABSL_FORMAT_PARSER_INTERNAL_GET_CHAR();
+ if (ABSL_PREDICT_FALSE(c < '1' || c > '9')) return false;
conv->arg_position = parse_digits();
assert(conv->arg_position > 0);
- if (c != '$') return false;
+ if (ABSL_PREDICT_FALSE(c != '$')) return false;
}
- get_char();
+ ABSL_FORMAT_PARSER_INTERNAL_GET_CHAR();
// We should start with the basic flag on.
assert(conv->flags.basic);
@@ -119,32 +127,39 @@ bool ConsumeConversion(string_view *src, UnboundConversion *conv,
if (c < 'A') {
conv->flags.basic = false;
- for (; c <= '0'; get_char()) {
+ for (; c <= '0';) {
+ // FIXME: We might be able to speed this up reusing the kIds lookup table
+ // from above.
+ // It might require changing Flags to be a plain integer where we can |= a
+ // value.
switch (c) {
case '-':
conv->flags.left = true;
- continue;
+ break;
case '+':
conv->flags.show_pos = true;
- continue;
+ break;
case ' ':
conv->flags.sign_col = true;
- continue;
+ break;
case '#':
conv->flags.alt = true;
- continue;
+ break;
case '0':
conv->flags.zero = true;
- continue;
+ break;
+ default:
+ goto flags_done;
}
- break;
+ ABSL_FORMAT_PARSER_INTERNAL_GET_CHAR();
}
+flags_done:
if (c <= '9') {
if (c >= '0') {
int maybe_width = parse_digits();
if (!is_positional && c == '$') {
- if (*next_arg != 0) return false;
+ if (ABSL_PREDICT_FALSE(*next_arg != 0)) return false;
// Positional conversion.
*next_arg = -1;
conv->flags = Flags();
@@ -153,12 +168,12 @@ bool ConsumeConversion(string_view *src, UnboundConversion *conv,
}
conv->width.set_value(maybe_width);
} else if (c == '*') {
- get_char();
+ ABSL_FORMAT_PARSER_INTERNAL_GET_CHAR();
if (is_positional) {
- if (c < '1' || c > '9') return false;
+ if (ABSL_PREDICT_FALSE(c < '1' || c > '9')) return false;
conv->width.set_from_arg(parse_digits());
- if (c != '$') return false;
- get_char();
+ if (ABSL_PREDICT_FALSE(c != '$')) return false;
+ ABSL_FORMAT_PARSER_INTERNAL_GET_CHAR();
} else {
conv->width.set_from_arg(++*next_arg);
}
@@ -166,16 +181,16 @@ bool ConsumeConversion(string_view *src, UnboundConversion *conv,
}
if (c == '.') {
- get_char();
+ ABSL_FORMAT_PARSER_INTERNAL_GET_CHAR();
if (std::isdigit(c)) {
conv->precision.set_value(parse_digits());
} else if (c == '*') {
- get_char();
+ ABSL_FORMAT_PARSER_INTERNAL_GET_CHAR();
if (is_positional) {
- if (c < '1' || c > '9') return false;
+ if (ABSL_PREDICT_FALSE(c < '1' || c > '9')) return false;
conv->precision.set_from_arg(parse_digits());
if (c != '$') return false;
- get_char();
+ ABSL_FORMAT_PARSER_INTERNAL_GET_CHAR();
} else {
conv->precision.set_from_arg(++*next_arg);
}
@@ -188,23 +203,23 @@ bool ConsumeConversion(string_view *src, UnboundConversion *conv,
std::int8_t id = kIds[static_cast<unsigned char>(c)];
if (id < 0) {
- if (id == none) return false;
+ if (ABSL_PREDICT_FALSE(id == none)) return false;
// It is a length modifier.
using str_format_internal::LengthMod;
LengthMod length_mod = LengthMod::FromId(static_cast<LM>(~id));
- get_char();
+ ABSL_FORMAT_PARSER_INTERNAL_GET_CHAR();
if (c == 'h' && length_mod.id() == LengthMod::h) {
conv->length_mod = LengthMod::FromId(LengthMod::hh);
- get_char();
+ ABSL_FORMAT_PARSER_INTERNAL_GET_CHAR();
} else if (c == 'l' && length_mod.id() == LengthMod::l) {
conv->length_mod = LengthMod::FromId(LengthMod::ll);
- get_char();
+ ABSL_FORMAT_PARSER_INTERNAL_GET_CHAR();
} else {
conv->length_mod = length_mod;
}
id = kIds[static_cast<unsigned char>(c)];
- if (id < 0) return false;
+ if (ABSL_PREDICT_FALSE(id < 0)) return false;
}
assert(CheckFastPathSetting(*conv));
diff --git a/absl/strings/internal/str_format/parser_test.cc b/absl/strings/internal/str_format/parser_test.cc
index ac6886d..ae40203 100644
--- a/absl/strings/internal/str_format/parser_test.cc
+++ b/absl/strings/internal/str_format/parser_test.cc
@@ -84,9 +84,9 @@ class ConsumeUnboundConversionTest : public ::testing::Test {
TEST_F(ConsumeUnboundConversionTest, ConsumeSpecification) {
struct Expectation {
int line;
- const char *src;
- const char *out;
- const char *src_post;
+ string_view src;
+ string_view out;
+ string_view src_post;
};
const Expectation kExpect[] = {
{__LINE__, "", "", "" },
@@ -236,6 +236,16 @@ TEST_F(ConsumeUnboundConversionTest, WidthAndPrecision) {
EXPECT_EQ(9, o.precision.get_from_arg());
EXPECT_FALSE(Run(".*0$d")) << "no arg 0";
+
+ // Large values
+ EXPECT_TRUE(Run("999999999.999999999d"));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(o.width.is_from_arg());
+ EXPECT_EQ(999999999, o.width.value());
+ EXPECT_FALSE(o.precision.is_from_arg());
+ EXPECT_EQ(999999999, o.precision.value());
+
+ EXPECT_FALSE(Run("1000000000.999999999d"));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(Run("999999999.1000000000d"));
}
TEST_F(ConsumeUnboundConversionTest, Flags) {
diff --git a/absl/strings/string_view.h b/absl/strings/string_view.h
index 9c03108..6bcd3c4 100644
--- a/absl/strings/string_view.h
+++ b/absl/strings/string_view.h
@@ -173,8 +173,19 @@ class string_view {
// Implicit constructor of a `string_view` from nul-terminated `str`. When
// accepting possibly null strings, use `absl::NullSafeStringView(str)`
// instead (see below).
+#if ABSL_HAVE_BUILTIN(__builtin_strlen) || \
+ (defined(__GNUC__) && !defined(__clang__))
+ // GCC has __builtin_strlen according to
+ // https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.7.0/gcc/Other-Builtins.html, but
+ // ABSL_HAVE_BUILTIN doesn't detect that, so we use the extra checks above.
+ // __builtin_strlen is constexpr.
+ constexpr string_view(const char* str) // NOLINT(runtime/explicit)
+ : ptr_(str),
+ length_(CheckLengthInternal(str ? __builtin_strlen(str) : 0)) {}
+#else
constexpr string_view(const char* str) // NOLINT(runtime/explicit)
- : ptr_(str), length_(CheckLengthInternal(StrLenInternal(str))) {}
+ : ptr_(str), length_(CheckLengthInternal(str ? strlen(str) : 0)) {}
+#endif
// Implicit constructor of a `string_view` from a `const char*` and length.
constexpr string_view(const char* data, size_type len)
@@ -481,22 +492,6 @@ class string_view {
static constexpr size_type kMaxSize =
std::numeric_limits<difference_type>::max();
- // check whether __builtin_strlen is provided by the compiler.
- // GCC doesn't have __has_builtin()
- // (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66970),
- // but has __builtin_strlen according to
- // https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.7.0/gcc/Other-Builtins.html.
-#if ABSL_HAVE_BUILTIN(__builtin_strlen) || \
- (defined(__GNUC__) && !defined(__clang__))
- static constexpr size_type StrLenInternal(const char* str) {
- return str ? __builtin_strlen(str) : 0;
- }
-#else
- static constexpr size_type StrLenInternal(const char* str) {
- return str ? strlen(str) : 0;
- }
-#endif
-
static constexpr size_type CheckLengthInternal(size_type len) {
return ABSL_ASSERT(len <= kMaxSize), len;
}
diff --git a/absl/synchronization/internal/graphcycles.cc b/absl/synchronization/internal/graphcycles.cc
index ab1f3f8..d3878de 100644
--- a/absl/synchronization/internal/graphcycles.cc
+++ b/absl/synchronization/internal/graphcycles.cc
@@ -204,8 +204,7 @@ class NodeSet {
}
private:
- static const int32_t kEmpty;
- static const int32_t kDel;
+ enum : int32_t { kEmpty = -1, kDel = -2 };
Vec<int32_t> table_;
uint32_t occupied_; // Count of non-empty slots (includes deleted slots)
@@ -255,9 +254,6 @@ class NodeSet {
NodeSet& operator=(const NodeSet&) = delete;
};
-const int32_t NodeSet::kEmpty = -1;
-const int32_t NodeSet::kDel = -2;
-
// We encode a node index and a node version in GraphId. The version
// number is incremented when the GraphId is freed which automatically
// invalidates all copies of the GraphId.
diff --git a/absl/time/time.h b/absl/time/time.h
index 36e10b9..2f0fda4 100644
--- a/absl/time/time.h
+++ b/absl/time/time.h
@@ -322,6 +322,9 @@ Duration Ceil(Duration d, Duration unit);
// 0 == d / inf
// INT64_MAX == inf / d
//
+// d < inf
+// -inf < d
+//
// // Division by zero returns infinity, or INT64_MIN/MAX where appropriate.
// inf == d / 0
// INT64_MAX == d / absl::ZeroDuration()
diff --git a/absl/types/any_exception_safety_test.cc b/absl/types/any_exception_safety_test.cc
index cfb82d8..f9dd8c4 100644
--- a/absl/types/any_exception_safety_test.cc
+++ b/absl/types/any_exception_safety_test.cc
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ TEST(AnyExceptionSafety, Assignment) {
};
auto any_strong_tester = testing::MakeExceptionSafetyTester()
.WithInitialValue(original)
- .WithInvariants(AnyInvariants, any_is_strong);
+ .WithContracts(AnyInvariants, any_is_strong);
Thrower val(2);
absl::any any_val(val);
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ TEST(AnyExceptionSafety, Assignment) {
auto strong_empty_any_tester =
testing::MakeExceptionSafetyTester()
.WithInitialValue(absl::any{})
- .WithInvariants(AnyInvariants, empty_any_is_strong);
+ .WithContracts(AnyInvariants, empty_any_is_strong);
EXPECT_TRUE(strong_empty_any_tester.Test(assign_any));
EXPECT_TRUE(strong_empty_any_tester.Test(assign_val));
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ TEST(AnyExceptionSafety, Emplace) {
absl::any{absl::in_place_type_t<Thrower>(), 1, testing::nothrow_ctor};
auto one_tester = testing::MakeExceptionSafetyTester()
.WithInitialValue(initial_val)
- .WithInvariants(AnyInvariants, AnyIsEmpty);
+ .WithContracts(AnyInvariants, AnyIsEmpty);
auto emp_thrower = [](absl::any* ap) { ap->emplace<Thrower>(2); };
auto emp_throwervec = [](absl::any* ap) {
diff --git a/absl/types/internal/variant.h b/absl/types/internal/variant.h
index f220afd..eff4fef 100644
--- a/absl/types/internal/variant.h
+++ b/absl/types/internal/variant.h
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-// Copyright 2017 The Abseil Authors.
+// Copyright 2018 The Abseil Authors.
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
@@ -910,6 +910,11 @@ struct PerformVisitation {
template <std::size_t... TupIs, std::size_t... Is>
constexpr ReturnType Run(std::false_type /*has_valueless*/,
index_sequence<TupIs...>, SizeT<Is>...) const {
+ static_assert(
+ std::is_same<ReturnType,
+ absl::result_of_t<Op(VariantAccessResult<
+ Is, QualifiedVariants>...)>>::value,
+ "All visitation overloads must have the same return type.");
return absl::base_internal::Invoke(
absl::forward<Op>(op),
VariantCoreAccess::Access<Is>(
diff --git a/absl/types/optional_exception_safety_test.cc b/absl/types/optional_exception_safety_test.cc
index 31eb66d..d117ee5 100644
--- a/absl/types/optional_exception_safety_test.cc
+++ b/absl/types/optional_exception_safety_test.cc
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ bool ValueThrowsBadOptionalAccess(const OptionalT& optional) try {
}
template <typename OptionalT>
-AssertionResult CheckInvariants(OptionalT* optional_ptr) {
+AssertionResult OptionalInvariants(OptionalT* optional_ptr) {
// Check the current state post-throw for validity
auto& optional = *optional_ptr;
@@ -123,8 +123,8 @@ TEST(OptionalExceptionSafety, NothrowConstructors) {
TEST(OptionalExceptionSafety, Emplace) {
// Test the basic guarantee plus test the result of optional::has_value()
// is false in all cases
- auto disengaged_test = MakeExceptionSafetyTester().WithInvariants(
- CheckInvariants<Optional>, CheckDisengaged<Optional>);
+ auto disengaged_test = MakeExceptionSafetyTester().WithContracts(
+ OptionalInvariants<Optional>, CheckDisengaged<Optional>);
auto disengaged_test_empty = disengaged_test.WithInitialValue(Optional());
auto disengaged_test_nonempty =
disengaged_test.WithInitialValue(Optional(kInitialInteger));
@@ -147,11 +147,11 @@ TEST(OptionalExceptionSafety, EverythingThrowsSwap) {
// Test the basic guarantee plus test the result of optional::has_value()
// remains the same
auto test =
- MakeExceptionSafetyTester().WithInvariants(CheckInvariants<Optional>);
+ MakeExceptionSafetyTester().WithContracts(OptionalInvariants<Optional>);
auto disengaged_test_empty = test.WithInitialValue(Optional())
- .WithInvariants(CheckDisengaged<Optional>);
+ .WithContracts(CheckDisengaged<Optional>);
auto engaged_test_nonempty = test.WithInitialValue(Optional(kInitialInteger))
- .WithInvariants(CheckEngaged<Optional>);
+ .WithContracts(CheckEngaged<Optional>);
auto swap_empty = [](Optional* optional_ptr) {
auto empty = Optional();
@@ -192,11 +192,11 @@ TEST(OptionalExceptionSafety, CopyAssign) {
// Test the basic guarantee plus test the result of optional::has_value()
// remains the same
auto test =
- MakeExceptionSafetyTester().WithInvariants(CheckInvariants<Optional>);
+ MakeExceptionSafetyTester().WithContracts(OptionalInvariants<Optional>);
auto disengaged_test_empty = test.WithInitialValue(Optional())
- .WithInvariants(CheckDisengaged<Optional>);
+ .WithContracts(CheckDisengaged<Optional>);
auto engaged_test_nonempty = test.WithInitialValue(Optional(kInitialInteger))
- .WithInvariants(CheckEngaged<Optional>);
+ .WithContracts(CheckEngaged<Optional>);
auto copyassign_nonempty = [](Optional* optional_ptr) {
auto nonempty =
@@ -218,11 +218,11 @@ TEST(OptionalExceptionSafety, MoveAssign) {
// Test the basic guarantee plus test the result of optional::has_value()
// remains the same
auto test =
- MakeExceptionSafetyTester().WithInvariants(CheckInvariants<Optional>);
+ MakeExceptionSafetyTester().WithContracts(OptionalInvariants<Optional>);
auto disengaged_test_empty = test.WithInitialValue(Optional())
- .WithInvariants(CheckDisengaged<Optional>);
+ .WithContracts(CheckDisengaged<Optional>);
auto engaged_test_nonempty = test.WithInitialValue(Optional(kInitialInteger))
- .WithInvariants(CheckEngaged<Optional>);
+ .WithContracts(CheckEngaged<Optional>);
auto moveassign_empty = [](Optional* optional_ptr) {
auto empty = Optional();
diff --git a/absl/types/variant_exception_safety_test.cc b/absl/types/variant_exception_safety_test.cc
index a3c9eac..58436f0 100644
--- a/absl/types/variant_exception_safety_test.cc
+++ b/absl/types/variant_exception_safety_test.cc
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ void ToValuelessByException(ThrowingVariant& v) { // NOLINT
}
// Check that variant is still in a usable state after an exception is thrown.
-testing::AssertionResult CheckInvariants(ThrowingVariant* v) {
+testing::AssertionResult VariantInvariants(ThrowingVariant* v) {
using testing::AssertionFailure;
using testing::AssertionSuccess;
@@ -213,8 +213,8 @@ TEST(VariantExceptionSafetyTest, CopyAssign) {
MakeExceptionSafetyTester()
.WithInitialValue(WithThrower())
.WithOperation([&rhs](ThrowingVariant* lhs) { *lhs = rhs; });
- EXPECT_TRUE(tester.WithInvariants(CheckInvariants).Test());
- EXPECT_FALSE(tester.WithInvariants(strong_guarantee).Test());
+ EXPECT_TRUE(tester.WithContracts(VariantInvariants).Test());
+ EXPECT_FALSE(tester.WithContracts(strong_guarantee).Test());
}
{
const ThrowingVariant rhs(ExpectedThrowerVec());
@@ -222,8 +222,8 @@ TEST(VariantExceptionSafetyTest, CopyAssign) {
MakeExceptionSafetyTester()
.WithInitialValue(WithThrowerVec())
.WithOperation([&rhs](ThrowingVariant* lhs) { *lhs = rhs; });
- EXPECT_TRUE(tester.WithInvariants(CheckInvariants).Test());
- EXPECT_FALSE(tester.WithInvariants(strong_guarantee).Test());
+ EXPECT_TRUE(tester.WithContracts(VariantInvariants).Test());
+ EXPECT_FALSE(tester.WithContracts(strong_guarantee).Test());
}
// libstdc++ std::variant has bugs on copy assignment regarding exception
// safety.
@@ -251,12 +251,12 @@ TEST(VariantExceptionSafetyTest, CopyAssign) {
.WithInitialValue(WithCopyNoThrow())
.WithOperation([&rhs](ThrowingVariant* lhs) { *lhs = rhs; });
EXPECT_TRUE(tester
- .WithInvariants(CheckInvariants,
- [](ThrowingVariant* lhs) {
- return lhs->valueless_by_exception();
- })
+ .WithContracts(VariantInvariants,
+ [](ThrowingVariant* lhs) {
+ return lhs->valueless_by_exception();
+ })
.Test());
- EXPECT_FALSE(tester.WithInvariants(strong_guarantee).Test());
+ EXPECT_FALSE(tester.WithContracts(strong_guarantee).Test());
}
#endif // !(defined(ABSL_HAVE_STD_VARIANT) && defined(__GLIBCXX__))
{
@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ TEST(VariantExceptionSafetyTest, CopyAssign) {
const ThrowingVariant rhs(MoveNothrow{});
EXPECT_TRUE(MakeExceptionSafetyTester()
.WithInitialValue(WithThrower())
- .WithInvariants(CheckInvariants, strong_guarantee)
+ .WithContracts(VariantInvariants, strong_guarantee)
.Test([&rhs](ThrowingVariant* lhs) { *lhs = rhs; }));
}
}
@@ -304,11 +304,11 @@ TEST(VariantExceptionSafetyTest, MoveAssign) {
*lhs = std::move(copy);
});
EXPECT_TRUE(tester
- .WithInvariants(
- CheckInvariants,
+ .WithContracts(
+ VariantInvariants,
[&](ThrowingVariant* lhs) { return lhs->index() == j; })
.Test());
- EXPECT_FALSE(tester.WithInvariants(strong_guarantee).Test());
+ EXPECT_FALSE(tester.WithContracts(strong_guarantee).Test());
}
{
// - otherwise (index() != j), equivalent to
@@ -318,10 +318,10 @@ TEST(VariantExceptionSafetyTest, MoveAssign) {
ThrowingVariant rhs(CopyNothrow{});
EXPECT_TRUE(MakeExceptionSafetyTester()
.WithInitialValue(WithThrower())
- .WithInvariants(CheckInvariants,
- [](ThrowingVariant* lhs) {
- return lhs->valueless_by_exception();
- })
+ .WithContracts(VariantInvariants,
+ [](ThrowingVariant* lhs) {
+ return lhs->valueless_by_exception();
+ })
.Test([&](ThrowingVariant* lhs) {
auto copy = rhs;
*lhs = std::move(copy);
@@ -347,12 +347,12 @@ TEST(VariantExceptionSafetyTest, ValueAssign) {
.WithInitialValue(WithThrower())
.WithOperation([rhs](ThrowingVariant* lhs) { *lhs = rhs; });
EXPECT_TRUE(copy_tester
- .WithInvariants(CheckInvariants,
- [](ThrowingVariant* lhs) {
- return !lhs->valueless_by_exception();
- })
+ .WithContracts(VariantInvariants,
+ [](ThrowingVariant* lhs) {
+ return !lhs->valueless_by_exception();
+ })
.Test());
- EXPECT_FALSE(copy_tester.WithInvariants(strong_guarantee).Test());
+ EXPECT_FALSE(copy_tester.WithContracts(strong_guarantee).Test());
// move assign
auto move_tester = MakeExceptionSafetyTester()
.WithInitialValue(WithThrower())
@@ -361,13 +361,13 @@ TEST(VariantExceptionSafetyTest, ValueAssign) {
*lhs = std::move(copy);
});
EXPECT_TRUE(move_tester
- .WithInvariants(CheckInvariants,
- [](ThrowingVariant* lhs) {
- return !lhs->valueless_by_exception();
- })
+ .WithContracts(VariantInvariants,
+ [](ThrowingVariant* lhs) {
+ return !lhs->valueless_by_exception();
+ })
.Test());
- EXPECT_FALSE(move_tester.WithInvariants(strong_guarantee).Test());
+ EXPECT_FALSE(move_tester.WithContracts(strong_guarantee).Test());
}
// Otherwise (*this holds something else), if is_nothrow_constructible_v<Tj,
// T> || !is_nothrow_move_constructible_v<Tj> is true, equivalent to
@@ -400,12 +400,12 @@ TEST(VariantExceptionSafetyTest, ValueAssign) {
.WithInitialValue(WithCopyNoThrow())
.WithOperation([&rhs](ThrowingVariant* lhs) { *lhs = rhs; });
EXPECT_TRUE(copy_tester
- .WithInvariants(CheckInvariants,
- [](ThrowingVariant* lhs) {
- return lhs->valueless_by_exception();
- })
+ .WithContracts(VariantInvariants,
+ [](ThrowingVariant* lhs) {
+ return lhs->valueless_by_exception();
+ })
.Test());
- EXPECT_FALSE(copy_tester.WithInvariants(strong_guarantee).Test());
+ EXPECT_FALSE(copy_tester.WithContracts(strong_guarantee).Test());
// move
auto move_tester = MakeExceptionSafetyTester()
.WithInitialValue(WithCopyNoThrow())
@@ -413,12 +413,12 @@ TEST(VariantExceptionSafetyTest, ValueAssign) {
*lhs = ExpectedThrower(testing::nothrow_ctor);
});
EXPECT_TRUE(move_tester
- .WithInvariants(CheckInvariants,
- [](ThrowingVariant* lhs) {
- return lhs->valueless_by_exception();
- })
+ .WithContracts(VariantInvariants,
+ [](ThrowingVariant* lhs) {
+ return lhs->valueless_by_exception();
+ })
.Test());
- EXPECT_FALSE(move_tester.WithInvariants(strong_guarantee).Test());
+ EXPECT_FALSE(move_tester.WithContracts(strong_guarantee).Test());
}
// Otherwise (if is_nothrow_constructible_v<Tj, T> == false &&
// is_nothrow_move_constructible<Tj> == true),
@@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ TEST(VariantExceptionSafetyTest, ValueAssign) {
MoveNothrow rhs;
EXPECT_TRUE(MakeExceptionSafetyTester()
.WithInitialValue(WithThrower())
- .WithInvariants(CheckInvariants, strong_guarantee)
+ .WithContracts(VariantInvariants, strong_guarantee)
.Test([&rhs](ThrowingVariant* lhs) { *lhs = rhs; }));
}
#endif // !(defined(ABSL_HAVE_STD_VARIANT) && defined(__GLIBCXX__))
@@ -450,12 +450,12 @@ TEST(VariantExceptionSafetyTest, Emplace) {
v->emplace<Thrower>(args);
});
EXPECT_TRUE(tester
- .WithInvariants(CheckInvariants,
- [](ThrowingVariant* v) {
- return v->valueless_by_exception();
- })
+ .WithContracts(VariantInvariants,
+ [](ThrowingVariant* v) {
+ return v->valueless_by_exception();
+ })
.Test());
- EXPECT_FALSE(tester.WithInvariants(strong_guarantee).Test());
+ EXPECT_FALSE(tester.WithContracts(strong_guarantee).Test());
}
}
@@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ TEST(VariantExceptionSafetyTest, Swap) {
ThrowingVariant rhs = ExpectedThrower();
EXPECT_TRUE(MakeExceptionSafetyTester()
.WithInitialValue(WithThrower())
- .WithInvariants(CheckInvariants)
+ .WithContracts(VariantInvariants)
.Test([&](ThrowingVariant* lhs) {
auto copy = rhs;
lhs->swap(copy);
@@ -486,7 +486,7 @@ TEST(VariantExceptionSafetyTest, Swap) {
ThrowingVariant rhs = ExpectedThrower();
EXPECT_TRUE(MakeExceptionSafetyTester()
.WithInitialValue(WithCopyNoThrow())
- .WithInvariants(CheckInvariants)
+ .WithContracts(VariantInvariants)
.Test([&](ThrowingVariant* lhs) {
auto copy = rhs;
lhs->swap(copy);
@@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ TEST(VariantExceptionSafetyTest, Swap) {
ThrowingVariant rhs = ExpectedThrower();
EXPECT_TRUE(MakeExceptionSafetyTester()
.WithInitialValue(WithCopyNoThrow())
- .WithInvariants(CheckInvariants)
+ .WithContracts(VariantInvariants)
.Test([&](ThrowingVariant* lhs) {
auto copy = rhs;
copy.swap(*lhs);
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.1) at 2024-12-01 20:36:52 +0000